{"id":657101,"date":"2024-02-26T17:51:59","date_gmt":"2024-02-26T16:51:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/?p=657101"},"modified":"2024-02-26T17:51:59","modified_gmt":"2024-02-26T16:51:59","slug":"shfuqizimi-i-pjesshem-i-ligjit-per-studentet-e-mjekesise-zbardhet-vendimi-i-plote-i-gjykates-kushtetuese","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/2024\/02\/26\/shfuqizimi-i-pjesshem-i-ligjit-per-studentet-e-mjekesise-zbardhet-vendimi-i-plote-i-gjykates-kushtetuese\/","title":{"rendered":"Shfuqizimi i pjessh\u00ebm i ligjit p\u00ebr student\u00ebt e mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb, zbardhet vendimi i plot\u00eb i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese","gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"text"}]},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/span><\/p>\n

Gjykata Kushtetuese ka zbuluar dit\u00ebn e sotme arsyetimin lidhur me vendimin p\u00ebr shfuqizimin e pjes\u00ebsh t\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb qeveris\u00eb p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsimin e detyruar t\u00eb mjek\u00ebve t\u00eb rinj t\u00eb dal\u00eb nga Fakulteti i Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb p\u00ebr nj\u00eb periudh\u00eb disa-vje\u00e7are.<\/span><\/p>\n

Gjykata thekson se: \u201cN\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb testit t\u00eb proporcionalitetit, Gjykata ka konstatuar, gjithashtu, se neni 6 i ligjit ka ometim ligjor. Ometimi ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me munges\u00ebn e kritereve objektive t\u00eb pun\u00ebsimit me prioritet, trajtimin financiar n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb sigurimit t\u00eb mjeteve t\u00eb nevojshme t\u00eb jetes\u00ebs, sipas nenit 49 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, si dhe p\u00ebrllogaritjen e periudh\u00ebs n\u00eb pritje n\u00eb koh\u00ebzgjatjen e detyrimit p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim. Gjykata e analizoi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen edhe n\u00eb k\u00ebndv\u00ebshtrimin e parimit t\u00eb siguris\u00eb juridike dhe t\u00eb barazis\u00eb para ligjit\u201d.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Ajo i ka k\u00ebrkuar Kuvendit q\u00eb t\u00eb ndryshoj\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb ligj, duke ulur afatet dhe se ndryshimet duhet t\u00eb miratohen brenda 3 muajve.<\/span><\/p>\n

Vendimi i plot\u00eb:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Vendim nr. 1 dat\u00eb 25.01.2024<\/span>
\n(V-1\/24)<\/span>
\nGjykata Kushtetuese e Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb, e p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00eb nga: Holta Za\u00e7aj,<\/span>
\nKryetare, Marsida Xhaferllari, Fiona Papajorgji, Elsa Toska, Sonila Bejtja, Sand\u00ebr Beci, Ilir<\/span>
\nToska, Genti Ibrahimi, Marjana Semini, an\u00ebtar\u00eb, me sekretare Enina Kotoni, n\u00eb dat\u00ebn 21.12.2023<\/span>
\nmori n\u00eb shqyrtim n\u00eb seanc\u00eb plenare publike \u00e7\u00ebshtjen nr. 1 (Nj) 2023 t\u00eb Regjistrit Themeltar, q\u00eb u<\/span>
\np\u00ebrket:<\/span>
\nK\u00cbRKUES: NJ\u00cb GRUP DEPUTET\u00cbSH T\u00cb KUVENDIT T\u00cb<\/strong><\/span>
\nREPUBLIK\u00cbS S\u00cb SHQIP\u00cbRIS\u00cb (JO M\u00cb PAK SE NJ\u00cb E<\/strong><\/span>
\nPESTA E DEPUTET\u00cbVE)<\/strong>, p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuar nga avokat\u00ebt Semir Sali<\/span>
\ndhe Esmeralda Maillard (Ndoci), me autorizim.<\/span>
\nNJ\u00cb GRUP STUDENT\u00cbSH T\u00cb FAKULTETIT T\u00cb<\/strong><\/span>
\nMJEK\u00cbSIS\u00cb T\u00cb UNIVERSITETIT T\u00cb MJEK\u00cbSIS\u00cb<\/strong><\/span>
\nTIRAN\u00cb<\/strong>, p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuar nga avokat\u00ebt Semir Sali dhe Esmeralda<\/span>
\nMaillard, me prokur\u00eb t\u00eb posa\u00e7me.<\/span>
\nSUBJEKTE T\u00cb INTERESUARA:<\/strong><\/span>
\nKUVENDI I REPUBLIK\u00cbS S\u00cb SHQIP\u00cbRIS\u00cb<\/strong>, p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuar nga<\/span>
\nMimoza Arbi dhe Gazmend Bici, me autorizim.<\/span>
\nK\u00cbSHILLI I MINISTRAVE<\/strong>, p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuar nga Herald Jonuzaj,<\/span>
\nVoltisa Ko\u00e7i dhe avokatja e shtetit Irma Qosja, me autorizim.<\/span>
\nOBJEKTI: Shfuqizimi i nenit 4, pikat 1, shkronja \u201cc\u201d, 2, shkronja \u201cb\u201d, 3,<\/span>
\nshkronja \u201cb\u201d dhe nenit 5, fjalia e par\u00eb, t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023,<\/span>
\ndat\u00eb 21.07.2023 \u201cP\u00ebr trajtimin e ve\u00e7ant\u00eb t\u00eb student\u00ebve q\u00eb<\/span>
\nndjekin programin e integruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb<\/span>
\n\u201cMjek\u00ebsi e p\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb institucionet publike t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nlart\u00eb\u201d, si t\u00eb papajtuesh\u00ebm me Kushtetut\u00ebn e Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb<\/span>
\nShqip\u00ebris\u00eb.<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/strong><\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues:<\/strong>\u00a0Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nPezullimi i zbatimit t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023, dat\u00eb 21.07.2023 \u201cP\u00ebr<\/span>
\ntrajtimin e ve\u00e7ant\u00eb t\u00eb student\u00ebve q\u00eb ndjekin programin e<\/span>
\nintegruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e p\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d<\/span>
\nn\u00eb institucionet publike t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb\u201d, deri n\u00eb hyrjen n\u00eb<\/span>
\nfuqi t\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese.<\/span>
\nBAZA LIGJORE:<\/strong>\u00a0Nenet 4, 17, 18, 26, 49, 57, 131, pika 1, shkronjat \u201ca\u201d dhe \u201cf\u201d<\/span>
\ndhe 134, pika 1, shkronjat \u201cc\u201d dhe \u201ci\u201d, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs s\u00eb<\/span>
\nRepublik\u00ebs s\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb (Kushtetuta); nenet 4 dhe 14 t\u00eb<\/span>
\nKonvent\u00ebs Evropiane p\u00ebr t\u00eb Drejtat e Njeriut (KEDNJ) dhe<\/span>
\nneni 2 i Protokollit nr. 1 t\u00eb saj; ligji nr. 8577, dat\u00eb 10.02.2000<\/span>
\n\u201cP\u00ebr organizimin dhe funksionimin e Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese t\u00eb<\/span>
\nRepublik\u00ebs s\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb\u201d, i ndryshuar (ligji nr. 8577\/2000).<\/span>
\nGJYKATA KUSHTETUESE,<\/span>
\npasi d\u00ebgjoi relatoren e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes Marjana Semini, mori n\u00eb shqyrtim parashtrimet me<\/span>
\nshkrim t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuesve, q\u00eb kan\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar pranimin e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs, prap\u00ebsimet me shkrim t\u00eb subjekteve<\/span>
\nt\u00eb interesuara, Kuvendit t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb (Kuvendi) dhe K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Ministrave, q\u00eb<\/span>
\nkan\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar rr\u00ebzimin e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs, mendimet me shkrim t\u00eb Komisionerit p\u00ebr Mbrojtjen nga<\/span>
\nDiskriminimi (Komisioneri) dhe t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb (UMT), si dhe diskutoi<\/span>
\n\u00e7\u00ebshtjen n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsi,<\/span>
\nV \u00cb R E N:<\/strong><\/span>
\nI<\/span>
\nRrethanat e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes<\/span>
\n1. N\u00eb dat\u00ebn 21.07.2023 Kuvendi, n\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb propozimit t\u00eb K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Ministrave dhe n\u00eb<\/span>
\nzbatim t\u00eb procedur\u00ebs s\u00eb p\u00ebrshpejtuar parlamentare, ka miratuar ligjin nr. 60\/2023 \u201cP\u00ebr trajtimin e<\/span>
\nve\u00e7ant\u00eb t\u00eb student\u00ebve q\u00eb ndjekin programin e integruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e<\/span>
\np\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb institucionet publike t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb\u201d (ligji nr. 60\/2023). Ky ligj \u00ebsht\u00eb botuar<\/span>
\nn\u00eb Fletoren Zyrtare nr. 123, dat\u00eb 16.08.2023 dhe ka hyr\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi 15 dit\u00eb pas botimit t\u00eb tij.<\/span>
\n2. Duke pasur si q\u00ebllim ruajtjen e burimeve njer\u00ebzore, profesionist\u00ebve sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor\u00eb n\u00eb<\/span>
\nvend, por edhe rritjen e interesit t\u00eb tyre p\u00ebr t\u00eb punuar n\u00eb sektorin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor publik si pjes\u00eb e<\/span>
\nrritjes s\u00eb investimeve n\u00eb sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsi, ligji nr. 60\/2023 ka parashikuar nj\u00eb mekaniz\u00ebm p\u00ebrmes t\u00eb<\/span>
\ncilit, student\u00ebve q\u00eb ndjekin programin e integruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\np\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb institucionet publike t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb u ofrohet nj\u00eb trajtim i ve\u00e7ant\u00eb, i cili n\u00eb<\/span>
\nkuptim t\u00eb nenit 3, pika 1, t\u00eb ligjit, p\u00ebrfshin pun\u00ebsimin me prioritet t\u00eb tyre pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nstudimeve, si dhe t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrfituar nga programet sociale t\u00eb strehimit.<\/span>
\n3. Ky trajtim p\u00ebrfitohet si nga kandidati q\u00eb pranohet rishtazi n\u00eb programin e integruar t\u00eb<\/span>
\nstudimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e p\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb institucionet publike t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb,<\/span>
\nashtu edhe nga studenti i vitit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb deri n\u00eb vitin e kat\u00ebrt akademik dhe nga studenti i vitit t\u00eb<\/span>
\npest\u00eb ose t\u00eb gjasht\u00eb (student i nd\u00ebrmjet\u00ebm) n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb program, kur pranon t\u00eb n\u00ebnshkruaj\u00eb<\/span>
\nmarr\u00ebveshje me ministrin\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebse p\u00ebr arsimin, ministrin\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebse p\u00ebr sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsin\u00eb dhe<\/span>
\ninstitucionin e arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb publik. Sipas marr\u00ebveshjes, studenti duhet t\u00eb punoj\u00eb n\u00eb profesionin<\/span>
\ne mjekut pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb studimeve p\u00ebr, respektivisht, jo m\u00eb pak se pes\u00eb vjet, tre vjet dhe dy<\/span>
\nvjet n\u00eb institucionet sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore n\u00eb Republik\u00ebn e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb, si dhe pranon kalimin zyrtarisht t\u00eb<\/span>
\ndiplom\u00ebs p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb nga institucioni publik i arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb, ku ka p\u00ebrfunduar<\/span>
\nstudimet, n\u00eb institucionin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor ku pun\u00ebsohet deri n\u00eb \u201cshlyerjen e detyrimeve p\u00ebr<\/span>
\npun\u00ebsim\u201d sipas afatit, p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsisht pes\u00eb, tre dhe dyvje\u00e7ar, me t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn q\u00eb pas p\u00ebrmbushjes s\u00eb<\/span>
\ndetyrimit t\u00eb pun\u00ebsimit t\u00eb t\u00ebrheq\u00eb diplom\u00ebn universitare (neni 4, pika 1, shkronja \u201cc\u201d, pika 2,<\/span>
\nshkronja \u201cb\u201d, pika 3, shkronja \u201cb\u201d, i ligjit nr. 60\/2023). Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, studenti q\u00eb nuk pranon t\u00eb<\/span>
\nn\u00ebnshkruaj\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjen sipas p\u00ebrcaktimeve t\u00eb pikave 2 dhe 3 t\u00eb nenit 4, paguan vler\u00ebn e plot\u00eb<\/span>
\nt\u00eb kostos s\u00eb studimeve (neni 5 i ligjit nr. 60\/2023).<\/span>
\n4. P\u00ebr zbatimin e k\u00ebtyre masave jan\u00eb miratuar disa akte n\u00ebnligjore, p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsisht vendimi<\/span>
\nnr. 527, dat\u00eb 07.09.2023 i K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Ministrave p\u00ebr p\u00ebrcaktimin e metodologjis\u00eb s\u00eb kostos s\u00eb<\/span>
