![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/neta.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Kryeministri izraelit Netanyahu mbrojti publikisht k\u00ebshilltarin e tij t\u00eb ngusht\u00eb Jonathan Urich t\u00eb h\u00ebn\u00ebn, pasi Urich u akuzua p\u00ebr rrjedhjen e nj\u00eb dokumenti t\u00eb klasifikuar p\u00ebr gazet\u00ebn gjermane Bild.<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cAi nuk d\u00ebmtoi sigurin\u00eb shtet\u00ebrore\u201d<\/i><\/em>, pohoi Netanyahu. Por nj\u00eb lexim i kujdessh\u00ebm i akuzave dhe vler\u00ebsimeve shoq\u00ebruese t\u00eb siguris\u00eb zbulon nj\u00eb pamje shum\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb nd\u00ebrlikuar. Zyrtar\u00ebt ligjor\u00eb v\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb dukje se, nd\u00ebrsa kryeministri ka autoritetin p\u00ebr t\u00eb miratuar publikimin e informacionit t\u00eb klasifikuar – nj\u00eb pik\u00eb mosmarr\u00ebveshjeje brenda zbatimit t\u00eb ligjit, ky autoritet nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb i pakufizuar. <\/span><\/p>\n Ai nuk p\u00ebrfshin t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb rrezikuar sigurin\u00eb komb\u00ebtare. As kryeministri nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb ai q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb i autorizuar p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuar n\u00ebse nj\u00eb publikim i till\u00eb ka shkaktuar d\u00ebm. Ky autoritet u takon organeve t\u00eb siguris\u00eb s\u00eb Izraelit – Inteligjenc\u00ebs Ushtarake, Shin Bet, Mossad dhe divizionit t\u00eb siguris\u00eb s\u00eb Ministris\u00eb s\u00eb Mbrojtjes – vler\u00ebsimet e t\u00eb cilave zakonisht pranohen nga gjykatat si prova objektive.<\/span><\/p>\n N\u00eb zem\u00ebr t\u00eb t\u00eb ashtuquajtur\u00ebs \u00e7\u00ebshtje dokumenti t\u00eb Hamasit – q\u00eb thuhet se i \u00ebsht\u00eb zbuluar Bild – \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb akuz\u00eb serioze se shfaqja e\u00a0tij mund t\u00eb ket\u00eb zbuluar nj\u00eb metod\u00eb t\u00eb mbledhjes s\u00eb informacionit t\u00eb klasifikuar t\u00eb Inteligjenc\u00ebs Ushtarake t\u00eb p\u00ebrdorur n\u00eb Gaza. Dokumenti \u00ebsht\u00eb marr\u00eb “n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb ndaluar p\u00ebr publikim” dhe, sipas aktakuz\u00ebs kund\u00ebr t\u00eb pandehurve t\u00eb tjer\u00eb Eli Feldstein dhe Ari Rosenfeld, informacioni \u00ebsht\u00eb mbledhur “duke p\u00ebrdorur nj\u00eb mjet shum\u00eb t\u00eb klasifikuar”. Publikimi i tij, argumentojn\u00eb ata, mund t\u00eb kishte parandaluar p\u00ebrdorimin e m\u00ebtejsh\u00ebm t\u00eb atij mjeti n\u00eb arena t\u00eb tjera operative.<\/span><\/p>\n Aktakuza kund\u00ebr Urich nuk pretendon se ka ndodhur d\u00ebm i v\u00ebrtet\u00eb, por pohon se ai kishte p\u00ebr q\u00ebllim t\u00eb d\u00ebmtonte sigurin\u00eb shtet\u00ebrore dhe se veprimet e tij kishin potencialin ta b\u00ebnin k\u00ebt\u00eb.<\/span><\/p>\n Nj\u00eb vler\u00ebsim sigurie i paraqitur n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast paralajm\u00ebroi se zbulimi i metod\u00ebs s\u00eb mbledhjes s\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave mund t\u00eb ndihmonte Hamasin t\u00eb deshifronte taktikat e inteligjenc\u00ebs s\u00eb IDF-s\u00eb n\u00eb Gaza – dhe t\u00eb rrezikonte jet\u00ebt\u00a0e personelit t\u00eb siguris\u00eb. Ky vler\u00ebsim ishte nj\u00eb nga faktor\u00ebt q\u00eb e shtyu gjyqtarin Yosef Elron t\u00eb urdh\u00ebronte vijimin e paraburgimit t\u00eb t\u00eb dyshuarve n\u00eb tetor. Kjo holl\u00ebsi u raportua p\u00ebr her\u00eb t\u00eb par\u00eb nga Ynet, i cili zbuloi gjithashtu se vler\u00ebsimi ishte p\u00ebrgatitur nga nj\u00eb oficer i lart\u00eb i inteligjenc\u00ebs s\u00eb IDF-s\u00eb.