{"id":680043,"date":"2024-06-07T13:58:02","date_gmt":"2024-06-07T11:58:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/?p=680043"},"modified":"2024-06-07T13:58:02","modified_gmt":"2024-06-07T11:58:02","slug":"dritan-dajti-kerkoi-perjashtimin-e-gjyqtarit-sander-simoni-gjykata-e-larte-rrezon-kerkesen","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/2024\/06\/07\/dritan-dajti-kerkoi-perjashtimin-e-gjyqtarit-sander-simoni-gjykata-e-larte-rrezon-kerkesen\/","title":{"rendered":"Dritan Dajti k\u00ebrkoi p\u00ebrjashtimin e gjyqtarit Sand\u00ebr Simoni, Gjykata e Lart\u00eb rr\u00ebzon k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn","gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"text"}]},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>Gjykata e Lart\u00eb ka rr\u00ebzuar k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e Dritan Dajtit, p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjashtimin e gjyqtarit Sand\u00ebr Simoni nga \u00e7\u00ebshtja e tij. K\u00ebrkesa u rr\u00ebzua nga gjyqtari Enton Dhimitri.<\/span><\/p>\n

Dajti kishte k\u00ebrkuar n\u00eb GJL p\u00ebrjashtimin nga trupa gjykuese t\u00eb Simonit, me arsyetimin se ai \u00ebsht\u00eb i nj\u00ebansh\u00ebm. Kujtojm\u00eb se Dritan Dajti ndodhet n\u00eb burg, i akuzuar p\u00ebr vrasjen e kat\u00ebr efektiv\u00ebve.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Njoftimi i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb:<\/span><\/p>\n

REPUBLIKA E SHQIP\u00cbRIS\u00cb<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

GJYKATA E LART\u00cb<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Nr. 71000-00356-00-2024 i Regj. Themeltar<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Nr. 00-2024-1043 i Vendimit<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

VENDIM<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

P\u00cbR P\u00cbRJASHTIM GJYQTARI<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Kolegji Civil i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, me trup gjykues t\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00eb nga:<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Gjyqtar: Enton DHIMITRI<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

sot, m\u00eb dat\u00eb 06.06.2024, mori n\u00eb shqyrtim, n\u00eb dhom\u00eb k\u00ebshillimi, k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn penale me nr. 71000-00356-00-2024\u00a0 akti, regjistruar n\u00eb sekretarin\u00eb e k\u00ebsaj gjykate n\u00eb dat\u00eb 04.06.2024, q\u00eb i p\u00ebrket:<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

K\u00cbRKUES:\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Dritan Dajti<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

OBJEKTI:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 P\u00ebrjashtimin e gjyqtarit Sand\u00ebr Simoni, nga gjykimi i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes penale me nr. 52105-00378-00-2019, n\u00eb ngarkim t\u00eb t\u00eb pandehurit Dritan Dajti, pasi ekzistojn\u00eb shkaqe t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme t\u00eb nj\u00ebnashm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb tij.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

P\u00ebrjashtimin e gjyqtarit Sander Simoni, nga gjykimi i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes penale me nr. 52105-00378-00-2019, n\u00eb ngarkim t\u00eb t\u00eb pandehurit Dritan Dajti, pasi gjat\u00eb ushtrimit t\u00eb funksioneve ka shfaqur mendimin e tij mbi faktet dhe rrethanat objekt t\u00eb k\u00ebtij procedimi.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

BAZA LIGJORE:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Neni 17 e vijues t\u00eb Kodit t\u00eb Procedur\u00ebs Penale.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

N\u00eb lidhje me \u00e7\u00ebshtjen penale me nr. 52105-00378-00-2019, dat\u00eb regjistrimi 05.04.2019, qe i p\u00ebrket:<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

K\u00cbRKUES:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Prokuroria pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb p\u00ebr Krimet e R\u00ebnda<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

I PADEHUR:\u00a0 Dritan Dajti<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

AKUZUAR:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u201cVrasja n\u00eb rrethana t\u00eb tjera cil\u00ebsuese\u201d ndaj punonj\u00ebsit t\u00eb policis\u00eb Fatos Xhani, parashikuar nga neni 79\/c i Kodit Penal, \u201cVrasja n\u00eb rrethana t\u00eb tjera cil\u00ebsuese\u201d ndaj punonj\u00ebsit t\u00eb policis\u00eb Sajmir Du\u00e7kollari, parashikuar nga neni 79\/c i Kodit Penal, \u201cVrasja n\u00eb rrethana t\u00eb tjera cil\u00ebsuese\u201d ndaj punonj\u00ebsit t\u00eb policis\u00eb Altin Dizdari, parashikuar nga neni 79\/c i Kodit Penal, \u201cVrasja n\u00eb rrethana t\u00eb tjera cil\u00ebsuese\u201d ndaj punonj\u00ebsit t\u00eb policis\u00eb Kastriot Feskaj, parashikuar nga neni 79\/c i Kodit Penal, \u201cVrasja n\u00eb rrethana t\u00eb tjera cil\u00ebsuese\u201d, n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb rrezikshme p\u00ebr jet\u00ebn e shum\u00eb personave me pasoj\u00eb vdekjen e shtetasit Ledjon Mara dhe plagosjen e shtetasit Fatjon Shamku, parashikuar nga neni 79\/\u00eb i Kodit Penal, \u201cMbajtje pa leje t\u00eb arm\u00ebv\u00eb luftarake\u201d, parashikuar nga neni 278\/2 i Kodit Penal, \u201cFalsifikimi i dokumenteve\u201d, kryer n\u00eb bashk\u00ebpunim, parashikuar nga neni 186\/2 i Kodit Penal, \u201cFalsifikimi i vulave, i stampave ose i formular\u00ebve\u201d, parashikuar nga neni 190\/1 i Kodit Penal, \u201cMbajtja e pa t\u00eb drejt\u00eb e uniform\u00ebs\u201d, parashikuar nga neni 247\/2 i Kodit Penal.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Kolegji Civil i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb pasi shqyrtoi aktet n\u00eb dhom\u00eb k\u00ebshillimi,<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

