{"id":795092,"date":"2026-04-08T16:30:48","date_gmt":"2026-04-08T14:30:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/?p=795092"},"modified":"2026-04-08T16:31:04","modified_gmt":"2026-04-08T14:31:04","slug":"795092","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/2026\/04\/08\/795092\/","title":{"rendered":"Meta mbetet n\u00eb burg, Kushtetuesja: Masa proporcionale dhe e ligjshme","gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"text"}]},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

Kreu i Partis\u00eb s\u00eb Liris\u00eb, Ilir Meta e humbi betej\u00ebn p\u00ebr liri edhe n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Kushtetuese.<\/span><\/p>\n

Me shumic\u00eb votash, Kushtetuesja vendosi rr\u00ebzimin e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs s\u00eb Met\u00ebs p\u00ebr shfuqizimin e mas\u00ebs arrest me burg me argumentin se masa e siguris\u00eb e vendosur ndaj tij \u00ebsht\u00eb e ligjshme dhe proporcionale.<\/span><\/p>\n

Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, Kushtetuesja nuk e ka marr\u00eb n\u00eb shqyrtim m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn e arrestimit t\u00eb Met\u00ebs n\u00eb tetor 2024, pasi p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje ish-presidenti ka b\u00ebr\u00eb kall\u00ebzim dhe po hetohet nga Prokuroria e Tiran\u00ebs.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Vendimi i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span><\/p>\n

Gjykata Kushtetuese e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb (Gjykata) n\u00eb dat\u00ebn 08.04.2026 mori n\u00eb shqyrtim n\u00eb seanc\u00eb plenare mbi baz\u00eb t\u00eb dokumenteve \u00e7\u00ebshtjen me k\u00ebrkues Ilir Metaj, me objekt: Shfuqizimi i vendimeve nr. 125, date 20.10.2024 dne mr. 130 dat\u00eb 23.10.2024, t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Posa\u00e7me t\u00eb Shkalles s\u00eb Par\u00eb p\u00ebr Korrupsionin dhe Krimin e Organizuar, nr. 59 (87-2024-333), date 19 11.2024 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Posa\u00e7me t\u00eb Apelit p\u00ebr Korrupsionin dhe Krimin e Organizuar dhe nr. 00-2025-364 (57) date 27.02. 2025 t\u00eb Kolegjit Penal t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb si te papajtueshme me Kushtetut\u00ebn e Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb.”.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Gjykata pasi mori n\u00eb shqyrtim pretendimet dhe prap\u00ebsimet e pal\u00ebve, n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbledhur, v\u00ebren p\u00ebr sa vijon:<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

S\u00eb pari, k\u00ebrkuesi legjitimohet ratione personae dhe ratione temporis p\u00ebr v\u00ebnien n\u00eb l\u00ebvizje t\u00eb kontrollit kushtetues p\u00ebr vendimet gjyq\u00ebsore q\u00eb kan\u00eb disponsar ndaj tij mas\u00ebn e sigurimit personal “Arrest n\u00eb burg”.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

S\u00eb dyti, sa i takon kriterit p\u00ebr shterimin e mjeteve juridike, k\u00ebrkuesi ka pretenduar cenimin e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u00eb mos iu n\u00ebnshtruar torture\u00eb, d\u00ebnint apo trajtimit mizor, \u00e7njer\u00ebzor ose posht\u00ebrues, t\u00eb garantuar nga neni 25 i Kushteturn\u00e9s de neni 3 i KEDNJ-s\u00eb, lidhur me ngjarjen e dat\u00ebs 21.10.2024 p\u00ebr m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn e ekzekutimit nga Policia e Shtetit t\u00eb mas\u00ebs s\u00eb sigurimit “Arrest n\u00eb burg”, n\u00eb zbatim t\u00eb vendimit nr. 125, dat\u00eb 20.10.2024 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Posa\u00e7me t\u00eb Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb p\u00ebr Korrupsionin dhe Krimin e Organizuar. Gjykata konstatoi, nga nj\u00ebra an\u00eb, se k\u00ebrkuesi e ka parashtruar k\u00ebt\u00eb pretendim n\u00eb gjykatat e juridiksionit t\u00eb zakonsh\u00ebm n\u00eb procesin gjyq\u00ebsor p\u00ebr verifikimin e kushteve dhe kritereve t\u00eb caktimit t\u00eb mas\u00ebs s\u00eb sigurimit personal dhe nevojave t\u00eb sigurimit, ankimin dhe rekursin e tij dhe, nga ana tjet\u00ebr, se autoritetet shtet\u00ebrore kompetente nuk kan\u00eb vepruar n\u00eb at\u00eb koh\u00eb me nism\u00ebn e tyre p\u00ebr t\u00eb adresuar pretendimet e k\u00ebrkuesit. Megjithat\u00eb, sipas informacionit t\u00eb p\u00ebrcjell\u00eb nga Prokuroria pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm Tiran\u00eb k\u00ebrkuesi ka paraqitur kall\u00ebzim lidhur me ngjarjen dhe pran\u00eb asaj prokurorie n\u00eb vitin 2025, duke u regjistruar procedimi penal p\u00ebr vepr\u00ebn penale “Kryerja e veprimeve arbitrare”, t\u00eb parashikuar nga neni 250 i Kodit Penal, p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilin hetimet jan\u00eb n\u00eb vijim. N\u00eb kushtet kur nuk ka ende nj\u00eb vendim p\u00ebrfundimtar nga gjykatat e zakonshme mbi k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje, Gjykata, me shumic\u00eb votash, vler\u00ebsoi se nuk mund ta marr\u00eb n\u00eb shqyrtim duke qen\u00eb se kontrolli i saj ka natyr\u00eb subsidiare, n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 131. shkronja “f”, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