\nstudimeve p\u00ebr programin e integruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e p\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb<\/span>
\ninstitucionet publike t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb; vendimi qarkullues nr. 109, dat\u00eb 06.10.2023 i Senatit<\/span>
\nAkademik t\u00eb UMT-s\u00eb dhe vendimi nr. 62, dat\u00eb 09.10.2023 i Bordit t\u00eb Administrimit t\u00eb UMT-s\u00eb<\/span>
\np\u00ebr miratimin e kostos s\u00eb studimit t\u00eb programit t\u00eb integruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e<\/span>
\np\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb UMT. Sipas k\u00ebtyre akteve rezulton se kostoja e studimit t\u00eb programit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nintegruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e p\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d \u00ebsht\u00eb 248,975 (dyqind e dyzet e<\/span>
\ntet\u00eb mij\u00eb e n\u00ebnt\u00ebqind e shtat\u00ebdhjet\u00eb e pes\u00eb) lek\u00eb p\u00ebr student.<\/span>
\n5. N\u00eb dat\u00ebn 19.10.2023 nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit, n\u00eb cil\u00ebsin\u00eb e subjektit kushtetues<\/span>
\njo m\u00eb pak se nj\u00eb e pesta e deputet\u00ebve (k\u00ebrkuesi), i \u00ebsht\u00eb drejtuar Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese (Gjykata)<\/span>
\nme k\u00ebrkes\u00eb me objekt shfuqizimin e nenit 4, pikat 1, shkronja \u201cc\u201d, 2, shkronja \u201cb\u201d, 3, shkronja<\/span>
\n\u201cb\u201d dhe nenit 5, fjalia e par\u00eb, t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023, si dhe pezullimin e zbatimit t\u00eb tij deri n\u00eb hyrjen<\/span>
\nn\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb vendimit p\u00ebrfundimtar t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs.<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\n6. N\u00eb dat\u00ebn 20.10.2023 nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb UMT,<\/span>
\nkonkretisht shtetasit Anxhela Gjini, Alesia Cara, Diora Hoxha, Argisa Troka, Xhesika<\/span>
\nXhebexhiu, Juri Taullau, Sindy Allamani, Isabela Tabaku, Dea Guri, Natali Bliu, Joel Plaku,<\/span>
\nMikel Seferi, Reant Kullaj, Brunelio Fejzulla, Viki Za\u00e7lli, Rei Haluli, Feruze Agalliu, Oresti<\/span>
\n\u00c7a\u00e7a, Marjo Rabiaj, Paulo Qesargjoni, Endi Mu\u00e7i, Arb\u00ebri Shehu, Samuel D\u00ebrka, Thimi Shkarpa,<\/span>
\nKristina \u00c7elanji, Athina Prifti, Almira Tota, Zino Veleshnja, Erdi Podo, Anxhela Miraka, Gani<\/span>
\nKrrashi, Klevi Gugallja, Flavio Elezi, Ledion Mane, Eugen Lazaj, Igli Hoxhaj, Arlind Kas\u00ebmi<\/span>
\n(k\u00ebrkuesi ose nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh), i jan\u00eb drejtuar Gjykat\u00ebs me ankim kushtetues individual me t\u00eb<\/span>
\nnj\u00ebjtin objekt.<\/span>
\n7. Me vendimet e dat\u00ebs 08.11.2023 kolegjet e Gjykat\u00ebs kan\u00eb vendosur kalimin e k\u00ebtyre<\/span>
\n\u00e7\u00ebshtjeve p\u00ebr shqyrtim n\u00eb seanc\u00eb plenare publike. Po k\u00ebshtu, duke pasur parasysh natyr\u00ebn e<\/span>
\npretendimeve t\u00eb parashtruara n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb, si dhe t\u00eb drejtat kushtetuese t\u00eb p\u00ebrfshira n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje,<\/span>
\n\u00ebsht\u00eb vler\u00ebsuar marrja e mendimit me shkrim nga Komisioneri dhe UMT-ja.<\/span>
\n8. N\u00eb zbatim t\u00eb nenit 19, pika 2, t\u00eb Rregullores p\u00ebr Procedurat Gjyq\u00ebsore t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs<\/span>
\nKushtetuese, nenit 1, pika 2, t\u00eb ligjit nr. 8577\/2000 dhe nenit 57 t\u00eb Kodit t\u00eb Procedur\u00ebs Civile,<\/span>
\nMbledhja e Gjyqtar\u00ebve, me vendimin e dat\u00ebs 14.11.2023, ka vendosur bashkimin e \u00e7\u00ebshtjeve n\u00eb<\/span>
\nnj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb vetme. Me vendim t\u00eb po k\u00ebsaj date, Mbledhja e Gjyqtar\u00ebve ka vendosur edhe<\/span>
\npezullimin e zbatimit t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023, deri n\u00eb hyrjen n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb vendimit p\u00ebrfundimtar t\u00eb<\/span>
\nGjykat\u00ebs.<\/span>
\nII<\/span>
\nPretendimet n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Kushtetuese<\/span>
\n9. K\u00ebrkuesit kan\u00eb pretenduar se dispozitat ligjore t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuara cenojn\u00eb:<\/span>
\n9.1. Parimin e siguris\u00eb juridike, t\u00eb garantuar nga neni 4 i Kushtetut\u00ebs, pasi student\u00ebt q\u00eb<\/span>
\nndjekin programin e integruar t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb n\u00eb Fakultetin e Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb UMT<\/span>
\ncenohen si pasoj\u00eb e detyrimeve t\u00eb parashikuara n\u00eb dispozitat e kund\u00ebrshtuara t\u00eb ligjit<\/span>
\nnr. 60\/2023, pasi me n\u00ebnshkrimin e marr\u00ebveshjes k\u00ebrkohet kalimi zyrtarisht i<\/span>
\ndiplom\u00ebs p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse nga institucioni publik i arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb n\u00eb institucionin<\/span>
\nsh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor, ku student\u00ebt e diplomuar pun\u00ebsohen deri n\u00eb shlyerjen e detyrimeve p\u00ebr<\/span>
\npun\u00ebsim sipas afateve p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb ata q\u00eb nuk pranojn\u00eb t\u00eb lidhin<\/span>
\nmarr\u00ebveshjen, kan\u00eb detyrimin t\u00eb paguajn\u00eb vler\u00ebn e plot\u00eb t\u00eb kostos s\u00eb studimeve.<\/span>
\nStudent\u00ebt e nd\u00ebrmjet\u00ebm kan\u00eb pritshm\u00ebri p\u00ebr mosrritjen n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb eksponenciale t\u00eb<\/span>
\ntarif\u00ebs s\u00eb studimit. T\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn pritshm\u00ebri kan\u00eb edhe student\u00ebt me mesatare mbi not\u00ebn<\/span>
\n6 p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrfituar nga tarifa e p\u00ebrgjysmuar e shkollimit. Dispozitat e kund\u00ebrshtuara<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nkan\u00eb sjell\u00eb nj\u00eb p\u00ebrkeq\u00ebsim serioz t\u00eb situat\u00ebs ligjore t\u00eb student\u00ebve q\u00eb d\u00ebshirojn\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\nruajn\u00eb status quo-n\u00eb. Student\u00ebt, sidomos ata q\u00eb ndjekin vitet e nd\u00ebrmjetme, i kan\u00eb<\/span>
\nb\u00ebr\u00eb p\u00ebrllogaritjet mbi baz\u00ebn e kostos s\u00eb plot\u00eb t\u00eb studimeve, si dhe mund\u00ebsive t\u00eb tyre<\/span>
\nekonomike p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrballuar pages\u00ebn e tarif\u00ebs p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse \u00e7do vit para se t\u00eb fillonin<\/span>
\nstudimet. Ndryshimi i papritur i tarif\u00ebs, duke e pes\u00ebfishuar ose dhjet\u00ebfishuar at\u00eb,<\/span>
\ncenon edhe parimin e parashikueshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb ligjit. P\u00ebrkeq\u00ebsimi i situat\u00ebs ekonomike<\/span>
\ne juridike t\u00eb student\u00ebve q\u00eb nuk d\u00ebshirojn\u00eb t\u00eb lidhin marr\u00ebveshje nuk i sh\u00ebrben<\/span>
\ninteresit publik, pasi sigurimi i sh\u00ebrbimit sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor nuk do t\u00eb arrihet nga pagesa e<\/span>
\nvler\u00ebs s\u00eb plot\u00eb t\u00eb kostos s\u00eb studimeve p\u00ebr k\u00ebta student\u00eb, por do t\u00eb shkoj\u00eb n\u00eb z\u00ebra t\u00eb<\/span>
\nndrysh\u00ebm t\u00eb buxhetit. Po k\u00ebshtu, nuk i sh\u00ebrben interesit publik as kufizimi i<\/span>
\nt\u00ebrheqjes s\u00eb diplom\u00ebs.<\/span>
\n9.2. T\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr pun\u00eb dhe at\u00eb p\u00ebr arsimim, t\u00eb garantuara nga nenet 49 dhe 57 t\u00eb<\/span>
\nKushtetut\u00ebs, n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me kriteret e nenit 17 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, pasi:<\/span>
\n9.2.1. P\u00ebrve\u00e7 kriterit t\u00eb kufizimit me ligj nuk p\u00ebrmbushet asnj\u00eb nga kriteret e tjera<\/span>
\nkushtetuese q\u00eb lejojn\u00eb kufizimin. Ai nuk i p\u00ebrgjigjet as interesit publik, as<\/span>
\nobjektivave t\u00eb vet\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023 dhe masat e p\u00ebrdorura jan\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb ashpra se<\/span>
\nsa duhet p\u00ebr t\u00eb arritur objektivin e k\u00ebrkuar. Student\u00ebve q\u00eb refuzojn\u00eb t\u00eb lidhin<\/span>
\nmarr\u00ebveshje u cenohet e drejta p\u00ebr arsimim dhe t\u00eb drejtat e tjera t\u00eb fituara.<\/span>
\nLigjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi nuk jep asnj\u00eb arsye logjike se p\u00ebrse student\u00ebt q\u00eb duan t\u00eb ruajn\u00eb status<\/span>
\nquo-n\u00eb duhet t\u00eb paguajn\u00eb koston e plot\u00eb t\u00eb studimit, e cila p\u00ebrb\u00ebn nj\u00eb sanksion<\/span>
\nekonomik, duke rrezikuar uljen e numrit t\u00eb student\u00ebve q\u00eb ndjekin programin<\/span>
\n\u201cMjek\u00ebsi e p\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb institucionet publike t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb, n\u00eb favor t\u00eb<\/span>
\ninstitucioneve private t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb. Ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi ka rritur tarif\u00ebn e studimeve<\/span>
\nderi n\u00eb koston e plot\u00eb t\u00eb tyre pa nj\u00eb q\u00ebllim legjitim.<\/span>
\n9.2.2. Kufizimi nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrpjes\u00ebtim t\u00eb drejt\u00eb me gjendjen q\u00eb e ka diktuar, duke<\/span>
\ncenuar parimin e proporcionalitetit. Objektivi i ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsit nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb<\/span>
\nmjaftueshm\u00ebrisht i r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm p\u00ebr t\u00eb justifikuar kufizimin e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs.<\/span>
\nParashikimi i nenit 5 t\u00eb ligjit nuk i p\u00ebrgjigjet objektivit kryesor t\u00eb tij, q\u00eb ka t\u00eb<\/span>
\nb\u00ebj\u00eb me sigurimin e stafit mjek\u00ebsor n\u00eb periudh\u00eb afatgjat\u00eb. Nuk ekziston nj\u00eb<\/span>
\nsituat\u00eb emergjente dhe nuk ka ulje t\u00eb numrit t\u00eb mjek\u00ebve n\u00eb raport me popullsin\u00eb.<\/span>
\nMjetet e p\u00ebrdorura nuk jan\u00eb t\u00eb domosdoshme, q\u00eb do t\u00eb thot\u00eb se synimi mund t\u00eb<\/span>
\narrihej me mjete t\u00eb tjera dhe stimuj t\u00eb tjer\u00eb ekonomik\u00eb ose social\u00eb, pa cenuar t\u00eb<\/span>
\ndrejtat themelore t\u00eb student\u00ebve. Garantimi i sh\u00ebrbimit mjek\u00ebsor nuk ka asnj\u00eb<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nlidhje me pagimin e vler\u00ebs s\u00eb plot\u00eb t\u00eb kostos s\u00eb studimeve, ndaj nd\u00ebrhyrja nuk<\/span>
\n\u00ebsht\u00eb e p\u00ebrshtatshme p\u00ebr realizimin e q\u00ebllimit t\u00eb synuar dhe nuk e ndikon at\u00eb.<\/span>
\nSanksioni ekonomik i vendosur n\u00eb nenin 5 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023 i detyron<\/span>
\nstudent\u00ebt n\u00eb gjendje t\u00eb v\u00ebshtir\u00eb ekonomike q\u00eb t\u00eb pranojn\u00eb t\u00eb lidhin marr\u00ebveshjen<\/span>
\nose nd\u00ebshkon student\u00ebt q\u00eb nuk pranojn\u00eb ta n\u00ebnshkruajn\u00eb at\u00eb, duke rritur n\u00eb<\/span>
\nm\u00ebnyr\u00eb eksponenciale tarif\u00ebn e studimit. Masat nuk jan\u00eb t\u00eb lidhura n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\narsyeshme me objektivin, jan\u00eb arbitrare, t\u00eb padrejta dhe t\u00eb bazuara mbi vler\u00ebsime<\/span>
\nalogjike.<\/span>
\n9.2.3. Edhe masa e mbajtjes s\u00eb diplom\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u00eb mund\u00ebsuar zbatimin e ligjit \u00ebsht\u00eb e<\/span>
\npajustifikueshme, pasi shteti i ka t\u00eb gjitha mjetet ligjore p\u00ebr t\u00eb garantuar zbatimin<\/span>
\ne marr\u00ebveshjes s\u00eb n\u00ebnshkruar me student\u00ebt. E drejta e \u00e7do studenti p\u00ebr t\u00eb<\/span>
\np\u00ebrfituar diplom\u00ebn pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb studimeve \u00ebsht\u00eb e drejt\u00eb themelore q\u00eb nuk<\/span>
\nmund dhe nuk duhet t\u00eb lidhet me suksesin e zbatimit t\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjes, e cila<\/span>
\np\u00ebrb\u00ebn barr\u00eb t\u00eb ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsit dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb e patransferueshme te individi.<\/span>
\n9.3. Parimin e barazis\u00eb p\u00ebrpara ligjit dhe mosdiskriminimit, t\u00eb garantuar nga neni 18 i<\/span>
\nKushtetut\u00ebs, pasi duke rritur n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb eksponenciale tarif\u00ebn e studimit p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nstudent\u00ebt q\u00eb zgjedhin t\u00eb mos n\u00ebnshkruajn\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjen, neni 5 i ligjit nr. 60\/2023<\/span>