V \u00cb R E N:<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Pran\u00eb Pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, m\u00eb dat\u00eb 05.04.2019, \u00ebsht\u00eb regjistruar \u00e7\u00ebshtja penale me nr. 52105-00378-00-2019, q\u00eb i p\u00ebrket t\u00eb gjykuarit Dritan Dajti, i akuzuar p\u00ebr kryerjen e veprave penale t\u00eb sip\u00ebrp\u00ebrmendura, \u00e7\u00ebshtje e cila \u00ebsht\u00eb shpallur p\u00ebr t\u2019u shqyrtuar n\u00eb dat\u00ebn 04.06.2024, shtyr\u00eb p\u00ebr n\u00eb dat\u00ebn 11.06.2024, n\u00eb dhom\u00eb k\u00ebshillimi, mbi baz\u00ebn rekursit t\u00eb paraqitur nga Prokuroria pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit p\u00ebr Krime t\u00eb R\u00ebnda ndaj vendimit nr. 13, dat\u00eb 08.02.2019, t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit p\u00ebr Krime t\u00eb R\u00ebnda. Relator i kolegjit penal q\u00eb shqyrton k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje \u00ebsht\u00eb caktuar gjyqtari Sand\u00ebr Simoni.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

M\u00eb dat\u00eb 20.02.2024, gjyqtari Sand\u00ebr Simoni ka paraqitur para Kryetarit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb nj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb p\u00ebr heqjen dor\u00eb nga shqyrtimi i k\u00ebsaj \u00e7\u00ebshtjeje, pasi ka vler\u00ebsuar se \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb kushtet e nenit 17, shkronja \u201cc\u201d dhe \u201c\u00eb\u201d t\u00eb Kodit t\u00eb Procedur\u00ebs Penale.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Kryetari i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, me vendimin e dat\u00ebs 26.02.2024, ka vendosur: \u201cRefuzimin e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs s\u00eb an\u00ebtarit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, z. Sand\u00ebr Simoni, p\u00ebr heqjen dor\u00eb nga gjykimi i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes penale t\u00eb regjistruar pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, nr. 52105-00378-00-2019, dat\u00eb 05.04.2019\u201d.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

M\u00eb dat\u00eb 03.04.2024, gjyqtari Medi Bici, ka paraqitur para Kryetarit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb nj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb p\u00ebr heqjen dor\u00eb nga shqyrtimi i k\u00ebsaj \u00e7\u00ebshtjeje.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Kryetari i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, me vendimin e dat\u00ebs 17.04.2024, ka vendosur: \u201cRefuzimin e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs s\u00eb an\u00ebtarit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, z. Medi Bici, p\u00ebr heqjen dor\u00eb nga gjykimi i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes penale t\u00eb regjistruar pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, nr. 52105-00378-00-2019, dat\u00eb 05.04.2019\u201d.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

M\u00eb dat\u00eb 23.05.2024, i pandehuri i \u00ebsht\u00eb drejtuar Kryetarit t\u00eb Kolegjit Penal p\u00ebr nxjerrje t\u00eb kopje t\u00eb akteve e konkretisht: \u201c Deklarimin e heqjes dor\u00eb nga gjykimit t\u00eb gjyqtarit Sand\u00ebr Simoni\u201d dhe \u201cVendimin q\u00eb ka refuzuar dor\u00ebheqjen\u201d.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Pala k\u00ebrkuese i \u00ebsht\u00eb drejtuar Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb me k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn nr. 2807 prot., dat\u00eb 29.05.2024, duke k\u00ebrkuar p\u00ebrjashtimin e gjyqtar Sand\u00ebr Simoni nga trupa gjykuese q\u00eb do t\u00eb shqyrtoj\u00eb rekursin e depozituar prej tij.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

M\u00eb dat\u00eb 30.05.2024 nga ana e IEVP kan\u00eb njoftuar t\u00eb pandehurin p\u00ebr aktet procedurale t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuara nga Gjykata e Lart\u00eb.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

M\u00eb dat\u00ebn 31.05.2024 Gjykata e Lart\u00eb me vendimin nr. 00-2024-1019, lidhur me k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e t\u00eb pandehurit ka vendosur: \u201cMospranimin e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjashtimin e gjyqtarit Sand\u00ebr Simoni\u201d.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