<\/span><\/p>\n N\u00eb terma ligjor\u00eb, “d\u00ebmi ndaj siguris\u00eb shtet\u00ebrore” matet me nj\u00eb standard objektiv. Kjo do t\u00eb thot\u00eb, gjykatat mb\u00ebshteten n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimet nga agjencit\u00eb e siguris\u00eb, t\u00eb cilat trajtohen si prova t\u00eb konsiderueshme, por mbrojtja ka t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t’i kund\u00ebrshtoj\u00eb ato dhe t\u00eb p\u00ebrpiqet t\u00eb minoj\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimet e tyre. Ky parim zbatohet edhe jasht\u00eb procedurave penale. <\/span><\/p>\n P\u00ebr shembull, n\u00eb vitin 2011, aktivist\u00ebt e Malit t\u00eb Tempullit i k\u00ebrkuan Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb t\u00eb publikonte raportin e kontrolluesit t\u00eb shtetit mbi mbik\u00ebqyrjen e nd\u00ebrtimit n\u00eb vend. Shin Bet paraqiti nj\u00eb opinion duke paralajm\u00ebruar se publikimi i raportit do p\u00ebrb\u00ebnte nj\u00eb k\u00ebrc\u00ebnim real p\u00ebr sigurin\u00eb. N\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb ngjashme, legjislacioni q\u00eb ndalon transmetimet e Al Jazeera n\u00eb Izrael mb\u00ebshtetet n\u00eb vler\u00ebsime t\u00eb krahasueshme t\u00eb siguris\u00eb q\u00eb paralajm\u00ebrojn\u00eb p\u00ebr potencialin e rrjetit p\u00ebr t\u00eb shkaktuar d\u00ebm.<\/span><\/p>\n N\u00ebse avokat\u00ebt e Urich k\u00ebrkojn\u00eb t\u00eb paraqesin mendimin e Netanyahut n\u00eb gjykat\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb sfiduar q\u00ebndrimin e establishmentit t\u00eb siguris\u00eb, kryeministri do detyrohet t\u00eb d\u00ebshmoj\u00eb personalisht dhe t’i n\u00ebnshtrohet pyetjeve t\u00eb kryq\u00ebzuara. Ai ka t\u00eb ngjar\u00eb t\u00eb pyetet n\u00eb lidhje me njohurit\u00eb e tij p\u00ebr mjetin e klasifikuar, m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn se si funksionon, origjin\u00ebn e dokumentit t\u00eb rrjedhur dhe m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn se si \u00ebsht\u00eb marr\u00eb informacioni. \u00cbsht\u00eb e dyshimt\u00eb q\u00eb Netanyahu mund t\u00eb pretendoj\u00eb njohuri t\u00eb holl\u00ebsishme ose t\u00eb ket\u00eb ndonj\u00eb autoritet dometh\u00ebn\u00ebs n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb fush\u00eb – sigurisht jo t\u00eb mjaftueshme p\u00ebr t\u00eb anashkaluar ekspert\u00ebt e siguris\u00eb, t\u00eb cil\u00ebve u p\u00ebrket kjo fush\u00eb.<\/span><\/p>\n Prokurori i P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm Gali Baharav-Miara deklaroi gjithashtu se “zbulimi i dokumentit nga Urich p\u00ebrb\u00ebnte nj\u00eb rrezik p\u00ebr sigurin\u00eb komb\u00ebtare dhe jet\u00ebn njer\u00ebzore” – edhe pse nuk pretendohet asnj\u00eb d\u00ebm i v\u00ebrtet\u00eb. Fleta e akuz\u00ebs v\u00ebren se p\u00ebrmbajtja e rrjedhur p\u00ebrfshinte “informacion t\u00eb klasifikuar jet\u00ebsor p\u00ebr sigurin\u00eb shtet\u00ebrore, t\u00eb zbuluar nga individ\u00eb t\u00eb paautorizuar – disa prej t\u00eb cil\u00ebve kishin p\u00ebr q\u00ebllim t\u00eb d\u00ebmtonin sigurin\u00eb shtet\u00ebrore”.<\/span><\/p>\n Me fjal\u00eb t\u00eb tjera, akuza kund\u00ebr Urich p\u00ebrqendrohet n\u00eb q\u00ebllimin dhe pakujdesin\u00eb, jo n\u00eb d\u00ebmin real. Pretendimi i Netanyahut se nuk ka ndodhur asnj\u00eb d\u00ebm nuk trajton formulimin ligjor t\u00eb akuzave, t\u00eb cilat kurr\u00eb nuk pohojn\u00eb se ka ndodhur.<\/span><\/p>\n Ekipi ligjor i Urich pritet t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtoj\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e siguris\u00eb, por precedent\u00ebt ligjor\u00eb tregojn\u00eb se kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb kod\u00ebr e v\u00ebshtir\u00eb p\u00ebr t’u ngjitur. N\u00eb nj\u00eb rast spiunazhi t\u00eb koh\u00ebve t\u00eb fundit para Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, p\u00ebr shembull, nj\u00eb debat i ngjash\u00ebm ligjor u p\u00ebrqendrua rreth nj\u00eb mendimi t\u00eb Shin Bet, dhe gjykata n\u00eb fund t\u00eb fundit mbajti an\u00ebn e sh\u00ebrbimeve t\u00eb siguris\u00eb. Mb\u00ebshtetja publike e Netanyahut mund t’i ofroj\u00eb Urich mb\u00ebshtetje politike, por ligj\u00ebrisht, \u00ebsht\u00eb larg t\u00eb qenit e mjaftueshme p\u00ebr t\u00eb anashkaluar sistemin e siguris\u00eb ose p\u00ebr t\u00eb parandaluar nj\u00eb padi t\u00eb mundshme.<\/span><\/p>\n