\ndiskriminon indirekt student\u00ebt q\u00eb nuk jan\u00eb n\u00eb gjendje ekonomike t\u00eb paguajn\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb<\/span>
\nvler\u00eb, duke i v\u00ebn\u00eb para dy mund\u00ebsive q\u00eb bien ndesh me vullnetin e tyre, pra t\u00eb<\/span>
\nlidhin marr\u00ebveshje ose t\u00eb nd\u00ebrpresin studimet. Ky nen do t\u00eb jap\u00eb pasoja t\u00eb<\/span>
\npapranueshme p\u00ebr sa i p\u00ebrket garancis\u00eb s\u00eb nenit 18 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs p\u00ebr mbrojtjen nga<\/span>
\ndiskriminimi p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb gjendjes ekonomike, pasi student\u00ebt n\u00eb gjendje t\u00eb v\u00ebshtir\u00eb<\/span>
\nekonomike do t\u00eb jen\u00eb t\u00eb detyruar t\u00eb lidhin marr\u00ebveshje p\u00ebr t\u00eb pranuar (de facto)<\/span>
\npun\u00eb t\u00eb detyruar, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb koleg\u00ebt e tyre do t\u00eb mund t\u00eb \u201cshp\u00ebtojn\u00eb\u201d duke paguar<\/span>
\ntarif\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb lart\u00eb shkollimi. Ligji parashikon diskriminimin pozitiv p\u00ebr student\u00ebt q\u00eb<\/span>
\npranojn\u00eb t\u00eb lidhin marr\u00ebveshje sipas nenit 4 t\u00eb tij, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb e kund\u00ebrta ndodh p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nata q\u00eb nuk pranojn\u00eb n\u00ebnshkrimin e saj. Ai diskriminon edhe student\u00ebt q\u00eb p\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb<\/span>
\naktualisht ulje t\u00eb tarif\u00ebs s\u00eb studimeve p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb notave t\u00eb larta, sikurse student\u00ebt<\/span>
\nq\u00eb ndjekin studimet n\u00eb institucionet e arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb publik, n\u00eb raport me ata n\u00eb<\/span>
\ninstitucionet e arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb jopublik, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt nuk p\u00ebrfshihen n\u00eb fush\u00ebn e zbatimit<\/span>
\nt\u00eb k\u00ebtij ligji.<\/span>
\n9.4. T\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb mos iu n\u00ebnshtruar pun\u00ebs s\u00eb detyruar, t\u00eb garantuar nga nenet 26 dhe<\/span>
\n49 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs dhe neni 4, pika 2, i KEDNJ-s\u00eb, pasi v\u00ebnia para zgjedhjes p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nn\u00ebnshkrimin e marr\u00ebveshjes, sipas nenit 4 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023, e student\u00ebve q\u00eb<\/span>
\nd\u00ebshirojn\u00eb t\u00eb ruajn\u00eb status quo-n\u00eb dhe nuk jan\u00eb ofruar vullnetarisht p\u00ebr n\u00ebnshkrimin<\/span>
\ne saj, ose n\u00eb t\u00eb kund\u00ebrt duhet t\u00eb p\u00ebrballen me vler\u00ebn e plot\u00eb t\u00eb kostos s\u00eb studimeve<\/span>
\nsipas nenit 5 t\u00eb tij, p\u00ebrb\u00ebn k\u00ebrc\u00ebnim p\u00ebr d\u00ebnim t\u00eb \u00e7do lloji p\u00ebr ta. Ky \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb rast<\/span>
\npar exellence ku kjo kategori student\u00ebsh detyrohet me an\u00eb t\u00eb mjeteve ekonomike<\/span>
\np\u00ebr t\u00eb kryer pun\u00eb t\u00eb detyruar kund\u00ebr vullnetit. Edhe p\u00ebr student\u00ebt q\u00eb n\u00ebnshkruajn\u00eb<\/span>
\nmarr\u00ebveshje barra \u00ebsht\u00eb e shp\u00ebrpjes\u00ebtuar, pasi ata kan\u00eb detyrimin p\u00ebr t\u00eb punuar 2<\/span>
\nderi n\u00eb 5 vjet, n\u00eb var\u00ebsi t\u00eb vitit akademik q\u00eb ndjekin n\u00eb momentin e n\u00ebnshkrimit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nsaj.<\/span>
\n10. Subjekti i interesuar, Kuvendi, ka prap\u00ebsuar si vijon:<\/span>
\n10.1. Pretendimi p\u00ebr cenimin e parimit t\u00eb siguris\u00eb juridike \u00ebsht\u00eb i pabazuar. Ligji nr.<\/span>
\n60\/2023 respekton vullnetin e lir\u00eb t\u00eb \u00e7do kandidati ose studenti p\u00ebr t\u00eb vendosur n\u00ebse<\/span>
\ndo t\u00eb p\u00ebrfitoj\u00eb nga t\u00eb drejtat e p\u00ebrcaktuara n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb ligj me n\u00ebnshkrimin e<\/span>
\nmarr\u00ebveshjes apo do t\u00eb p\u00ebrballoj\u00eb tarif\u00ebn e studimeve deri n\u00eb nivelin e kostos s\u00eb<\/span>
\ntyre. E drejta e fituar nga student\u00ebt e nd\u00ebrmjet\u00ebm q\u00eb ndjekin programin e integruar<\/span>
\nt\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb nuk cenohet, pasi tarifat e reja u referohen viteve t\u00eb ardhshme<\/span>
\nakademike dhe nuk kan\u00eb efekte prapavepruese. Kjo kategori student\u00ebsh do t\u00eb<\/span>
\np\u00ebrfshihet si pjes\u00eb e zbatimit t\u00eb ligjit p\u00ebr plot\u00ebsimin e nevojave p\u00ebr mjek\u00eb, me<\/span>
\nq\u00ebllim mbulimin me sh\u00ebrbim sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor sa m\u00eb cil\u00ebsor p\u00ebr qytetar\u00ebt. Dispozitat e<\/span>
\nkund\u00ebrshtuara nuk parashikojn\u00eb ndryshim t\u00eb rregullave gjat\u00eb procesit akademik, por<\/span>
\nndryshimet jan\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb ardhmen, duke mos cenuar t\u00eb drejtat e fituara me nisjen e<\/span>
\nvitit akademik p\u00ebr secil\u00ebn kategori.<\/span>
\n10.2. Pretendimi p\u00ebr cenimin e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr pun\u00eb dhe at\u00eb p\u00ebr arsimim, t\u00eb garantuara nga<\/span>
\nnenet 49 dhe 57 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me kriteret e nenit 17 t\u00eb<\/span>
\nKushtetut\u00ebs, \u00ebsht\u00eb i pabazuar, pasi:<\/span>
\n10.2.1. Parashikimet e nenit 55, pika 1 dhe nenit 59, pika 1, shkronja \u201cc\u201d, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs<\/span>
\njan\u00eb t\u00eb lidhura me nj\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme dhe themelore t\u00eb parashikuar n\u00eb<\/span>
\nnenin 21 t\u00eb saj, q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb e drejta e jet\u00ebs. Kujdesi sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor i lidhur me k\u00ebt\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\ndrejt\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb risi e sjell\u00eb nga Kushtetuta aktuale, por ka rr\u00ebnj\u00eb t\u00eb thella n\u00eb<\/span>
\ntradit\u00ebn ton\u00eb juridike, duke filluar me vendimin nr. 103, dat\u00eb 15.04.1938 t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMbledhjes s\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithshme t\u00eb K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Shtetit, e duke vijuar me statutin e vitit<\/span>
\n1946 dhe Kushtetut\u00ebn e vitit 1976. Ligji plot\u00ebson kriteret e nenit 17 t\u00eb<\/span>
\nKushtetut\u00ebs, pasi e drejta p\u00ebr kujdes sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor synon mbrojtjen e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\njet\u00ebs, p\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb shteti ka interes publik q\u00eb t\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyj\u00eb n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb aspekt, pasi<\/span>
\nekziston nj\u00eb nevoj\u00eb mjaft e lart\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb garantuar plot\u00ebsimin e sh\u00ebrbimeve t\u00eb<\/span>
\nsh\u00ebndetit publik me burime njer\u00ebzore. Q\u00ebllimi i ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsit gjat\u00eb hartimit dhe<\/span>
\nmiratimit t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023 ka qen\u00eb sigurimi i nj\u00eb raporti t\u00eb drejt\u00eb midis<\/span>
\nkufizimit t\u00eb vendosur dhe interesit publik.<\/span>
\n10.2.2. P\u00ebr sa i p\u00ebrket kriterit t\u00eb proporcionalitetit, interesi publik n\u00eb garantimin e<\/span>
\nsh\u00ebrbimit mjek\u00ebsor p\u00ebr popullsin\u00eb mbizot\u00ebron ndaj pritshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb student\u00ebve,<\/span>
\nq\u00eb jan\u00eb n\u00eb ndjekje e sip\u00ebr t\u00eb programit t\u00eb studimit n\u00eb mjek\u00ebsi, p\u00ebr t\u00eb vijuar edhe<\/span>
\nkoh\u00ebn e mbetur t\u00eb studimit me t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin trajtim dhe kushte q\u00eb kan\u00eb pasur deri m\u00eb<\/span>
\ntani. Kjo pritshm\u00ebri nuk mund t\u00eb ket\u00eb prioritet ndaj interesit t\u00eb p\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nsigurimin e sh\u00ebrbimit sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsi.<\/span>
\n10.2.3. Dispozitat e kund\u00ebrshtuara ndjekin nj\u00eb q\u00ebllim t\u00eb ligjsh\u00ebm. K\u00ebrkuesit nuk i<\/span>
\nreferohen ndonj\u00eb dispozite konkrete t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs p\u00ebr cenimin e thelbit t\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\ndrejtave dhe lirive apo p\u00ebrcaktimeve t\u00eb KEDNJ-s\u00eb ose p\u00ebr tejkalim t\u00eb kufizimeve<\/span>
\nt\u00eb parashikuara nga kjo e fundit. Asnj\u00ebr\u00ebs prej kategorive t\u00eb student\u00ebve nuk i<\/span>
\nmohohet e drejta p\u00ebr arsimim, p\u00ebrkundrazi ata ftohen p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrfituar nga trajtimi<\/span>
\ni ve\u00e7ant\u00eb q\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebn edhe vet\u00eb q\u00ebllimin e ligjit. Alternativat q\u00eb paraqet ligji kan\u00eb<\/span>
\nt\u00eb b\u00ebjn\u00eb me t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e studentit p\u00ebr t\u00eb zgjedhur n\u00ebse d\u00ebshiron t\u00eb p\u00ebrfitoj\u00eb<\/span>
\nleht\u00ebsit\u00eb q\u00eb krijohen me n\u00ebnshkrimin e marr\u00ebveshjes p\u00ebr t\u00eb punuar n\u00eb profesionin<\/span>
\ne mjekut pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb studimeve n\u00eb institucionet sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore n\u00eb vend.<\/span>
\nDispozitat e ligjit jan\u00eb hartuar n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me nevojat e diktuara n\u00eb vend. Shteti<\/span>
\ngaranton arsimin e student\u00ebve n\u00eb fush\u00ebn e mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb sipas parashikimeve ligjore,<\/span>
\nduke mbuluar edhe nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb t\u00eb kostove p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse. Ligji garanton pun\u00ebsimin e<\/span>
\nmjek\u00ebve t\u00eb diplomuar dhe nuk ka cenim n\u00eb thelbin e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr pun\u00eb dhe as<\/span>
\ntejkalim t\u00eb kufizimeve t\u00eb parashikuara n\u00eb KEDNJ.<\/span>
\n10.3. Pretendimi p\u00ebr cenimin e parimit t\u00eb barazis\u00eb p\u00ebrpara ligjit dhe mosdiskriminimit<\/span>
\n\u00ebsht\u00eb i pabazuar, pasi p\u00ebrmes dispozitave t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuara ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi ka ofruar<\/span>
\nmund\u00ebsi t\u00eb ndryshme zgjedhjeje p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjith\u00eb student\u00ebt e arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb n\u00eb mjek\u00ebsi.<\/span>
\nN\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me sa pretendojn\u00eb k\u00ebrkuesit, secili nga student\u00ebt \u00ebsht\u00eb i lir\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\nzgjedh\u00eb lirisht at\u00eb mund\u00ebsi q\u00eb i p\u00ebrshtatet m\u00eb mir\u00eb, sipas preferencave t\u00eb tij. Ofrimi<\/span>
\ni alternativave p\u00ebr t\u00eb zgjedhur dhe zgjedhja q\u00eb do t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb \u00e7do student nuk p\u00ebrb\u00ebn<\/span>
\ndiskriminim.<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\n10.4. Pretendimi p\u00ebr cenimin e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u00eb mos iu n\u00ebnshtruar pun\u00ebs s\u00eb detyruar<\/span>
\n\u00ebsht\u00eb i pabazuar, pasi nuk b\u00ebhet fjal\u00eb p\u00ebr \u201cpun\u00eb t\u00eb detyruar\u201d, n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 26<\/span>
\nt\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs dhe nenit 4, pika 2, t\u00eb KEDNJ-s\u00eb. Dispozitat e kund\u00ebrshtuara<\/span>
\ngarantojn\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e \u00e7do individi p\u00ebr t\u00eb zgjedhur lirisht profesionin q\u00eb d\u00ebshiron,<\/span>
\nn\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me parashikimet e legjislacionit n\u00eb fuqi. Parashikimet e neneve 4 dhe<\/span>
\n5 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023 p\u00ebrb\u00ebjn\u00eb kufizim t\u00eb p\u00ebrligjur, i cili u p\u00ebrgjigjet nevojave dhe<\/span>
\ninteresit t\u00eb lart\u00eb publik p\u00ebr garantimin e ofrimit t\u00eb sh\u00ebrbimit sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor, si nj\u00eb nga<\/span>