M\u00eb dat\u00ebn 03.06.2024, Gjykata e Lart\u00eb me vendimin nr. 00-2024-1019 lidhur me k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e t\u00eb pandehurit ka vendosur: \u201cPranimin e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjashtimin e an\u00ebtarit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb z. Medi Bici nga gjykimi i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes penale\u201d.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Pala k\u00ebrkuese i \u00ebsht\u00eb drejtuar Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb me k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn nr. 2913 prot., dat\u00eb 04.06.2024, duke k\u00ebrkuar p\u00ebrjashtimin e gjyqtar Sand\u00ebr Simoni nga trupa gjykuese q\u00eb do t\u00eb shqyrtoj\u00eb rekursin e depozituar prej tij, duke pretenduar, nd\u00ebr t\u00eb tjera, se: \u201c Rezulton se gjyqtar z. Sand\u00ebr Simoni, n\u00eb faqen 4, paragrafi 2-5 t\u00eb deklarat\u00ebs nr. 964 prot., dat\u00eb 20.02.2024, p\u00ebr heqje dor\u00eb nga gjykimi i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes penale shprehimisht thot\u00eb;<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\u2013\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Me shkres\u00ebn e dat\u00ebs 10.07.2014, kam njoftuar Drejtorin\u00eb e P\u00ebrgjithshme t\u00eb Policis\u00eb s\u00eb Shtetit, Prokurorin\u00eb e P\u00ebrgjithshme dhe Ministrin\u00eb e Rendit Publik n\u00eb lidhje me k\u00ebrc\u00ebnimet ndaj avokat\u00ebve, gjyqtar\u00ebve, administrat\u00ebs, k\u00ebrc\u00ebnimet ndaj meje si drejtues gjykate duke referuar sjelljet e t\u00eb pandehurit dhe disa t\u00eb af\u00ebrmve t\u00eb tij. Referuar shkresave te m\u00ebsip\u00ebrme, vler\u00ebsoj se un\u00eb kam dh\u00ebn\u00eb mendim p\u00ebr zgjidhjen e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes dhe duke u referuar n\u00eb ve\u00e7anti shkresave t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 19.06.2013 dhe 10.07.2014, kam shkaqe t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme nj\u00ebanshm\u00ebrie n\u00eb gjykimin e k\u00ebtij rekursi si gjyqtar n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Lart\u00eb. N\u00eb k\u00ebto kushte vler\u00ebsoj se n\u00eb funksion t\u00eb nj\u00eb gjykimi t\u00eb drejt\u00eb e objektiv q\u00eb ofron garanci p\u00ebr pal\u00ebt, t\u00eb garantimit t\u00eb paanshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb gjyqtarit n\u00eb gjykim dhe p\u00ebr arsye etike, un\u00eb nuk mund t\u00eb jem gjyqtar i k\u00ebsaj \u00e7\u00ebshtjeje, pasi nuk p\u00ebrmbush kriterin objektiv t\u00eb paanshm\u00ebris\u00eb. Rekursuesi dhe personi i d\u00ebnuar jan\u00eb n\u00eb dijeni t\u00eb k\u00ebtyre fakteve dhe veprimeve t\u00eb mija e shkresave t\u00eb sip\u00ebrcituara.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\u2013\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Sa sip\u00ebr k\u00ebto fakte jo vet\u00ebm q\u00eb nuk kan\u00eb q\u00ebn\u00eb t\u00eb ditura n\u00eb dat\u00ebn 29.05.2024, koh\u00eb kur ai ka depozituar k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Lart\u00eb p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjashtimin e gjyqtarit Sand\u00ebr Simoni. Nj\u00ebanshm\u00ebria dhe shfaqja e mendimit mbi faktet dhe rrethanat objekt t\u00eb k\u00ebtij procedimi t\u00eb deklaruar nga vet\u00eb gjyqtari, nuk mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb nj\u00eb lapsus, por nj\u00eb bindje etiko-profesionale sepse \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb magjistrat i spikatur, me integritet dhe nuk mund t\u00eb gaboj\u00eb n\u00eb k\u00ebrkesat p\u00ebr heqje dor\u00eb nga gjykimi. Deklarimi i gjyqtarit p\u00ebr heqje dor\u00eb nga gjykimi i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes, n\u00ebnkupton ekzistenc\u00ebn e shkaqeve ligjore dhe bind\u00ebse p\u00ebr pamund\u00ebsin\u00eb e pjes\u00ebmarrjes s\u00eb tij n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb gjykim. Pavar\u00ebsisht k\u00ebsaj prove t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme dhe t\u00eb past\u00ebr nj\u00ebanshm\u00ebri, k\u00ebrkesa p\u00ebr heqje dor\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb pranuar, duke pretenduar p\u00ebr prova anshm\u00ebrie aktuale, kur nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb ky term nuk njihet nga Gjykata e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\u2013\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 N\u00eb k\u00ebto kushte a ka frik\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb madhe p\u00ebr paanshm\u00ebri kur gjyqtari kall\u00ebzon n\u00eb polici t\u00eb pandehurin q\u00eb po gjykon dhe familjar\u00ebt e tij p\u00ebr k\u00ebrc\u00ebnime ndaj avokat\u00ebve, gjyqtar\u00ebve, administrat\u00ebs, pavar\u00ebsisht se ka ndodhur n\u00eb 2014?. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb kontekst fakti q\u00eb Kryetari i Gjykat\u00ebs k\u00ebrkon prova aktuale vjen n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me jurisprudenc\u00ebn e Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese se \u201ce drejta p\u00ebr t\u2019u gjykuar nga nj\u00eb gjykat\u00eb e paanshme k\u00ebrkon q\u00eb drejt\u00ebsia jo vet\u00ebm t\u00eb b\u00ebhet por edhe t\u00eb duket\u201d. N\u00eb zbatim t\u00eb k\u00ebtij parimi do t\u00eb duhet t\u00eb kalohen t\u00eb dy testet si subjektiv dhe ai objektiv<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Pas regjistrimit n\u00eb Gjykat\u00eb t\u00eb Lart\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs n\u00eb dat\u00ebs 04.06.2024 \u201cP\u00ebr p\u00ebrjashtimin e Sand\u00ebr Simoni nga gjykimi i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes nr. akti 52105-00378-00-2019, n\u00eb ngarkim t\u00eb t\u00eb pandehurit Dritan Dajti, t\u00eb paraqitur nga i pandehuri Dritan Dajti n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet avokat mbrojt\u00ebs t\u00eb zgjedhur prej tij Alban Kapxhiu, bazuar n\u00eb nenin 1\/1 i nenit 21 t\u00eb KPP ku parashikohet se: \u201cGjyqtari\u00a0 p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilin\u00a0 \u00ebsht\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar p\u00ebrjashtimi paraqet me shkrim mendimin e tij mbi k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjashtim\u201d, gjyqtari Sand\u00ebr Simoni ka paraqitur mendimin e tij me shkrim me nr. 2949\/1 prot., dat\u00eb 05.06.2024 n\u00eb lidhje me k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjashtim, ku ka parashtruar se:\u00a0 \u201cSi prov\u00eb mbi t\u00eb cil\u00ebn pala k\u00ebrkuese paraqet k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr dor\u00ebheqje, paraqet nj\u00eb shkres\u00eb t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 10.07.2014. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb un\u00eb i jam drejtuar organeve kompetente n\u00eb lidhje me k\u00ebrc\u00ebnimet ndaj avokat\u00ebv\u00eb, gjyqtar\u00ebve, administrat\u00ebs, k\u00ebrc\u00ebnimet ndaj meje si drejtues gjykate duke referuar sjelljet e t\u00eb pandehurit Dritan Dajti dhe disa t\u00eb af\u00ebrm\u00ebve t\u00eb tij. Un\u00eb e kam p\u00ebrmendur k\u00ebt\u00eb shkres\u00eb nd\u00ebr t\u00eb tjera si nj\u00eb nga shkaqet mbi t\u00eb cilat kam paraqitur k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn time p\u00ebr dor\u00ebheqje duke e konsideruar p\u00ebrmbajtjen e saj si nj\u00eb shfaqje mendimi mbi objektin e procedimit e shkak nj\u00ebnashm\u00ebrie n\u00eb gjykim n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 17 shkronja c dhe \u00eb t\u00eb KPP. Si\u00e7 e kam deklaruar dhe n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr dor\u00ebheqje k\u00ebto veprime n\u00eb ushtrim t\u00eb detyr\u00ebs si Kryetar Gjykate n\u00eb at\u00eb koh\u00eb, k\u00ebrkesat dhe shkresat institucioneve, par\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrmbajtje t\u00eb tyre, t\u00eb vler\u00ebsuara n\u00eb kushtet e sotme si gjyqtar n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Lart\u00eb q\u00eb shqyrton rekursin e Prokuroris\u00eb s\u00eb Apelit\u00a0 t\u00eb Krimeve t\u00eb R\u00ebnda, ndaj vendimit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit p\u00ebr Krime\u00a0 t\u00eb R\u00ebnda, mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebjn\u00eb mendim p\u00ebr objektin e procedimit dhe shkak nj\u00ebanshm\u00ebrie t\u00eb gjyqtarit n\u00eb gjykim p\u00ebrderisa lidhen me sigurimin e mbrojt\u00ebsit ligjor t\u00eb caktuar kryesisht n\u00eb seanc\u00eb gjyq\u00ebsore t\u00eb gjykimit t\u00eb t\u00eb pandehurit e q\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebn dhe objekt t\u00eb rekursit t\u00eb paraqitur n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast. N\u00eb k\u00ebto kushte un\u00eb vler\u00ebsoj se n\u00eb funksion t\u00eb nj\u00eb gjykimi t\u00eb drejt\u00eb\u00a0 e objektiv q\u00eb ofron garanci p\u00ebr\u00a0 pal\u00ebt, t\u00eb garantimit t\u00eb parimit t\u00eb paanshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb gjyqtarit n\u00eb gjykim,\u00a0\u00a0 dhe p\u00ebr arsye etike, un\u00eb nuk mund t\u00eb jem\u00a0 gjyqtar i k\u00ebsaj \u00e7\u00ebshtjeje dhe k\u00ebrkesa p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjashtimin tim nga gjykimi i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes duhet pranuar. Kjo p\u00ebr vet\u00eb rolin q\u00eb Gjykata e Lart\u00eb ka n\u00eb hierarkin\u00eb e sistemit gjyqsor si instanca m\u00eb e lart\u00eb dhe e fundit e gjykimit q\u00eb vulos dhe fatin e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes penale e q\u00eb nuk duhet t\u00eb l\u00ebr\u00eb shteg p\u00ebr\u00a0 munges\u00eb objektiviteti e paanshm\u00ebrie n\u00eb gjykim n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr tu gjykuar nga nj\u00eb gjykat\u00eb e pavarur e e paanshme si elementi kryesor i parimit t\u00eb procesit t\u00eb rregullt ligjor. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye\u00a0 vler\u00ebsoj se jan\u00eb rastet e parashikuar n\u00eb\u00a0 nenin 17 shkronja c) dhe\u00a0 \u00eb) t\u00eb tij, pika\u00a0 B. Parimi i paanshm\u00ebris\u00eb\u00a0 pika 7\/a dhe d\/ t\u00eb Kodit t\u00eb Etik\u00ebs Gjyqsore, p\u00ebr tu konsideruar si shfaqje mendimi\u00a0 mbi objektin e\u00a0 procedimi \/ \u00e7\u00ebshtjen n\u00eb gjykim sot dhe shkaqe nj\u00ebanshm\u00ebrie n\u00eb gjykim, q\u00eb dhe m\u00eb kan\u00eb detyruar mua fillimisht para k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjashtim, t\u00eb heq dor\u00eb nga\u00a0 gjykimi i k\u00ebtij rekursi\u00a0 si an\u00ebtar i trupit gjykues q\u00eb\u00a0 e shqyrton k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje, e q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb dhe nj\u00eb nga shkaqet e ngritur n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjashtim.\u201d<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Gjykata \u00e7mon t\u00eb nevojshme t\u00eb theksoj\u00eb se gjykimi nga nj\u00eb gjykat\u00eb e paanshme \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb nga elementet e r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme t\u00eb procesit t\u00eb rregullt ligjor, i garantuar nga neni 42 i Kushtetut\u00ebs dhe neni 6 i KEDNJ-s\u00eb. Parimi i paanshm\u00ebris\u00eb n\u00ebnkupton munges\u00ebn e paragjykimeve nga gjyqtar\u00ebt p\u00ebr \u00e7\u00ebshtjen e shtruar p\u00ebrpara tyre dhe q\u00eb ata t\u00eb mos veprojn\u00eb n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb till\u00eb q\u00eb t\u00eb ndihmojn\u00eb interesat e nj\u00ebr\u00ebs prej pal\u00ebve. Nj\u00eb gjykat\u00eb duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb e paanshme jo vet\u00ebm formalisht, por edhe n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb shprehur. E drejta p\u00ebr t\u2019u gjykuar p\u00ebrpara nj\u00eb gjykate kompetente, t\u00eb pavarur dhe t\u00eb paanshme, t\u00eb caktuar me ligj, k\u00ebrkon q\u00eb drejt\u00ebsia jo vet\u00ebm duhet t\u00eb b\u00ebhet, por ajo, gjithashtu, duhet t\u00eb shikohet q\u00eb b\u00ebhet (shih vendimin nr.25, dat\u00eb 11.06.2013 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese).<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