S\u00eb treti, n\u00eb aspektin e kriterit ratione materiae, Gjykata u ndal n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e argumenteve t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuesit n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb cenimit t\u00eb liris\u00eb personale n\u00eb aspektin substancial t\u00eb lidhur me (1) standardin e dyshimit t\u00eb arsyesh\u00ebm t\u00eb bazuar n\u00eb prova dhe (ii) parimit t\u00eb proporcionalitetit, t\u00eb garantuara nga nenet 17. 27 dhe 28 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs. Gjykata, me shumic\u00eb votash, vler\u00ebsoi se: n\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen penale ndaj k\u00ebrkuesit duket se ka fakte dhe informacione q\u00eb arrijn\u00eb t\u00eb bindnin nj\u00eb v\u00ebzhgues t\u00eb jasht\u00ebm se k\u00ebrkuesi mund t\u00eb ket\u00eb kryer veprat penale p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilat dyshohet, ndaj nuk mund t\u00eb arrihet n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se kufizimi i liris\u00eb s\u00eb tij \u00ebsht\u00eb kryer n\u00eb munges\u00eb t\u00eb dyshimit t\u00eb arsyesh\u00ebm, n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 27, paragrafi 2, shkronja “c”, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs dhe nenit 5, pika 1, shkronja “e”, t\u00eb KEDNJ-s\u00eb, masa e sigurimit personal ndaj k\u00ebrkuesit \u00ebsht\u00eb e vendosur p\u00ebr nj\u00eb q\u00ebllim t\u00eb ligjsh\u00ebm, garantimin e mbar\u00ebvajtjes s\u00eb procesit penal n\u00eb ngarkim t\u00eb tij, ajo nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb joproporcionale n\u00eb kontekstin e rrethanave t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes dhe nevojave t\u00eb sigurimit, si dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me rregullat procedurale t\u00eb KPP-s\u00eb p\u00ebr caktimin e saj.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim t\u00eb shqyrtimit t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj \u00e7\u00ebshtjeje, Gjykata vendosi, me shumic\u00eb votash: Rr\u00ebzimin e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Ilir Meta ndodhet i izoluar q\u00eb prej tetorit t\u00eb vitit 2024, pas akuzave p\u00ebr korrupsion, shp\u00ebrdorim detyre dhe fshehje pasurie t\u00eb ngritura ndaj tij nga SPAK.<\/span><\/p>\n

Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb m\u00eb dat\u00eb 27 prill n\u00eb or\u00ebn 11:00 do t\u00eb mbahet seanca e par\u00eb n\u00eb themel n\u00eb GJKKO p\u00ebr Met\u00ebn dhe 4 t\u00eb pandehurit e tjer\u00eb.<\/span><\/p>\n

Ilir Meta dhe Monika Kryemadhi kan\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar gjykim t\u00eb zakonsh\u00ebm, nd\u00ebrsa Fatime Kryemadhi, Pirro Xhixho dhe Ema \u00c7oku form\u00ebn e procedur\u00ebs s\u00eb shkurtuar. Mbi k\u00ebt\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb do t\u00eb shprehet trupa gjykuese n\u00eb themel, n\u00eb rast se do pranohet ndarja e Kryemadhit dhe e Met\u00ebs nga tre t\u00eb pandehurit e tjer\u00eb, apo n\u00ebse ata do t\u00eb gjykohen si grup.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kreu i Partis\u00eb s\u00eb Liris\u00eb, Ilir Meta e humbi betej\u00ebn p\u00ebr liri edhe n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Kushtetuese. Me shumic\u00eb votash, Kushtetuesja vendosi rr\u00ebzimin e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs s\u00eb Met\u00ebs p\u00ebr shfuqizimin e mas\u00ebs arrest me burg me argumentin se masa e siguris\u00eb e vendosur ndaj tij \u00ebsht\u00eb e ligjshme dhe proporcionale. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, Kushtetuesja nuk e ka marr\u00eb n\u00eb […]<\/p>\n","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"author":32,"featured_media":783544,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-795092","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-lajme"],"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"link","format":"url"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/795092","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=795092"}],"version-history":[{"count":795094,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/795092\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":795094,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/795092\/revisions\/795094"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/783544"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=795092"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=795092"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=795092"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}