\nt\u00eb drejtat themelore t\u00eb njeriut t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuara n\u00eb nenet 55 dhe 59 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs.<\/span>
\n\u201cPun\u00ebsim\u201d konsiderohet edhe periudha e specializimit afatgjat\u00eb, pavar\u00ebsisht llojit<\/span>
\nt\u00eb kuot\u00ebs s\u00eb fituar, ku nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb e student\u00ebve, p\u00ebrve\u00e7se kryejn\u00eb specializimin n\u00eb<\/span>
\nstrukturat sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse, duke kontribuar n\u00eb zhvillimin e tyre profesional,<\/span>
\np\u00ebrmbushin edhe detyrimin si periudh\u00eb pun\u00ebsimi n\u00eb Shqip\u00ebri.<\/span>
\n11. Subjekti i interesuar, K\u00ebshilli i Ministrave, ka prap\u00ebsuar si vijon:<\/span>
\nA) P\u00ebr legjitimimin<\/span>
\n11.1. Grupi i student\u00ebve t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb UMT nuk legjitimohet, pasi nuk ka<\/span>
\nshteruar mjetet juridike efektive n\u00eb dispozicion, n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 131, pika 1,<\/span>
\nshkronja \u201cf\u201d, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs dhe ligjit nr. 8577\/2000. Ky k\u00ebrkues duhet t\u2019i ngrej\u00eb<\/span>
\npretendimet n\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha shkall\u00ebt e juridiksionit t\u00eb zakonsh\u00ebm, duke iu dh\u00ebn\u00eb<\/span>
\nmund\u00ebsi gjykatave t\u00eb zakonshme q\u00eb t\u00eb vler\u00ebsojn\u00eb n\u00ebse dispozitat e kund\u00ebrshtuara<\/span>
\nparaqesin probleme kushtetutshm\u00ebrie, duke referuar m\u00eb pas \u00e7\u00ebshtjen n\u00eb Gjykat\u00eb<\/span>
\np\u00ebrmes gjykimit incidental.<\/span>
\nB) P\u00ebr themelin e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs<\/span>
\n11.2. Pretendimi p\u00ebr cenimin e parimit t\u00eb siguris\u00eb juridike nuk gjen mb\u00ebshtetje n\u00eb<\/span>
\nparashikimet kushtetuese. Ai \u00ebsht\u00eb i paqart\u00eb, pasi mungon parashtrimi i<\/span>
\nargumenteve p\u00ebr sa i p\u00ebrket p\u00ebrkeq\u00ebsimit serioz t\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr arsimim dhe pun\u00eb<\/span>
\nprej ligjit objekt shqyrtimi, q\u00eb ka sjell\u00eb pasoja q\u00eb bien ndesh me vet\u00eb q\u00ebllimin e<\/span>
\nligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsit, e deformojn\u00eb at\u00eb ose q\u00eb d\u00ebmtojn\u00eb efektivitetin e tyre. Pandemia<\/span>
\nbot\u00ebrore COVID-19 ka gjeneruar efekte negative, ndaj politikat p\u00ebr rim\u00ebk\u00ebmbje<\/span>
\nduhet t\u00eb rimodelohen. Ligji nr. 60\/2023 \u00ebsht\u00eb hartuar n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me strategjit\u00eb<\/span>
\nkryesore n\u00eb vend, e konkretisht me q\u00ebllimet e politikave n\u00eb fushat e arsimit,<\/span>
\nsh\u00ebndet\u00ebsis\u00eb dhe pun\u00ebsimit sipas Strategjis\u00eb Komb\u00ebtare p\u00ebr Zhvillim dhe Integrim<\/span>
\n2022-2023, Strategjis\u00eb Komb\u00ebtare t\u00eb Arsimit 2021-2026, Strategjis\u00eb Komb\u00ebtare t\u00eb<\/span>
\nSh\u00ebndet\u00ebsis\u00eb 2021-2030, t\u00eb miratuara me VKM. Tarifa e studimeve, e cila ka qen\u00eb<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nrreth 45,000 lek\u00eb\/vit, me llogaritjen sipas metodologjis\u00eb s\u00eb re b\u00ebhet rreth 240,000<\/span>
\nlek\u00eb\/vit, vler\u00eb q\u00eb i p\u00ebrgjigjet kostos s\u00eb nj\u00eb studenti t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb<\/span>
\nbuxhetin e shtetit. Ligji \u00ebsht\u00eb mb\u00ebshtet\u00ebs p\u00ebr student\u00ebt e Fakultetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb,<\/span>
\npasi me n\u00ebnshkrimin e marr\u00ebveshjes ata mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb nga e drejta p\u00ebr t\u00eb mos<\/span>
\npaguar detyrimet financiare q\u00eb lidhen me pagimin e tarif\u00ebs s\u00eb studimeve p\u00ebrgjat\u00eb<\/span>
\nviteve q\u00eb do t\u00eb ndjekin programin e studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e<\/span>
\np\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d, si edhe leht\u00ebsi t\u00eb tjera. Parashikimet ligjore t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuara<\/span>
\nrespektojn\u00eb vullnetin e lir\u00eb t\u00eb studentit p\u00ebr t\u00eb vendosur vet\u00eb n\u00ebse do t\u00eb p\u00ebrfitoj\u00eb nga<\/span>
\nt\u00eb drejtat e p\u00ebrcaktuara n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb ligj me n\u00ebnshkrimin e marr\u00ebveshjes ose n\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\nkund\u00ebrt t\u00eb p\u00ebrballoj\u00eb tarif\u00ebn e studimeve deri n\u00eb nivelin e kostos s\u00eb tyre. Interesi<\/span>
\npublik n\u00eb garantimin e sh\u00ebrbimit mjek\u00ebsor p\u00ebr popullsin\u00eb mbizot\u00ebron ndaj<\/span>
\npritshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb k\u00ebrkuesve. Kjo pritshm\u00ebri nuk mund t\u00eb ket\u00eb prioritet ndaj interesit<\/span>
\nt\u00eb p\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr sigurimin e jet\u00ebs dhe sh\u00ebrbimit sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsi.<\/span>
\n11.3. Pretendimi p\u00ebr cenimin e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr pun\u00eb dhe at\u00eb p\u00ebr arsimim, t\u00eb garantuara<\/span>
\nnga nenet 49 dhe 57 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me kriteret e nenit 17 t\u00eb<\/span>
\nKushtetut\u00ebs, \u00ebsht\u00eb i pabazuar, pasi:<\/span>
\n11.3.1. Ligji nr. 60\/2023 ndihmon n\u00eb mbajtjen e talentit vendas n\u00eb sistemin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor<\/span>
\nshqiptar, duke parandaluar largimin e tij jasht\u00eb shtetit. E drejta p\u00ebr arsimim nuk<\/span>
\n\u00ebsht\u00eb mohuar, por \u00ebsht\u00eb e nd\u00ebrthurur me detyrime specifike t\u00eb p\u00ebrkohshme p\u00ebr t\u00eb<\/span>
\nmb\u00ebshtetur nevojat n\u00eb sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsi. Dispozitat e kund\u00ebrshtuara nuk cenojn\u00eb thelbin<\/span>
\ne s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr arsimim, pasi \u00e7do subjekt i tyre ka t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e zgjedhjes n\u00ebse<\/span>
\nd\u00ebshiron t\u00eb p\u00ebrfitoj\u00eb nga leht\u00ebsit\u00eb q\u00eb krijohen me n\u00ebnshkrimin e marr\u00ebveshjes apo<\/span>
\nn\u00eb t\u00eb kund\u00ebrt t\u2019u p\u00ebrgjigjet detyrimeve q\u00eb lindin p\u00ebr pages\u00ebn e tarifave t\u00eb studimit.<\/span>
\nP\u00ebrmes k\u00ebtyre dispozitave synohet pun\u00ebsim sa m\u00eb i shpejt\u00eb i student\u00ebve t\u00eb<\/span>
\nmjek\u00ebsis\u00eb, duke detyruar institucionet pun\u00ebdh\u00ebn\u00ebse p\u00ebr respektimin e k\u00ebtij<\/span>
\nparashikimi ligjor, i cili n\u00eb rast mosrespektimi brenda nj\u00eb viti nga momenti i<\/span>
\nlindjes s\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim p\u00ebr student\u00ebt konsiderohet i p\u00ebrmbushur.<\/span>
\n11.3.2. Nuk ka cenim t\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb fituar edhe nga student\u00ebt e nd\u00ebrmjet\u00ebm, sepse tarifat<\/span>
\nn\u00eb rast mosn\u00ebnshkrimi t\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjes u referohen viteve t\u00eb ardhshme akademike<\/span>
\ndhe nuk kan\u00eb efekte prapavepruese. N\u00eb thelb, dispozitat ligjore kund\u00ebrshtohen p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nshkak t\u00eb vendosjes s\u00eb nj\u00eb sanksioni t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00eb monetar, q\u00eb lidhet me aktet n\u00ebnligjore<\/span>
\nq\u00eb kan\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuar vler\u00ebn e kostos s\u00eb studimeve, t\u00eb cilat mund t\u00eb b\u00ebhen objekt<\/span>
\nshqyrtimi n\u00eb gjykatat e juridiksionit t\u00eb zakonsh\u00ebm dhe jo n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb Gjykat\u00eb. Ligji<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nnr. 60\/2023 ka efekt t\u00eb p\u00ebrkohsh\u00ebm, pasi i shtrin efektet e tij p\u00ebr periudh\u00ebn nga<\/span>
\nviti akademik 2023-2024 deri n\u00eb vitin akademik 2027-2028. Nga shteti jan\u00eb marr\u00eb<\/span>
\nedhe masa t\u00eb tjera n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb kujdesit sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor, por pavar\u00ebsisht politikave t\u00eb<\/span>
\nzbatuara ka nevoj\u00eb imediate p\u00ebr t\u00eb adresuar n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb shteruese fenomenin e<\/span>
\nlargimit t\u00eb mjek\u00ebve nga sistemi dhe nga vendi.<\/span>
\n11.3.3. Jan\u00eb respektuar kriteret e kufizimeve t\u00eb parashikuara n\u00eb nenin 17 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs,<\/span>
\npasi nd\u00ebrhyrja \u00ebsht\u00eb kryer p\u00ebrmes nj\u00eb ligji t\u00eb miratuar nga Kuvendi, p\u00ebr interes<\/span>
\npublik, duke vendosur edhe detyrimet p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse. Dispozitat e kund\u00ebrshtuara<\/span>
\nsynojn\u00eb nj\u00eb balancim midis interesave t\u00eb student\u00ebve dhe atyre t\u00eb sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsis\u00eb<\/span>
\npublike. Interesi publik n\u00eb garantimin e sh\u00ebrbimit mjek\u00ebsor p\u00ebr popullsin\u00eb<\/span>
\nmbizot\u00ebron ndaj pritshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb k\u00ebrkuesve, e cila nuk mund t\u00eb ket\u00eb prioritet.<\/span>
\n11.4. Pretendimi p\u00ebr cenimin e parimit t\u00eb barazis\u00eb para ligjit dhe mosdiskriminimit \u00ebsht\u00eb<\/span>
\ni pabazuar, pasi ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi ka synuar mbrojtjen e interesit m\u00eb t\u00eb lart\u00eb publik p\u00ebr t\u00eb<\/span>
\ngarantuar plot\u00ebsimin e nevojave p\u00ebr burimeve njer\u00ebzore n\u00eb institucionet<\/span>
\nsh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore. Ligji \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb harmoni me parashikimin e nenit 6 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 10221,<\/span>
\ndat\u00eb 04.02.2010 \u201cP\u00ebr mbrojtjen nga diskriminimi\u201d, t\u00eb ndryshuar (ligji nr.<\/span>
\n10221\/2010) dhe n\u00eb rastin konkret legjitimohet trajtimi ndryshe i p\u00ebrligjur.<\/span>
\nDispozitat e kund\u00ebrshtuara nuk jan\u00eb diskriminuese, pasi profesioni i mjekut \u00ebsht\u00eb i<\/span>
\ndomosdosh\u00ebm p\u00ebr interesin publik, q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb sh\u00ebndeti i popullat\u00ebs. Ato p\u00ebrcaktojn\u00eb<\/span>
\nn\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb transparente kriteret q\u00eb duhen t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbushen p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrfituar nga trajtimi<\/span>
\ni ve\u00e7ant\u00eb dhe ky p\u00ebrcaktim \u00ebsht\u00eb detyrim i p\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm, q\u00eb nuk bazohet n\u00eb kritere<\/span>
\nekonomike, por n\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsin\u00eb ndaj sistemit sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor dhe arsimit mjek\u00ebsor n\u00eb<\/span>
\nvend. Parashikimet ligjore nuk synojn\u00eb t\u00eb diskriminojn\u00eb ata student\u00eb q\u00eb nuk jan\u00eb n\u00eb<\/span>
\ngjendje ekonomike p\u00ebr t\u00eb paguar, por p\u00ebrcaktojn\u00eb nj\u00eb detyrim q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb i lidhur me<\/span>
\nt\u00eb ardhurat akademike dhe profesionale pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb studimeve. Dispozitat e<\/span>
\nkund\u00ebrshtuara nuk sjellin trajtim t\u00eb diferencuar, por parashikojn\u00eb kritere objektive<\/span>
\nq\u00eb aplikohen nj\u00eblloj p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjith\u00eb student\u00ebt, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt kan\u00eb ende lirin\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb zgjedhur<\/span>
\ninstitucionin e tyre t\u00eb studimit, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb ata q\u00eb nuk d\u00ebshirojn\u00eb t\u00eb pranojn\u00eb<\/span>
\ntrajtim t\u00eb ve\u00e7ant\u00eb, nuk jan\u00eb t\u00eb detyruar t\u00eb studiojn\u00eb n\u00eb institucione publike. Po<\/span>
\nk\u00ebshtu, ligji nr. 60\/2023 nuk parashikon diskriminim ndaj student\u00ebve t\u00eb<\/span>
\ninstitucioneve jopublike, pasi ai vepron brenda nj\u00eb fushe kompetence t\u00eb caktuar dhe<\/span>
\nn\u00eb kontekstin e nevojave specifike t\u00eb arsimit publik. Ai mbron dhe krijon kushtet<\/span>
\np\u00ebr t\u00eb realizuar interesin m\u00eb t\u00eb lart\u00eb publik, duke vepruar me mjetet dhe<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nmekanizmat e duhur ligjor\u00eb, n\u00eb p\u00ebrpjes\u00ebtim me gjendjen q\u00eb e ka diktuar. Ka edhe<\/span>
\nligje apo akte n\u00ebnligjore t\u00eb tjera me natyr\u00eb t\u00eb till\u00eb, ashtu si edhe n\u00eb shtete t\u00eb tjera<\/span>