N\u00eb praktik\u00ebn e konsoliduar t\u00eb GJEDNJ-s\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb marr\u00eb n\u00eb analiz\u00eb standardi i gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb paanshme duke u evidentuar dy aspekte t\u00eb tij, testi objektiv dhe testi subjektiv. Mund t\u00eb b\u00ebhet nj\u00eb dallim n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb kontekst midis nj\u00eb qasje subjektive q\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebn p\u00ebrpjekjen p\u00ebr t\u00eb konstatuar bindjen personale t\u00eb nj\u00eb gjyqtari t\u00eb caktuar n\u00eb nj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb caktuar, dhe nj\u00eb qasje objektive q\u00eb n\u00ebnkupton p\u00ebrcaktimin n\u00ebse ai ofron garanci t\u00eb mjaftueshme p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrjashtuar \u00e7do dyshim legjitim p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb q\u00ebllim\u00a0 (shih \u00e7\u00ebshtjen Piersack k. Belgjik\u00ebs, & 30; Micallef k. Malt\u00ebs, & 99, etj.).<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

P\u00ebrsa i p\u00ebrket paanshm\u00ebris\u00eb subjektive, vlen rregulli se paanshm\u00ebria subjektive, personale e nj\u00eb gjyqtari t\u00eb em\u00ebruar, prezumohet derisa t\u00eb ket\u00eb prova p\u00ebr t\u00eb kund\u00ebrt\u00ebn. Nga ana tjet\u00ebr, n\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb testit t\u00eb objektivitetit duhet t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktohet n\u00ebse, p\u00ebrve\u00e7 faktit t\u00eb sjelljes personale t\u00eb gjyqtarit, ekzistojn\u00eb fakte t\u00eb v\u00ebrtetueshme q\u00eb mund t\u00eb ngren\u00eb dyshime p\u00ebrsa i p\u00ebrket paanshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb t\u0133. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb kuad\u00ebr edhe dukja e pavar\u00ebsis\u00eb objektive mund t\u00eb ket\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsin\u00eb e vet. Kur vler\u00ebsohet n\u00ebse n\u00eb nj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje konkrete ka nj\u00eb arsye t\u00eb p\u00ebrligjur q\u00eb rrezikon paanshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e nj\u00eb trupi gjykues, k\u00ebndv\u00ebshtrimi i atyre q\u00eb paraqesin k\u00ebt\u00eb pretendim ka r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi, por vendimtar mbetet p\u00ebrcaktimi n\u00ebse ky dyshim \u00ebsht\u00eb objektivisht i justifikuesh\u00ebm.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

N\u00eb frym\u00ebn e k\u00ebtyre parimev dhe n\u00eb respektim t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj jurisprudence t\u00eb GJEDNJ-s\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb trajtuar k\u00ebrkesa e m\u00ebparshme e k\u00ebrkuesit, p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjashtim gjyqtari, e par\u00eb n\u00eb lidhje t\u00eb ngusht\u00eb me k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr dor\u00ebheqje t\u00eb gjyqtarit t\u00eb paraqitur tek Kryetari i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Duke iu riktthyer \u00e7\u00ebshtjes n\u00eb shqyrtim rezulton se e nj\u00ebjta k\u00ebrkes\u00eb e t\u00eb pandehurit Dritan Dajti dhe e n\u00ebnshkruar prej tij dhe avokatit Alban Kapxhiu, q\u00eb mban t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn dat\u00eb 04.06.2024, ka ardhur n\u00eb rrug\u00eb postare n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Lart\u00eb dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb protokolluar me nr. 2913\/1 prot., dat\u00eb 05.06.2024.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Gjykata pasi shqyrtoi n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen arrin n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se k\u00ebrkesa e dat\u00ebs 04.06.2024, e paraqitur nga i pandehuri Dritan Dajti dhe mbrojt\u00ebsi i tij, p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjashtimin e gjyqtarit Sand\u00ebr Simoni, nuk duhet t\u00eb pranohet pasi n\u00eb thelb p\u00ebrmban t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtat shkaqe me ato t\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs s\u00eb dat\u00ebs 29.05.2024, e cila nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb pranuar me vendimin gjyq\u00ebsor t\u00eb form\u00ebs s\u00eb prer\u00eb t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 31.05.2024.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

K\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr dor\u00ebheqje t\u00eb gjyqtarit Sand\u00ebr Simoni dhe refuzimin e k\u00ebsaj k\u00ebrkese nga Kryetari i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, k\u00ebrkuesi e ka paraqitur si shkak p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjashtimin e k\u00ebtij gjyqtari edhe n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e dat\u00ebs 29.05.2024 ( faqet 10, 11 dhe 12 t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj k\u00ebrkese).<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

M\u00eb konkretisht, n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e dat\u00ebs 29.05.2024, nd\u00ebr t\u00eb tjera, \u00ebsht\u00eb pararshtruar: \u201cSi\u00e7 rezulton n\u00eb fakt, gjyqtari Sand\u00ebr Simoni n\u00eb dat\u00ebn 02.02.2024 i ka dor\u00ebzuar Kryetarit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, deklarimin p\u00ebr heqjen dor\u00eb nga gjykimi i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes penale me nr.521055-00378-00-19 n\u00eb ngarkim t\u00eb t\u00eb pandehurit Dritan Dajti, Sa m\u00eb sip\u00ebr duke qen\u00eb se Gjykata e Lart\u00eb jep p\u00ebrfundimisht drejt\u00ebsin\u00eb penale, gjyqtar\u00ebt e saj jo vet\u00ebm q\u00eb jan\u00eb magjistrat\u00eb t\u00eb spikatur dhe me integritet por edhe me nj\u00eb nivel t\u00eb lart\u00eb etiko-profesional, \u00e7ka do t\u00eb thot\u00eb q\u00eb n\u00ebse ata deklarojn\u00eb dor\u00ebheqjen nga gjykimi, kan\u00eb arye ligjore dhe prova bind\u00ebse p\u00ebr pamund\u00ebsin\u00eb e vazhdimit t\u00eb pjes\u00ebmarrjes n\u00eb gjykim, pavar\u00ebsisht faktit q\u00eb vendimmarrja p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb dor\u00ebheqje i mbetet Kryetarit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb.Pra fakti q\u00eb gjyqtari Sand\u00ebr Simoni ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb dor\u00ebheqjen, do t\u00eb thot\u00eb se ai gjendet p\u00ebrball\u00eb nj\u00eb ose disa shkaqeve ligjore q\u00eb provojn\u00eb ndalimin e qenies s\u00eb tij si gjyqtar n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje, t\u00eb parashikuara nga neni 17 i Kodit t\u00eb Procedur\u00ebs Penale. Nisur nga sa m\u00eb sip\u00ebr, mospranimi nga Kryetari i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb i dor\u00ebheqjes s\u00eb gjyqtarit Sand\u00ebr Simoni, i ka hapur rrug\u00ebn t\u00eb pandehurit Dritan Dajti dhe mbrojt\u00ebsve t\u00eb tij, p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar p\u00ebrjashtimin e k\u00ebtij gjyqtari nga gjykimi i k\u00ebsaj \u00e7\u00ebshtjeje n\u00eb respekt dhe n\u00eb zbatim t\u00ebnenit 18 t\u00eb K.Pr.Penale\u201d.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Ky shkak p\u00ebrjashtimi i pretenduar n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e dat\u00ebs 29.05.2024 rezulton t\u00eb jet\u00eb trajtuar dhe t\u00eb jet\u00eb vler\u00ebsuar, si i pabazuar, n\u00eb vendimin e form\u00ebs s\u00eb prer\u00eb t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 31.05.2024 ku \u00ebsht\u00eb disponuar p\u00ebr mospranimin e saj, sipas k\u00ebsaj m\u00ebnyre arsyetimi: \u201cGjykata vler\u00ebson se fakti q\u00eb edhe vet\u00eb gjyqtari ka paraqitur m\u00eb par\u00eb, nj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb p\u00ebr heqje dor\u00eb nga gjykimi, nuk do t\u00eb thot\u00eb se ai duhet p\u00ebrjashtuar nga gjykimi sepse ka deklaruar vet\u00eb se ai gjendet p\u00ebrball\u00eb nj\u00eb ose disa shkaqeve q\u00eb provojn\u00eb ndalimin e q\u00ebnies s\u00eb tij si gjyqtar i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes.Paraqitja e dor\u00ebheqjes nga gjyqtari apo dh\u00ebnia e mendimit t\u00eb tij n\u00eb favor \u00eb p\u00ebrjashtimit t\u00eb tij, nuk jan\u00eb element t\u00eb mjaftuesh\u00ebm p\u00ebr t\u00eb diponuar n\u00eb favor t\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs, por duhet marr\u00eb n\u00eb shqyrtim elementi objektiv apo subjektiv q\u00eb v\u00eb n\u00eb dyshim paan\u00ebsin\u00eb e gjyqtarit\u2026\u2026K\u00ebrkesa e paraqitur m\u00eb par\u00eb nga gjyqtari dhe q\u00ebndrimi i mbajtur prej tij n\u00eb lidhje me k\u00ebt\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb, nuk tregojn\u00eb p\u00ebr shkaqe subjektive apo element objektiv, sipas t\u00eb cilave gjyqtari t\u00eb mos ofroj\u00eb garanci t\u00eb mjaftueshme p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrjashtur \u00e7do dyshim legjitim t\u00eb anshm\u00ebris\u00eb\u201d.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Si shkak i ri n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn objekt shqyrtimi pretendohet p\u00ebmbajtja konkrete e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs p\u00ebr dor\u00ebheqje e gjyqtarit Sand\u00ebr Simoni n\u00eb lidhje me dy rrethana specifike t\u00eb pohuara nga gjyqtari dhe q\u00eb kan\u00eb t\u00eb b\u00ebjn\u00eb me shkresat e dat\u00ebs 19.06.2013 dhe 10.07.2014, t\u00eb n\u00ebnshkruara nga gjyqtari dhe t\u00eb d\u00ebrguara n\u00eb adres\u00eb t\u00eb organeve t\u00eb tjera ligjzbatuese n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb ushtrimit t\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebs veprimtari administarive t\u00eb kryer prej tij n\u00eb at\u00eb periudh\u00eb kohore, gjat\u00eb ushtrimit t\u00eb detyr\u00ebs dhe n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me kompetencat e tij ligjore si Kryetar i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb p\u00ebr Krime t\u00eb R\u00ebnda.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