\ngjejm\u00eb parashikime t\u00eb ngjashme n\u00eb legjislacionet e brendshme.<\/span>
\n11.5. I pabazuar \u00ebsht\u00eb edhe pretendimi p\u00ebr cenimin e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u00eb mos iu n\u00ebnshtruar<\/span>
\npun\u00ebs s\u00eb detyruar, pasi dispozitat e kund\u00ebrshtuara nuk p\u00ebrmbushin asnj\u00eb nga<\/span>
\nkushtet e vendosura nga Gjykata Evropiane p\u00ebr t\u00eb Drejtat e Njeriut (GJEDNJ) p\u00ebr t\u00eb<\/span>
\nkualifikuar si pun\u00eb t\u00eb detyruar pun\u00ebsimin e student\u00ebve q\u00eb pranojn\u00eb t\u00eb n\u00ebnshkruajn\u00eb<\/span>
\nmarr\u00ebveshjen e parashikuar n\u00eb nenin 4 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023. K\u00ebto parashikime nuk<\/span>
\njan\u00eb nuk jan\u00eb t\u00eb padrejta, pasi nuk lidhen as me ndonj\u00eb nd\u00ebshkim, as me ndonj\u00eb<\/span>
\nkarakteristik\u00eb personale t\u00eb student\u00ebve. Ato nuk p\u00ebrb\u00ebjn\u00eb detyrim shtyp\u00ebs dhe nuk<\/span>
\nkrijojn\u00eb asnj\u00eb raport t\u00eb padrejt\u00eb me aft\u00ebsit\u00eb dhe mund\u00ebsit\u00eb e student\u00ebve. Plot\u00ebsimi i<\/span>
\nkushteve ligjore nuk ka karakter nd\u00ebshkimor, por sjell mb\u00ebshtetje financiare p\u00ebr ata<\/span>
\nq\u00eb regjistrohen ose ndjekin programin e integruar t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb n\u00eb mjek\u00ebsi, duke<\/span>
\nmos r\u00ebnduar pozit\u00ebn e tyre ekonomike. Ligji \u00ebsht\u00eb i orientuar drejt mb\u00ebshtetjes s\u00eb<\/span>
\ninteresave publik\u00eb n\u00eb sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsi, duke siguruar nj\u00eb num\u00ebr t\u00eb mjaftuesh\u00ebm t\u00eb<\/span>
\nmjek\u00ebve t\u00eb trajnuar p\u00ebr sh\u00ebrbimin e qytetar\u00ebve. Dispozitat ligjore u japin student\u00ebve<\/span>
\nlirin\u00eb p\u00ebr zgjedhjen e kushteve p\u00ebr trajtimin e ve\u00e7ant\u00eb dhe detyrimin e pun\u00ebsimit<\/span>
\npas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb studimeve n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb respekton lirin\u00eb dhe vullnetin e<\/span>
\nindividit.<\/span>
\nIII<\/span>
\nProcesi n\u00eb gjykimin kushtetues<\/span>
\nA. P\u00ebr vijimin e mas\u00ebs s\u00eb pezullimit<\/span>
\n12. K\u00ebrkuesit kan\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar edhe pezullimin e zbatimit t\u00eb dispozitave t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuara t\u00eb<\/span>
\nligjit nr. 60\/2023 deri n\u00eb dh\u00ebnien e vendimit p\u00ebrfundimtar nga Gjykata, duke pretenduar se<\/span>
\nrreziku q\u00eb student\u00ebt t\u00eb kryejn\u00eb nj\u00eb zgjedhje t\u00eb detyruar p\u00ebr shkaqe q\u00eb lidhen me gjendjen<\/span>
\nekonomike dhe kund\u00ebr vullnetit t\u00eb tyre \u00ebsht\u00eb real dhe pasojat negative q\u00eb rrjedhin n\u00ebse ligji<\/span>
\nzbatohet jan\u00eb serioze dhe t\u00eb pakthyeshme p\u00ebr student\u00ebt q\u00eb d\u00ebshirojn\u00eb t\u00eb ruajn\u00eb status quo-n\u00eb.<\/span>
\n13. Me vendimin e dat\u00ebs 14.11.2023, Mbledhja e Gjyqtar\u00ebve, pasi mori n\u00eb shqyrtim<\/span>
\nk\u00ebrkes\u00ebn, n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me parashikimet e nenit 45 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 8577\/2000, ka vendosur pranimin e<\/span>
\nsaj, duke pezulluar zbatimin e dispozitave t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuara t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023 deri n\u00eb hyrjen n\u00eb<\/span>
\nfuqi t\u00eb vendimit p\u00ebrfundimtar t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs.<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\n14. Subjekti i interesuar, K\u00ebshilli i Ministrave, n\u00eb prap\u00ebsimet e dat\u00ebs 11.12.2023 drejtuar<\/span>
\nGjykat\u00ebs, ka k\u00ebrkuar heqjen e mas\u00ebs s\u00eb pezullimit, pasi nuk justifikohen k\u00ebrkesat e nenit 45 t\u00eb<\/span>
\nligjit nr. 8577\/2000 dhe k\u00ebrkuesit nuk kan\u00eb paraqitur argumente konkrete dhe reale n\u00eb lidhje me<\/span>
\npasojat aktuale q\u00eb do t\u00eb duhej t\u00eb parandaloheshin dhe rrezikun p\u00ebr pasoja t\u00eb mundshme q\u00eb vijn\u00eb<\/span>
\nnga zbatimi i dispozitave t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuara t\u00eb tilla q\u00eb prekin interesat e tyre, \u00e7ka p\u00ebrb\u00ebn kriterin<\/span>
\nthelb\u00ebsor p\u00ebr pezullimin e zbatimit t\u00eb aktit t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuar.<\/span>
\n15. Subjekti i interesuar, Kuvendi, n\u00eb seanc\u00ebn plenare publike t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 21.12.2023 ka<\/span>
\nparaqitur k\u00ebrkes\u00eb paraprake p\u00ebr heqjen e mas\u00ebs s\u00eb pezullimit, pasi ajo nuk justifikon k\u00ebrkesat e<\/span>
\nnenit 45 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 8577\/2000. Sipas tij, k\u00ebrkuesit nuk kan\u00eb paraqitur argumente konkrete dhe<\/span>
\nreale n\u00eb lidhje me menj\u00ebhershm\u00ebrin\u00eb dhe pasojat aktuale q\u00eb do t\u00eb duhej t\u00eb parandaloheshin apo<\/span>
\nrrezikun p\u00ebr pasoja t\u00eb mundshme q\u00eb vijn\u00eb nga zbatimi i dispozitave t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuara t\u00eb ligjit nr.<\/span>
\n60\/2023. Po sipas Kuvendit, Gjykata duhet t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsoj\u00eb nevoj\u00ebn p\u00ebr pezullim, pasi kjo mund t\u00eb<\/span>
\nsjell\u00eb pasiguri juridike n\u00eb sektorin e sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsis\u00eb dhe t\u00eb arsimit mjek\u00ebsor, si dhe efekte negative<\/span>
\nn\u00eb planifikimin dhe funksionimin e sistemit mjek\u00ebsor.<\/span>
\n16. Neni 45, pika 1, i ligjit nr. 8577\/2000 parashikon se Gjykata, kryesisht ose me<\/span>
\nk\u00ebrkes\u00eb t\u00eb pal\u00ebs, kur vler\u00ebson se zbatimi i ligjit ose i aktit mund t\u00eb sjell\u00eb pasoja q\u00eb prekin interesa<\/span>
\nshtet\u00ebror\u00eb, shoq\u00ebror\u00eb ose t\u00eb individ\u00ebve, sipas rastit, me vendim t\u00eb Mbledhjes s\u00eb Gjyqtar\u00ebve ose<\/span>
\nn\u00eb seanc\u00eb plenare urdh\u00ebron pezullimin e ligjit ose t\u00eb aktit. Pezullimi vazhdon derisa vendimi<\/span>
\np\u00ebrfundimtar i Gjykat\u00ebs t\u00eb hyj\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi. N\u00eb kushtet kur pezullimi \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb mas\u00eb e<\/span>
\njasht\u00ebzakonshme, Gjykata v\u00ebren se vendosja e tij lidhet me vler\u00ebsimin e pasojave ose efekteve t\u00eb<\/span>
\nzbatimit t\u00eb aktit. K\u00ebto pasoja jo vet\u00ebm duhet t\u00eb jen\u00eb reale, pra n\u00eb realizim e sip\u00ebr, por edhe t\u00eb<\/span>
\nr\u00ebnda, n\u00eb at\u00eb mas\u00eb q\u00eb shkojn\u00eb tej mas\u00ebs normale t\u00eb kufizimit, n\u00eb ve\u00e7anti n\u00eb pik\u00ebpamje t\u00eb<\/span>
\nurgjenc\u00ebs.<\/span>
\n17. Bazuar n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb dispozit\u00eb, pasi d\u00ebgjoi pal\u00ebt n\u00eb proces dhe mori n\u00eb shqyrtim<\/span>
\npretendimet e tyre p\u00ebr vijimin e mas\u00ebs s\u00eb pezullimit, Gjykata, duke pasur parasysh pasojat q\u00eb<\/span>
\nmund t\u00eb vijn\u00eb p\u00ebr student\u00ebt q\u00eb ndjekin programin e integruar t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb n\u00eb Fakultetin e<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb UMT nga zbatimi i dispozitave t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuara, \u00e7moi se ato jan\u00eb aktuale dhe reale<\/span>
\ndhe n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 45 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 8577\/2000 p\u00ebrligjin vijimin e mas\u00ebs s\u00eb pezullimit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nvendosur me vendimin e dat\u00ebs 14.11.2023 t\u00eb Mbledhjes s\u00eb Gjyqtar\u00ebve.<\/span>
\nIV<\/span>
\nVler\u00ebsimi i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nB. P\u00ebr legjitimimin e k\u00ebrkuesve<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nB.1. P\u00ebr legjitimimin ratione personae<\/span>
\nB.1.1. P\u00ebr legjitimimin e nj\u00eb grupi deputet\u00ebsh<\/span>
\n18. \u00c7\u00ebshtjen e legjitimimit (locus standi) Gjykata e ka vler\u00ebsuar si nj\u00eb nd\u00ebr aspektet<\/span>
\nkryesore q\u00eb lidhet me v\u00ebnien n\u00eb l\u00ebvizje t\u00eb nj\u00eb procesi kushtetues. Kushtetuta, n\u00eb nenin 134, pika<\/span>
\n1, t\u00eb saj, ka p\u00ebrcaktuar n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb shteruese rrethin e subjekteve kushtetuese q\u00eb legjitimohen t\u00eb<\/span>
\nv\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb l\u00ebvizje juridiksionin kushtetues.<\/span>
\n19. Jo m\u00eb pak se nj\u00eb e pesta e deputet\u00ebve t\u00eb Kuvendit \u00ebsht\u00eb subjekt i parashikuar n\u00eb nenin<\/span>
\n134, pika 1, shkronja \u201cc\u201d, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs dhe nenin 49, pika 1, t\u00eb ligjit nr. 8577\/2000, t\u00eb cilat i<\/span>
\nnjohin atij t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr nisjen e kontrollit abstrakt t\u00eb kushtetutshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb ligjit, n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb<\/span>
\nnenit 131, pika 1, shkronja \u201ca\u201d, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs. Gjykata ka theksuar se interesi publik i k\u00ebtyre<\/span>
\nfunksionar\u00ebve publik\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb i prezumuar, pasi nj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb e tyre v\u00eb n\u00eb l\u00ebvizje nj\u00eb kontroll<\/span>
\nabstrakt e objektiv t\u00eb aktit normativ dhe interesi q\u00eb k\u00ebrkohet t\u00eb mbrohet lidhet me respektimin e<\/span>
\nparimeve kushtetuese dhe me funksionimin e rregullt t\u00eb shtetit t\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs. Mbrojtja e sistemit<\/span>
\nnormativ dhe parimeve shtetformuese, nd\u00ebr t\u00eb tjera, si konstitucionalizmi, shteti i s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs,<\/span>
\ndemokracia, dinjiteti njer\u00ebzor, barazia sociale, t\u00eb shpalosura n\u00eb Kushtetut\u00eb, nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e<\/span>
\nkusht\u00ebzuar nga nj\u00eb interes subjektiv konkret. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb kuptim, Gjykata pohon se q\u00ebllimi i<\/span>
\nkontrollit t\u00eb kushtetutshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb ligjeve \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00ebkoh\u00ebsisht edhe parandalimi i pasojave negative<\/span>
\nq\u00eb mund t\u00eb vijn\u00eb nga zbatimi i tyre (shih vendimet nr. 35, dat\u00eb 15.06.2023; nr. 18, dat\u00eb<\/span>
\n07.07.2022; nr. 55, dat\u00eb 27.07.2016 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese).<\/span>
\n20. N\u00eb k\u00ebndv\u00ebshtrim t\u00eb sa m\u00eb sip\u00ebr, Gjykata v\u00ebren se k\u00ebrkuesi, nj\u00eb grup prej 30<\/span>
\ndeputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit, n\u00eb cil\u00ebsin\u00eb e subjektit kushtetues jo m\u00eb pak se nj\u00eb e pesta e deputet\u00ebve,<\/span>
\nsi subjekt i pakusht\u00ebzuar nuk ka nevoj\u00eb t\u00eb provoj\u00eb interesin e tij t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb p\u00ebr v\u00ebnien n\u00eb<\/span>
\nl\u00ebvizje t\u00eb kontrollit abstrakt t\u00eb pajtueshm\u00ebris\u00eb me Kushtetut\u00ebn t\u00eb dispozitave t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023,<\/span>
\nobjekt i k\u00ebsaj k\u00ebrkese, p\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb ai legjitimohet ratione personae.<\/span>
\nB.1.2. P\u00ebr legjitimimin e grupit t\u00eb student\u00ebve<\/span>
\n21. Grupi i student\u00ebve t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb, n\u00eb UMT ka parashtruar se legjitimohet<\/span>
\nratione personae, pasi \u00ebsht\u00eb bart\u00ebs i t\u00eb drejtave kushtetuese dhe ka interes t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nkund\u00ebrshtimin e dispozitave objekt t\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs, pasi k\u00ebto t\u00eb fundit cenojn\u00eb n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb reale t\u00eb<\/span>
\ndrejtat e tyre dhe garancit\u00eb e mbrojtura nga Kushtetuta. N\u00eb lidhje me legjitimimin ratione<\/span>
\npersonae subjektet e interesuara nuk kan\u00eb paraqitur asnj\u00eb argument.<\/span>
\n22. Sipas neneve 131, pika 1, shkronja \u201cf\u201d dhe 134, pikat 1, shkronja \u201ci\u201d dhe 2, t\u00eb<\/span>
\nKushtetut\u00ebs, si dhe nenit 71 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 8577\/2000, \u00e7do individ, person fizik ose juridik, subjekt i<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\ns\u00eb drejt\u00ebs private dhe publike, mund t\u00eb v\u00ebr\u00eb n\u00eb l\u00ebvizje Gjykat\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykimin p\u00ebrfundimtar t\u00eb<\/span>
\nankesave kund\u00ebr \u00e7do akti t\u00eb pushtetit publik ose vendimi gjyq\u00ebsor q\u00eb cenon t\u00eb drejtat dhe lirit\u00eb<\/span>
\nthemelore t\u00eb garantuara n\u00eb Kushtetut\u00eb. Ankimi kushtetues individual, n\u00eb \u00e7do rast, duhet t\u00eb<\/span>
\nplot\u00ebsoj\u00eb kriteret e nenit 71\/a t\u00eb ligjit nr. 8577\/2000, q\u00eb lidhen me shterimin e mjeteve juridike<\/span>
\nefektive, afatin e paraqitjes s\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs, pasojat negative t\u00eb p\u00ebsuara n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb e<\/span>
\nreale, si dhe mund\u00ebsin\u00eb p\u00ebr rivendosjen e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb shkelur. N\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen n\u00eb shqyrtim k\u00ebrkesa<\/span>
\ndrejtuar Gjykat\u00ebs \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00ebnshkruar individualisht nga 37 k\u00ebrkues q\u00eb jan\u00eb student\u00eb t\u00eb programit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nintegruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e p\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb UMT, sipas v\u00ebrtetimeve<\/span>
\np\u00ebrkat\u00ebse t\u00eb l\u00ebshuara nga dekani i Fakultetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb UMT bashk\u00eblidhur k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs.<\/span>
\n23. Po sipas Gjykat\u00ebs, bazuar n\u00eb nenet 49, pika 3, shkronja \u201ce\u201d dhe 71, pika 2, t\u00eb ligjit nr.<\/span>
\n8577\/2000, objekt i ankimit kushtetues individual mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb edhe ligji ose akti normativ. N\u00eb<\/span>
\nk\u00ebto raste, k\u00ebrkuesi legjitimohet n\u00ebse plot\u00ebsohen bashk\u00ebrisht k\u00ebto kritere: (i) legjitimimi ratione<\/span>
\npersonae, n\u00eb kuptimin q\u00eb individi provon se \u00ebsht\u00eb bart\u00ebs i s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs kushtetuese t\u00eb pretenduar t\u00eb<\/span>
\ncenuar, si dhe provon interesin n\u00eb lidhje me \u00e7\u00ebshtjen, pra cenimin e drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb dhe real t\u00eb s\u00eb<\/span>
\ndrejt\u00ebs kushtetuese; (ii) shterimi i mjeteve juridike efektive p\u00ebr mbrojtjen e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs kushtetuese<\/span>
\nt\u00eb pretenduar t\u00eb cenuar ose individi provon se akti i kund\u00ebrshtuar \u00ebsht\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt i<\/span>
\nzbatuesh\u00ebm; (iii) legjitimimi ratione temporis, n\u00eb kuptimin q\u00eb individi ka paraqitur ankim brenda<\/span>
\nafatit ligjor 4-mujor nga konstatimi i cenimit; (iv) legjitimimi ratione materiae, n\u00eb kuptimin q\u00eb<\/span>
\nindividi provon se pretendimet e ngritura jan\u00eb t\u00eb tilla q\u00eb b\u00ebjn\u00eb pjes\u00eb n\u00eb juridiksionin kushtetues,<\/span>
\npra t\u00eb drejtat dhe lirit\u00eb themelore, q\u00eb pretendohen se jan\u00eb cenuar, jan\u00eb t\u00eb garantuara n\u00eb<\/span>
\nKushtetut\u00eb, si dhe shqyrtimi kushtetues i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes mund t\u00eb rivendos\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn kushtetuese t\u00eb<\/span>
\nshkelur (shih vendimet nr. 38, dat\u00eb 12.07.2023; nr. 4, dat\u00eb 21.02.2022; nr. 31, dat\u00eb 04.10.2021<\/span>
\nt\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese).<\/span>
\n24. N\u00eb rastin konkret, Gjykata, bazuar n\u00eb aktet bashk\u00eblidhur k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs, v\u00ebren se student\u00ebt<\/span>
\ne Fakultetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb UMT nuk jan\u00eb t\u00eb organizuar n\u00eb form\u00ebn e nj\u00eb organizate n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb<\/span>
\nnenit 134, pika 1, shkronja \u201ch\u201d, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, por ata i jan\u00eb drejtuar Gjykat\u00ebs si nj\u00eb grupim<\/span>
\nindivid\u00ebsh. P\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, p\u00ebr q\u00ebllime t\u00eb legjitimimit t\u00eb k\u00ebtij k\u00ebrkuesi n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb neneve 131,<\/span>
\npika 1, shkronja \u201cf\u201d dhe 134, pika 1, shkronja \u201ci\u201d, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, n\u00eb rastin e pretendimeve p\u00ebr<\/span>
\npapajtueshm\u00ebri t\u00eb ligjit me Kushtetut\u00ebn, grupi i student\u00ebve duhet t\u00eb provoj\u00eb se \u00ebsht\u00eb viktim\u00eb e<\/span>
\nshkeljes dhe se zbatimi i dispozitave t\u00eb ligjit t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuar cenon interesat e tij, duke sjell\u00eb<\/span>
\npasoja t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejta dhe reale.<\/span>
\n25. Sipas GJEDNJ-s\u00eb, k\u00ebrkuesit mund t\u00eb pretendojn\u00eb se jan\u00eb viktima t\u00eb nj\u00eb shkeljeje n\u00ebse<\/span>
\njan\u00eb an\u00ebtar\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00eb grupi n\u00eb rrezik ose q\u00eb preken drejtp\u00ebrdrejt nga legjislacioni. K\u00ebrkuesi mund t\u00eb<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\npretendoj\u00eb se nj\u00eb ligj shkel t\u00eb drejtat e tij\/saj dhe p\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb \u201cviktim\u00eb\u201d, sipas kuptimit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nnenit 34, n\u00ebse atij i k\u00ebrkohet t\u00eb modifikoj\u00eb sjelljen e tij ose rrezikon t\u00eb procedohet p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nmosrespektim t\u00eb ligjit (shih Burden kund\u00ebr Mbret\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb Bashkuar (DhM), nr. 13378\/05, \u00a7 34,<\/span>
\nECHR 2008; S.A.S. kund\u00ebr Franc\u00ebs (DhM), nr.43835\/11, dat\u00eb 01.07.2014, \u00a7 57).<\/span>
\n26. Gjykata konstaton se dispozitat e kund\u00ebrshtuara t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023 p\u00ebrcaktojn\u00eb<\/span>
\nkriteret p\u00ebr p\u00ebrfitimin e trajtimit t\u00eb ve\u00e7ant\u00eb n\u00ebse student\u00ebt e Fakultetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb UMT<\/span>
\npranojn\u00eb n\u00ebnshkrimin e marr\u00ebveshjes me pasoj\u00eb kalimin zyrtarisht t\u00eb diplom\u00ebs p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse t\u00eb<\/span>
\narsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb nga institucioni publik i arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb, ku studenti ka p\u00ebrfunduar studimet, n\u00eb<\/span>
\ninstitucionin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor ku pun\u00ebsohet deri n\u00eb \u201cshlyerjen e detyrimeve p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim\u201d sipas afatit<\/span>
\nt\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuar. Student\u00ebt e Fakultetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt i jan\u00eb drejtuar Gjykat\u00ebs me ankim<\/span>
\nkushtetues, jan\u00eb subjekte t\u00eb t\u00eb drejtave kushtetuese t\u00eb pretenduara t\u00eb cenuara p\u00ebr sa koh\u00eb q\u00eb<\/span>
\np\u00ebrfshihen n\u00eb ato kategori q\u00eb preken n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb nga dispozitat e kund\u00ebrshtuara.<\/span>
\nMe fillimin e vitit akademik ata jan\u00eb v\u00ebn\u00eb p\u00ebrball\u00eb zgjedhjes mes n\u00ebnshkrimit t\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjes<\/span>
\ndhe p\u00ebrfitimit t\u00eb trajtimit t\u00eb ve\u00e7ant\u00eb apo pages\u00ebs s\u00eb vler\u00ebs s\u00eb plot\u00eb t\u00eb kostos s\u00eb studimeve.<\/span>
\nParashikimet e dispozitave t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuara i detyrojn\u00eb student\u00ebt t\u00eb modifikojn\u00eb sjelljen n\u00eb<\/span>
\nsituat\u00ebn n\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebn ndodhen, duke u v\u00ebn\u00eb p\u00ebrball\u00eb nj\u00eb zgjedhjeje t\u00eb re, \u00e7ka ndikon n\u00eb interesat e<\/span>
\ntyre, ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht p\u00ebr ata student\u00eb q\u00eb nuk kan\u00eb mund\u00ebsi ekonomike, duke u detyruar t\u00eb pranojn\u00eb<\/span>
\nkushtet e vendosura p\u00ebr kalimin e diplom\u00ebs deri n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin e afatit t\u00eb detyruar p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim.<\/span>
\nP\u00ebr sa m\u00eb sip\u00ebr, Gjykata vler\u00ebson se p\u00ebr sa koh\u00eb q\u00eb k\u00ebto parashikime ligjore zbatohen n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb<\/span>
\nt\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb dhe reale mbi ta, ata mund t\u00eb pretendojn\u00eb se jan\u00eb viktima t\u00eb shkeljes, p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nrrjedhoj\u00eb grupi i student\u00ebve legjitimohet ratione personae, n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb neneve 131, pika 1,<\/span>
\nshkronja \u201cf\u201d dhe 134, pikat 1, shkronja \u201ci\u201d dhe 2, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, pasi provon interesin e<\/span>
\ndrejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb n\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen e parashtruar.<\/span>
\n27. P\u00ebr sa i p\u00ebrket kriterit t\u00eb shterimit t\u00eb mjeteve juridike efektive, n\u00eb jurisprudenc\u00ebn e saj<\/span>
\nGjykata ka theksuar se n\u00eb rastet e pretendimeve p\u00ebr papajtueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e ligjeve me Kushtetut\u00ebn,<\/span>
\nk\u00ebrkuesi duhet t`i ket\u00eb p\u00ebrdorur t\u00eb gjitha mjetet juridike n\u00eb dispozicion p\u00ebr mbrojtjen e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs<\/span>
\nkushtetuese q\u00eb cenon ligji i kund\u00ebrshtuar jo vet\u00ebm formalisht, por edhe n\u00eb kuptimin substancial.<\/span>
\nSi rregull, ligji zbatohet p\u00ebrmes akteve t\u00eb organeve publike ose vendimeve gjyq\u00ebsore, prandaj<\/span>
\nindividi duhet, s\u00eb pari, t\u2019i kund\u00ebrshtoj\u00eb ato para gjykatave kompetente, duke shteruar t\u00eb gjitha<\/span>
\nmjetet juridike q\u00eb parashikon sistemi yn\u00eb juridik. Kjo ka r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi edhe p\u00ebr t\u00eb provuar se k\u00ebrkuesi<\/span>
\n\u00ebsht\u00eb prekur personalisht, drejtp\u00ebrdrejt dhe realisht. Megjithat\u00eb, ligji ka parashikuar edhe rastet<\/span>
\nkur p\u00ebrmbushja e k\u00ebtij kriteri \u00ebsht\u00eb e pamundur (legjislacioni nuk parashikon mjete juridike ose<\/span>
\nato jan\u00eb joefektive). Meqen\u00ebse mjeti juridik mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb i ndrysh\u00ebm, n\u00eb var\u00ebsi t\u00eb llojit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nankimit, efektiviteti i tij vler\u00ebsohet jo thjesht nga fakti q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb parashikuar me ligj, por edhe nga<\/span>
\nzbatueshm\u00ebria e tij. Karakteristika e zbatimit t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb t\u00eb ligjit lidhet me aft\u00ebsin\u00eb q\u00eb ka<\/span>
\nligji i kund\u00ebrshtuar p\u00ebr t\u00eb cenuar n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb po t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn themelore individuale<\/span>
\ndhe, p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, b\u00ebhet fjal\u00eb p\u00ebr ato raste kur ligji nuk parashikon nxjerrjen e akteve n\u00ebnligjore<\/span>
\nt\u00eb nevojshme p\u00ebr zbatimin e tij. Kjo n\u00ebnkupton se ligji i shkakton pasojat e tij ndaj t\u00eb drejtave<\/span>
\nkushtetuese individuale pa pasur nevoj\u00ebn e detajimit t\u00eb rregullave shtes\u00eb n\u00eb form\u00ebn e akteve<\/span>
\nn\u00ebnligjore (shih vendimet nr. 4, dat\u00eb 21.02.2022; nr. 31, dat\u00eb 04.10.2021 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs<\/span>
\nKushtetuese).<\/span>
\n28. K\u00ebrkuesi, grupi i student\u00ebve, ka pretenduar se \u00e7do lloj kund\u00ebrshtimi gjyq\u00ebsisht i<\/span>
\ndispozitave t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023 do t\u00eb rezultonte joefektiv, pasi edhe n\u00ebse do t\u00eb investonte<\/span>
\ngjykatat e juridiksionit t\u00eb zakonsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar pezullimin e ligjit nr. 60\/2023 dhe d\u00ebrgimin<\/span>
\ne tij p\u00ebr gjykim incidental n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Kushtetuese, kjo do t\u00eb rezultonte n\u00eb humbje kohe,<\/span>
\nshp\u00ebrdorim t\u00eb resurseve gjyq\u00ebsore, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb pranimi i k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs p\u00ebr kontroll incidental nuk do<\/span>