N\u00eb lidhje me k\u00ebto rrethana t\u00eb reja, p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilat k\u00ebrkuesi pretendon se nuk ka qen\u00eb i njohur m\u00eb pare, Gjykata vler\u00ebson se ato nuk mund t\u00eb konsiderohet se p\u00ebrmbajn\u00eb element\u00ebt e nj\u00eb shkaku t\u00eb ri apo t\u00eb pavaruar p\u00ebrjashtimi, pasi shkaku i p\u00ebrjashtimit n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb dhe i vet\u00ebm, ai q\u00eb ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me ekzistenc\u00ebn e arsyeve t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme t\u00eb nj\u00ebanshm\u00ebris\u00eb, t\u00eb evidentuara n\u00eb faktin e paraqitjes s\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs p\u00ebr dor\u00ebheqje nga gjyqtari dhe refuzimin e k\u00ebsaj k\u00ebrkes\u00eb nga Kryetari i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb.N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb kuptim, nuk mund t\u00eb ket\u00eb trajtim apo vler\u00ebsim t\u00eb diferencuar t\u00eb \u00e7do pohimi t\u00eb ve\u00e7ant\u00eb t\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb nga gjyqtari n\u00eb k\u00ebrkesen p\u00ebr dor\u00ebheqje, p\u00ebr sa koh\u00eb q\u00eb ato jan\u00eb t\u00eb lidhura n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb pandashme me shkakun e dor\u00ebheqjes, nj\u00ebherazi si shkak p\u00ebrjashtimi, n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsin\u00eb e tij.P\u00ebrderisa ky shkak me t\u00ebr\u00ebsin\u00eb e rrethanave n\u00eb p\u00ebrmbajtje t\u00eb tij \u00ebsht\u00eb shqyrtuar m\u00eb par\u00eb me vendim gjyq\u00ebsor t\u00eb form\u00ebs s\u00eb prer\u00eb, do t\u00eb binte ndesh me parimin e \u201cgj\u00ebs\u00eb s\u00eb gjykuar\u201d, rip\u00ebrs\u00ebritja e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjashtim p\u00ebr t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtat shkaqe.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Nga ana tjet\u00ebr, rezulton se pavar\u00ebsisht se n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e m\u00ebparshm\u00eb t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 29.05.2024, k\u00ebrkuesi nuk referon n\u00eb p\u00ebrmbajtjen konkrete t\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs p\u00ebr dor\u00ebheqje t\u00eb gjyqtarit n\u00eb lidhje me k\u00ebto dy shkresa, p\u00ebrmbajtja e tyre \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb e ditur n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet mendimit me shkrim t\u00eb paraqitur nga gjyqtari Sand\u00ebr Simoni sipas shkres\u00ebs nr.2836 prot, dat\u00eb 30.05.2024, q\u00eb n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 21, pika 1\/1 e KPP, ka qen\u00eb objekt shqyrtimi dhe vler\u00ebsimi gjat\u00eb gjykimit t\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs s\u00eb m\u00ebparshme t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 29.05.2024.P\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, dhe n\u00eb referim t\u00eb nj\u00eb fakti t\u00eb till\u00eb, citimi i k\u00ebtyre dy shkresave sipas p\u00ebrmbajtjes s\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs p\u00ebr dor\u00ebheqje, nuk mund t\u00eb konsiderohet se p\u00ebrb\u00ebn nj\u00eb shkak t\u00eb ri p\u00ebrjashtimi, t\u00eb pashqyrtuar n\u00eb gjykimin e map\u00ebrsh\u00ebm.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