\nt\u00eb ishte i sigurt. Po k\u00ebshtu, gjykimi n\u00eb t\u00eb tria shkall\u00ebt e gjyq\u00ebsorit t\u00eb zakonsh\u00ebm, qoft\u00eb edhe me<\/span>
\nprocedur\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrshpejtuar, do t\u00eb ishte objektivisht i pamundur t\u00eb p\u00ebrfundonte brenda k\u00ebtij viti<\/span>
\nakademik, \u00e7ka do t\u00eb sillte pasoja te student\u00ebt e vitit t\u00eb fundit t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb UMT.<\/span>
\nNga ana tjet\u00ebr, gjykatat e juridiksionit t\u00eb zakonsh\u00ebm nuk mund t\u00eb pezullojn\u00eb ligje dhe akte<\/span>
\nnormative, pasi nj\u00eb prerogativ\u00eb e till\u00eb i p\u00ebrket vet\u00ebm Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese.<\/span>
\n29. Subjekti i interesuar, K\u00ebshilli i Ministrave, ka prap\u00ebsuar se grupi i student\u00ebve t\u00eb<\/span>
\nFakultetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb UMT nuk legjitimohet, pasi nuk ka shteruar mjetet juridike efektive n\u00eb<\/span>
\ndispozicion, n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 131, pika 1, shkronja \u201cf\u201d, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs dhe ligjit nr. 8577\/2000.<\/span>
\nAi duhet t\u2019i ngrej\u00eb pretendimet n\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha shkall\u00ebt e juridiksionit t\u00eb zakonsh\u00ebm, duke iu dh\u00ebn\u00eb<\/span>
\nmund\u00ebsi gjykatave t\u00eb zakonshme q\u00eb t\u00eb vler\u00ebsojn\u00eb n\u00ebse dispozitat e kund\u00ebrshtuara paraqesin<\/span>
\nprobleme kushtetutshm\u00ebrie, duke referuar m\u00eb pas \u00e7\u00ebshtjen n\u00eb Gjykat\u00eb p\u00ebrmes gjykimit<\/span>
\nincidental.<\/span>
\n30. Gjykata vler\u00ebson t\u00eb theksoj\u00eb, s\u00eb pari, se paraqitja e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs p\u00ebr nisjen e kontrollit<\/span>
\nincidental t\u00eb norm\u00ebs nuk p\u00ebrb\u00ebn element t\u00eb domosdosh\u00ebm n\u00eb k\u00ebndv\u00ebshtrim t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbushjes s\u00eb<\/span>
\nkriterit t\u00eb shterimit t\u00eb mjeteve juridike efektive, megjithat\u00eb, si nj\u00eb form\u00eb jo e drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb e<\/span>
\naksesit n\u00eb gjykimin kushtetues, pal\u00ebt n\u00eb procesin gjyq\u00ebsor, n\u00ebse kan\u00eb v\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb l\u00ebvizje nj\u00eb t\u00eb till\u00eb,<\/span>
\nmund t\u00eb zgjedhin t\u2019i k\u00ebrkojn\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb zakonshme q\u00eb t\u00eb investoj\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Kushtetuese (shih<\/span>
\nvendimin nr. 4, dat\u00eb 21.02.2022 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese).<\/span>
\n31. N\u00eb k\u00ebndv\u00ebshtrim t\u00eb sa m\u00eb sip\u00ebr, Gjykata v\u00ebren se dispozitat ligjore t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuara<\/span>
\nt\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023 nuk parashikojn\u00eb nxjerrjen e akteve n\u00ebnligjore t\u00eb nevojshme p\u00ebr zbatimin e<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\ntyre, por ato jan\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt t\u00eb zbatueshme ndaj k\u00ebrkuesit, si student\u00eb t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb<\/span>
\nn\u00eb UMT, q\u00eb prej momentit q\u00eb fillon viti akademik, ku ata vihen p\u00ebrball\u00eb zgjedhjes p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nn\u00ebnshkrimin e marr\u00ebveshjes, n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb trajtim t\u00eb ve\u00e7ant\u00eb, ose t\u00eb pages\u00ebs s\u00eb<\/span>
\nvler\u00ebs s\u00eb plot\u00eb t\u00eb kostos s\u00eb studimeve. K\u00ebto dispozita jan\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt t\u00eb zbatueshme nga<\/span>
\nk\u00ebrkuesi, grupi i student\u00ebve, duke sjell\u00eb pasojat e kund\u00ebrshtuara kushtetutshm\u00ebrisht. N\u00eb k\u00ebto<\/span>
\nkushte, n\u00eb lidhje me dispozitat ligjore objekt t\u00eb k\u00ebtij gjykimi, k\u00ebrkuesi nuk ka mjete t\u00eb tjera n\u00eb<\/span>
\ndispozicion p\u00ebr t\u00eb shteruar p\u00ebrve\u00e7 v\u00ebnies n\u00eb l\u00ebvizje t\u00eb kontrollit t\u00eb pajtueshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb tyre me<\/span>
\nKushtetut\u00ebn, pra paraqitjes s\u00eb ankimit kushtetues individual p\u00ebr rivendosjen e t\u00eb drejtave<\/span>
\nkushtetuese t\u00eb pretenduara t\u00eb cenuara.<\/span>
\nB.2. P\u00ebr legjitimimin ratione temporis<\/span>
\nB.2.1. P\u00ebr legjitimimin ratione temporis t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuesit, nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh<\/span>
\n32. Sipas nenit 50, pika 1, t\u00eb ligjit nr. 8577\/2000, afati p\u00ebr paraqitjen e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nkontrollin e pajtueshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb ligjit ose t\u00eb akteve t\u00eb tjera normative me Kushtetut\u00ebn \u00ebsht\u00eb 2 vjet<\/span>
\nnga hyrja n\u00eb fuqi e aktit. Ligji nr. 60\/2023 \u00ebsht\u00eb botuar n\u00eb Fletoren Zyrtare nr. 123, dat\u00eb<\/span>
\n16.08.2023 dhe ka hyr\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi 15 dit\u00eb pas botimit t\u00eb tij, p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsisht n\u00eb dat\u00ebn 31.08.2023, kurse<\/span>
\nk\u00ebrkesa \u00ebsht\u00eb paraqitur n\u00eb Gjykat\u00eb dorazi n\u00eb dat\u00ebn 19.10.2023, pra brenda afatit ligjor.<\/span>
\nB.2.2. P\u00ebr legjitimimin ratione temporis t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuesit, nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh<\/span>
\n33. Sipas k\u00ebrkuesit cenimi i t\u00eb drejtave kushtetuese t\u00eb student\u00ebve \u00ebsht\u00eb materializuar n\u00eb<\/span>
\nmomentin e hyrjes n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023, pra n\u00eb dat\u00ebn 31.08.2023, ose sipas nj\u00eb<\/span>
\ninterpretimi m\u00eb t\u00eb gjer\u00eb n\u00eb v\u00ebshtrim t\u00eb nenit 4 t\u00eb ligjit, me fillimin e vitit akademik 2023-2024,<\/span>
\npra n\u00eb dat\u00ebn 02.10.2023.<\/span>
\n34. Lidhur me afatin ligjor t\u00eb paraqitjes s\u00eb ankimit kushtetues individual, bazuar n\u00eb<\/span>
\nnenin 50, pika 4, t\u00eb ligjit nr. 8577\/2000, ai duhet t\u00eb paraqitet brenda 4 muajve nga konstatimi i<\/span>
\ncenimit. Gjykata ka vler\u00ebsuar se n\u00eb rastin e k\u00ebtij lloj ankimi konstatimi i cenimit si rregull nuk<\/span>
\np\u00ebrkon me \u00e7astin e hyrjes n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb ligjit ose aktit normativ. N\u00eb k\u00ebto raste afati ligjor llogaritet<\/span>
\nnga \u00e7asti kur akti fillon t\u00eb prodhoj\u00eb efekte p\u00ebr k\u00ebrkuesin ose, th\u00ebn\u00eb ndryshe, kur ndaj tij zbatohet<\/span>
\nligji ose akti normativ (shih vendimin nr. 31, dat\u00eb 04.10.2021 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese).<\/span>
\n35. Gjykata v\u00ebren se ligji nr. 60\/2023 \u00ebsht\u00eb botuar n\u00eb Fletoren Zyrtare nr. 123, dat\u00eb<\/span>
\n16.08.2023 dhe ka hyr\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi n\u00eb dat\u00ebn 31.08.2023, pra p\u00ebrpara fillimit t\u00eb vitit akademik 2023-<\/span>
\n2024, q\u00eb sipas urdhrit t\u00eb ministrit t\u00eb Arsimit dhe Sportit \u00ebsht\u00eb data 02.10.2023, dhe pas testimit t\u00eb<\/span>
\ndetyruar t\u00eb pranimit p\u00ebr student\u00ebt e vitit t\u00eb par\u00eb, i cili, referuar akteve t\u00eb k\u00ebtij gjykimi, \u00ebsht\u00eb<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nzhvilluar n\u00eb periudh\u00ebn 14-23.08.2023. P\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, edhe pse student\u00ebt q\u00eb preken nga ky ligj<\/span>
\nkategorizohen n\u00eb dy grupime: student\u00ebt n\u00eb vitin e par\u00eb t\u00eb studimeve dhe; student\u00ebt e nd\u00ebrmjet\u00ebm,<\/span>
\nligji i kund\u00ebrshtuar ka filluar t\u00eb sjell\u00eb efekte p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjith\u00eb me fillimin e vitit akademik 2023-2024,<\/span>
\nq\u00eb p\u00ebrkon me momentin kur, si\u00e7 \u00ebsht\u00eb shprehur Gjykata n\u00eb analiz\u00ebn e legjitimimit ratione<\/span>
\npersonae, jan\u00eb v\u00ebn\u00eb p\u00ebrball\u00eb zgjedhjes mes n\u00ebnshkrimit t\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjes dhe p\u00ebrfitimit t\u00eb<\/span>
\ntrajtimit t\u00eb ve\u00e7ant\u00eb ose pages\u00ebs s\u00eb vler\u00ebs s\u00eb plot\u00eb t\u00eb kostos s\u00eb studimeve. Duke vler\u00ebsuar k\u00ebt\u00eb si<\/span>
\nmomentin nga i cili ka filluar t\u00eb ec\u00eb afati 4-mujor p\u00ebr paraqitjen e ankimit kushtetues individual,<\/span>
\nGjykata vler\u00ebson se \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrmbushur edhe kriteri i legjitimimit ratione temporis.<\/span>
\nB.3. P\u00ebr legjitimimin ratione materiae<\/span>
\n36. Gjykata v\u00ebren se k\u00ebrkuesit kan\u00eb pretenduar cenimin e disa parimeve dhe t\u00eb drejtave<\/span>
\nkushtetuese, m\u00eb konkretisht t\u00eb parimit t\u00eb siguris\u00eb juridike, t\u00eb garantuar n\u00eb nenin 4 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs,<\/span>
\ns\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr pun\u00eb dhe s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr arsimim, t\u00eb garantuara nga nenet 49 dhe 57 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs,<\/span>
\nn\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me kriteret e kufizimit t\u00eb parashikuara n\u00eb nenin 17 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nt\u00eb mos iu n\u00ebnshtruar pun\u00ebs s\u00eb detyruar, t\u00eb garantuar nga neni 26 i Kushtetut\u00ebs, si edhe parimit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nbarazis\u00eb p\u00ebrpara ligjit dhe mosdiskriminimit, t\u00eb garantuar nga neni 18 i Kushtetut\u00ebs.<\/span>
\n37. Gjykata v\u00ebren se pretendimin p\u00ebr cenimin e parimit t\u00eb barazis\u00eb p\u00ebrpara ligjit dhe t\u00eb<\/span>
\nmosdiskriminimit, t\u00eb garantuar n\u00eb nenin 18 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, k\u00ebrkuesi e ka bazuar n\u00eb dallimet, p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nshkak t\u00eb gjendjes ekonomike, q\u00eb, sipas tij, krijohen midis kategorive t\u00eb ndryshme t\u00eb student\u00ebve:<\/span>
\n(i) midis student\u00ebve q\u00eb ndjekin studimet n\u00eb Fakultetin e Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb UMT, e lidhur kjo me<\/span>
\npages\u00ebn e vler\u00ebs s\u00eb plot\u00eb t\u00eb kostos s\u00eb studimeve n\u00eb rast t\u00eb mosn\u00ebnshkrimit t\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjes s\u00eb<\/span>
\np\u00ebrcaktuar n\u00eb nenin 4 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023 me student\u00ebt q\u00eb n\u00ebnshkruajn\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjen, si edhe<\/span>
\n(ii) midis student\u00ebve q\u00eb ndjekin studimet n\u00eb Fakultetin e Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb UMT dhe student\u00ebve q\u00eb<\/span>
\nndjekin studimet n\u00eb institucionet jopublike t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb, p\u00ebr shkak se mbi k\u00ebta t\u00eb fundit nuk<\/span>
\nr\u00ebndon detyrimi p\u00ebr n\u00ebnshkrimin e marr\u00ebveshjes. Edhe pse k\u00ebrkuesi ka pretenduar se ky parim<\/span>
\ncenohet nga dispozitat ligjore objekt k\u00ebrkese, n\u00eb thelb ai e ka lidhur pretendimin me vler\u00ebn e<\/span>
\nkostos financiare t\u00eb studimeve q\u00eb duhet t\u00eb p\u00ebrballojn\u00eb student\u00ebt q\u00eb nuk pranojn\u00eb t\u00eb n\u00ebnshkruajn\u00eb<\/span>
\nmarr\u00ebveshjen me institucionet sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore publike. Gjykata v\u00ebren se metodologjia p\u00ebr<\/span>
\np\u00ebrcaktimin e kostove t\u00eb studimeve dhe vlera e saj nuk p\u00ebrcaktohen nga ligji nr. 60\/2023, por<\/span>
\njan\u00eb miratuar me akte n\u00ebnligjore t\u00eb organeve t\u00eb UMT-s\u00eb, q\u00eb kan\u00eb dal\u00eb n\u00eb zbatim t\u00eb k\u00ebtij ligji, por<\/span>
\nq\u00eb nuk jan\u00eb objekt i k\u00ebtij gjykimi kushtetues dhe p\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr mund t\u00eb jen\u00eb objekt i kontrollit t\u00eb<\/span>
\njuridiksionit t\u00eb zakonsh\u00ebm gjyq\u00ebsor. P\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, pretendimi p\u00ebr cenimin e nenit 18 t\u00eb<\/span>
\nKushtetut\u00ebs nuk mund t\u00eb merret n\u00eb shqyrtim n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb gjykim kushtetues.<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\n38. Referuar p\u00ebrmbajtjes s\u00eb pretendimeve t\u00eb tjera t\u00eb parashtruara n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb, Gjykata<\/span>