N\u00eb nenin 22\/3 t\u00eb KPP p\u00ebrcaktohet shprehimisht: \u201cGjykata pasi merr t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat e nevojshme, vendos p\u00ebr k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e p\u00ebrjashtsimit brenda 48 or\u00ebve nga paraqitja e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs\u201d.Gjykata vler\u00ebson se me togfjal\u00ebshin \u201ct\u00eb dh\u00ebnat e nevojshme\u201d, n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj dispozite, do t\u00eb kuptohet edhe mendimi me shkrim i dh\u00ebn\u00eb nga gjyqtari p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilin b\u00ebhet k\u00ebrkesa p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjahtsim sipas nenit 21, pika 1\/1 e k\u00ebtij Kodi.P\u00ebr sa koh\u00eb mendimi me shkrim i gjyqtarit p\u00ebr k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs e dat\u00ebs 29.05.20124 referon n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb shprehur edhe tek rrethanat e pretenduara si t\u00eb reja nga k\u00ebrkuesi, at\u00ebher\u00eb n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb pashmangshme p\u00ebrmbajtja t\u00ebr\u00ebsore e k\u00ebtij mendimi duke p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb edhe k\u00ebto rrethana, kan\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat e nevojshme ku gjykata \u00ebshtt\u00eb bazuar n\u00eb dh\u00ebnien e vendimit t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 31.05.2024, p\u00ebr mospranimin e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs s\u00eb p\u00ebrjashtimit t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 29.05.2024.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

P\u00ebr sa i p\u00ebrket referimit t\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb nga k\u00ebrkuesi n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn objekt shqyrtimi tek vendimi i dat\u00ebs 03.06.2024, p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjashtimin nga gykimi i t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebs \u00e7\u00ebshtje penale, i gjyqtarit Medi Bici, Gjykata \u00e7mon ky vendim nuk mund t\u00eb ket\u00eb efekte detyruese p\u00ebr rastin n\u00eb gjykim pasi k\u00ebrkesat kan\u00eb objekt dhe shkak t\u00eb ndrysh\u00ebm.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

N\u00eb kushtet kur, k\u00ebrkesa mbi baz\u00ebn e arsyeve t\u00eb m\u00ebsip\u00ebrme u vler\u00ebsua se p\u00ebrb\u00ebn nj\u00eb rip\u00ebrs\u00ebritje, p\u00ebr t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtat shkaqe, e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs s\u00eb m\u00ebparshme t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 29.05.2024, q\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb pranuar me vendim gjyq\u00ebsor t\u00eb form\u00ebs s\u00eb prer\u00eb, at\u00ebher\u00eb gjykata \u00e7mon se \u00ebsht\u00eb rasti p\u00ebr zbatimin e gjob\u00ebs ndaj k\u00ebrkuesit n\u00eb mas\u00ebn 10 000 ( dhjet\u00ebmij\u00eb) lek\u00eb, si sanksion i parashikuar nga neni 22\/a i KPP, p\u00ebr rastin e abuzimit me t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar p\u00ebrjashtimin e gjyqtarit.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

P\u00cbR K\u00cbTO ARSYE,<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Bazuar n\u00eb nenin 21\/2 Kodit t\u00eb Procedur\u00ebs Penale,<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

V E N D O S I:<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\u2013\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Mospranimin e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjashtimin e gjyqtarit Sand\u00ebr Simoni nga gjykimi i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes penale t\u00eb regjistruar pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, nr. 52105-00378-00-2019, dat\u00eb 05.04.2019.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\u2013\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Zbatimin e gjob\u00ebs ndaj k\u00ebrkuesit n\u00eb mas\u00ebn 10 000 ( dhjet\u00ebmij\u00eb) lek\u00eb<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\u2013\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Ky vendim \u00ebsht\u00eb i form\u00ebs s\u00eb prer\u00eb<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\u2013\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Nje kopje e ketij vendimi t\u2019u njoftohet pal\u00ebve n\u00eb proces.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\u2013\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Nje kopje e ketij vendimi t\u2019i komunikohet gjyqtarit Sand\u00ebr Simoni.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Tiran\u00eb m\u00eb 06.06.2024<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Gjykata e Lart\u00eb ka rr\u00ebzuar k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e Dritan Dajtit, p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjashtimin e gjyqtarit Sand\u00ebr Simoni nga \u00e7\u00ebshtja e tij. K\u00ebrkesa u rr\u00ebzua nga gjyqtari Enton Dhimitri. Dajti kishte k\u00ebrkuar n\u00eb GJL p\u00ebrjashtimin nga trupa gjykuese t\u00eb Simonit, me arsyetimin se ai \u00ebsht\u00eb i nj\u00ebansh\u00ebm. Kujtojm\u00eb se Dritan Dajti ndodhet n\u00eb burg, i akuzuar p\u00ebr vrasjen […]<\/p>\n","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"author":32,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-680043","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-lajme"],"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"link","format":"url"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/680043","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=680043"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/680043\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=680043"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=680043"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=680043"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}