\nv\u00ebren se ato q\u00eb lidhen me t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr arsimim, sipas nenit 57 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, jan\u00eb mb\u00ebshtetur<\/span>
\nn\u00eb cenimin e t\u00eb drejtave t\u00eb fituara dhe pritshm\u00ebrive t\u00eb ligjshme t\u00eb student\u00ebve p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb<\/span>
\nndryshimit t\u00eb korniz\u00ebs ligjore q\u00eb ka qen\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi n\u00eb koh\u00ebn kur ata kan\u00eb filluar studimet n\u00eb<\/span>
\nFakultetin e Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb (ligji nr. 80\/2015 \u201cP\u00ebr arsimin e lart\u00eb dhe k\u00ebrkimin shkencor n\u00eb<\/span>
\ninstitucionet e arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb n\u00eb Republik\u00ebn e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb\u201d, i ndryshuar (ligji nr. 80\/2015)) p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nstudent\u00ebt e nd\u00ebrmjet\u00ebm, dhe kur kan\u00eb vendosur t\u00eb konkurrojn\u00eb p\u00ebr t`u b\u00ebr\u00eb pjes\u00eb e atij fakulteti,<\/span>
\np\u00ebr student\u00ebt e vitit t\u00eb par\u00eb. P\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, k\u00ebto pretendime do t\u00eb analizohen n\u00eb vijim n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb<\/span>
\nparimit t\u00eb siguris\u00eb juridike. Kurse pretendimet q\u00eb kan\u00eb t\u00eb b\u00ebjn\u00eb me cenimin e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u00eb<\/span>
\nfituar mjetet e jetes\u00ebs me pun\u00eb t\u00eb ligjshme t\u00eb zgjedhur ose t\u00eb pranuar vet\u00eb dhe asaj p\u00ebr t\u00eb mos iu<\/span>
\nn\u00ebnshtruar pun\u00ebs s\u00eb detyruar, p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00ebs se si jan\u00eb parashtruar ato, do t\u00eb shqyrtohen n\u00eb<\/span>
\nvijim n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbajtjes s\u00eb nenit 49, pika 1, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs.<\/span>
\nC. P\u00ebr themelin e pretendimeve<\/span>
\nC.1. P\u00ebr cenimin e parimit t\u00eb siguris\u00eb juridike<\/span>
\n39. Sipas k\u00ebrkuesve, student\u00ebt q\u00eb ndjekin programin e integruar t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb n\u00eb<\/span>
\nFakultetin e Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb UMT cenohen si pasoj\u00eb e detyrimeve t\u00eb parashikuara n\u00eb dispozitat e<\/span>
\nkund\u00ebrshtuara t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023, pasi me n\u00ebnshkrimin e marr\u00ebveshjes k\u00ebrkohet kalimi<\/span>
\nzyrtarisht i diplom\u00ebs p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse nga institucioni publik i arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb n\u00eb institucionin<\/span>
\nsh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor ku student\u00ebt e diplomuar pun\u00ebsohen deri n\u00eb shlyerjen e detyrimeve p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim<\/span>
\nsipas afateve p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse. Ata student\u00eb q\u00eb nuk pranojn\u00eb t\u00eb lidhin marr\u00ebveshjen kan\u00eb detyrimin t\u00eb<\/span>
\npaguajn\u00eb koston e plot\u00eb t\u00eb studimeve. Sipas k\u00ebrkuesve, dispozitat e kund\u00ebrshtuara kan\u00eb sjell\u00eb nj\u00eb<\/span>
\np\u00ebrkeq\u00ebsim serioz t\u00eb situat\u00ebs ligjore t\u00eb student\u00ebve q\u00eb d\u00ebshirojn\u00eb t\u00eb ruajn\u00eb status quo-n\u00eb, sidomos<\/span>
\nt\u00eb atyre q\u00eb ndjekin vitet e nd\u00ebrmjetme, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt i kan\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb p\u00ebrllogaritjet mbi baz\u00ebn e kostos s\u00eb<\/span>
\nplot\u00eb t\u00eb studimeve, si dhe mund\u00ebsive t\u00eb tyre ekonomike p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrballuar pages\u00ebn e tarif\u00ebs<\/span>
\np\u00ebrkat\u00ebse \u00e7do vit, para se t\u00eb fillonin studimet. Sipas tyre, p\u00ebrkeq\u00ebsimi i situat\u00ebs ekonomike e<\/span>
\njuridike t\u00eb student\u00ebve q\u00eb nuk d\u00ebshirojn\u00eb t\u00eb lidhin marr\u00ebveshje nuk i sh\u00ebrben interesit publik dhe<\/span>
\nas kufizimi i t\u00ebrheqjes s\u00eb diplom\u00ebs.<\/span>
\n40. Subjekti i interesuar, Kuvendi, ka prap\u00ebsuar se q\u00ebllimi i ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsit ka qen\u00eb sigurimi<\/span>
\ni nj\u00eb raporti t\u00eb drejt\u00eb midis kufizimit t\u00eb vendosur dhe interesit publik dhe alternativat e ligjit kan\u00eb<\/span>
\nt\u00eb b\u00ebjn\u00eb me t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e vet\u00eb studentit p\u00ebr t\u00eb zgjedhur n\u00ebse d\u00ebshiron t\u00eb p\u00ebrfitoj\u00eb leht\u00ebsit\u00eb q\u00eb<\/span>
\nkrijohen me n\u00ebnshkrimin e marr\u00ebveshjes. Sipas tij, duke qen\u00eb kjo nj\u00eb mas\u00eb proporcionale, vet\u00eb e<\/span>
\ndrejta p\u00ebr arsimim dhe pun\u00eb nuk cenohet, pasi shteti garanton arsimin e student\u00ebve n\u00eb fush\u00ebn e<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nmjek\u00ebsis\u00eb sipas parashikimeve ligjore, duke mbuluar edhe nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb t\u00eb kostove p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse. N\u00eb<\/span>
\nvler\u00ebsimin e k\u00ebtij subjekti e drejta e fituar nga student\u00ebt e nd\u00ebrmjet\u00ebm, q\u00eb ndjekin programin e<\/span>
\nintegruar t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb n\u00eb Fakultetin e Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb UMT nuk cenohet, pasi ndryshimet ligjore<\/span>
\nzbatohen p\u00ebr t\u00eb ardhmen, duke mos cenuar t\u00eb drejtat e fituara me nisjen e vitit akademik p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nsecil\u00ebn kategori q\u00eb preket prej tyre.<\/span>
\n41. Subjekti i interesuar, K\u00ebshilli i Ministrave, ka prap\u00ebsuar se \u00e7do student ka t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e<\/span>
\nzgjedhjes n\u00ebse d\u00ebshiron t\u00eb p\u00ebrfitoj\u00eb nga leht\u00ebsit\u00eb q\u00eb krijohen me n\u00ebnshkrimin e marr\u00ebveshjes apo<\/span>
\nn\u00eb t\u00eb kund\u00ebrt t\u2019u p\u00ebrgjigjet detyrimeve q\u00eb lindin p\u00ebr pages\u00ebn e tarifave t\u00eb studimit. Sipas tij, nuk<\/span>
\nka cenim t\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb fituar nga student\u00ebt e nd\u00ebrmjet\u00ebm q\u00eb ndjekin studimet n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb program<\/span>
\nstudimi, pasi parashikimet ligjore nuk kan\u00eb efekte prapavepruese, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb ato synojn\u00eb<\/span>
\npun\u00ebsimin sa m\u00eb t\u00eb shpejt\u00eb t\u00eb student\u00ebve t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb. Sipas k\u00ebtij subjekti, n\u00eb rast t\u00eb<\/span>
\nmosrespektimit t\u00eb k\u00ebtij detyrimi brenda nj\u00eb viti nga momenti i lindjes s\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim,<\/span>
\nai konsiderohet i p\u00ebrmbushur dhe studentit t\u00eb diplomuar, edhe pse nuk pajiset me diplom\u00ebn dhe<\/span>
\nsuplementin e saj, me p\u00ebrfundimin e procedurave i lind e drejta p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim n\u00eb sistemin<\/span>
\nsh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor shqiptar.<\/span>
\n42. Sipas nenit 57, pika 1, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs kushdo ka t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr arsimim, kurse sipas<\/span>
\npik\u00ebs 4 t\u00eb tij arsimi i lart\u00eb mund t\u00eb kusht\u00ebzohet vet\u00ebm nga kritere aft\u00ebsie. Edhe sipas nenit 2, pika<\/span>
\n1, t\u00eb Protokollit Shtes\u00eb t\u00eb KEDNJ-s\u00eb, askujt nuk mund t\u2019i mohohet e drejta p\u00ebr arsimim (neni 2,<\/span>
\npika 1). N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim, GJEDNJ-ja ka theksuar se kjo e drejt\u00eb, p\u00ebr vet\u00eb natyr\u00ebn e saj, k\u00ebrkon<\/span>
\nrregullim nga shteti, rregullim i cili mund t\u00eb ndryshoj\u00eb n\u00eb koh\u00eb dhe vend, n\u00eb var\u00ebsi t\u00eb nevojave t\u00eb<\/span>
\nkomunitetit dhe t\u00eb individ\u00ebve. \u00cbsht\u00eb e vet\u00ebkuptueshme se nj\u00eb rregullim i till\u00eb nuk duhet t\u00eb cenoj\u00eb<\/span>
\nkurr\u00eb thelbin e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr arsimim dhe as t\u00eb bjer\u00eb ndesh me t\u00eb drejtat e tjera t\u00eb parashikuara n\u00eb<\/span>
\nKonvent\u00eb (shih \u201cN\u00eb lidhje me disa aspekte t\u00eb ligjeve p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin e gjuh\u00ebve n\u00eb arsim n\u00eb<\/span>
\nBelgjik\u00eb\u201d kund\u00ebr Belgjik\u00ebs nr. 1474\/62; 1677\/62; 1691\/62; 1769\/63; 1994\/63; 2126\/64, dat\u00eb<\/span>
\n23.07.1968, \u00a7 5 (pjesa \u201cLigji\u201d); Leyla \u015eahin kund\u00ebr Turqis\u00eb (DhM), dat\u00eb 10.11.2005, \u00a7 154).<\/span>
\n43. P\u00ebr sa m\u00eb sip\u00ebr, Gjykata vler\u00ebson se e drejta p\u00ebr arsimim \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb e drejt\u00eb q\u00eb<\/span>
\norientohet nga shteti drejt krijimit, zhvillimit, p\u00ebrcjelljes dhe mbrojtjes s\u00eb dijeve p\u00ebrmes<\/span>
\nm\u00ebsimdh\u00ebnies dhe k\u00ebrkimit shkencor, duke kontribuar n\u00eb rritjen e standardeve t\u00eb demokracis\u00eb n\u00eb<\/span>
\nvend, si dhe zhvillimin ekonomik, social dhe kulturor etj. Kufijt\u00eb ligjor\u00eb t\u00eb rregullimit t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj t\u00eb<\/span>
\ndrejte mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktohen, rast pas rasti, edhe n\u00eb var\u00ebsi t\u00eb nevojave dhe interesave t\u00eb<\/span>
\np\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm publik\u00eb, por duke ruajtur balanc\u00ebn q\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrja n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u00eb jet\u00eb n\u00eb at\u00eb mas\u00eb<\/span>
\nsa q\u00eb t\u00eb mos ul\u00eb n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb ndjeshme dhe thelb\u00ebsore ushtrimin e saj.<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\n44. P\u00ebr sa i p\u00ebrket parimit t\u00eb siguris\u00eb juridike, Gjykata ka theksuar se ky parim ashtu si<\/span>
\nedhe mbrojtja e t\u00eb drejtave t\u00eb fituara, si dhe e pritshm\u00ebrive t\u00eb ligjshme p\u00ebrb\u00ebjn\u00eb elemente t\u00eb<\/span>
\nparimit t\u00eb shtetit t\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs, t\u00eb sanksionuar n\u00eb nenin 4 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs. Parimi i siguris\u00eb juridike,<\/span>
\np\u00ebrfshin, krahas qart\u00ebsis\u00eb, kuptueshm\u00ebris\u00eb dhe q\u00ebndrueshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb sistemit normativ edhe<\/span>
\nbesueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e qytetar\u00ebve te shteti dhe pandryshueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e ligjit p\u00ebr marr\u00ebdh\u00ebniet e<\/span>
\nrregulluara. Besueshm\u00ebria ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me bindjen e individit se nuk duhet t\u00eb shqet\u00ebsohet<\/span>
\nvazhdimisht ose t\u00eb jetoj\u00eb me frik\u00eb p\u00ebr ndryshueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb dhe pasojat negative t\u00eb akteve juridike,<\/span>
\nt\u00eb cilat mund t\u00eb cenojn\u00eb jet\u00ebn e tij private ose profesionale dhe t\u00eb p\u00ebrkeq\u00ebsojn\u00eb nj\u00eb gjendje t\u00eb<\/span>
\nvendosur me akte t\u00eb m\u00ebparshme (shih vendimet nr. 1, dat\u00eb 16.01.2017; nr. 15, dat\u00eb 10.03.2016;<\/span>
\nnr. 25, dat\u00eb 28.04.2014 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese). Megjithat\u00eb, parimi i siguris\u00eb juridike nuk<\/span>
\ngaranton \u00e7do lloj pritshm\u00ebrie p\u00ebr mosndryshim t\u00eb nj\u00eb situate t\u00eb favorshme ligjore dhe ai nuk<\/span>
\nmund t\u00eb prevaloj\u00eb n\u00eb \u00e7do rast. Kjo do t\u00eb thot\u00eb se n\u00ebse paraqitet rasti q\u00eb nj\u00eb rregullim ligjor<\/span>
\nndryshe i nj\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieje ndikohet drejtp\u00ebrdrejt nga nj\u00eb interes i r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm publik, me t\u00eb<\/span>
\ngjitha elementet e tij thelb\u00ebsore, ky interes mund t\u00eb ket\u00eb p\u00ebrpar\u00ebsi ndaj parimit t\u00eb siguris\u00eb<\/span>
\njuridike. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb pik\u00ebpamje, duhet par\u00eb n\u00eb \u00e7do rast se n\u00eb \u00e7far\u00eb mase dhe deri ku besimi q\u00eb ka<\/span>
\nqytetari n\u00eb situat\u00ebn e favorshme ligjore paraqitet i r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm p\u00ebr t\u2019u mbrojtur dhe cilat jan\u00eb<\/span>
\narsyet p\u00ebr nj\u00eb mbrojtje t\u00eb till\u00eb (shih vendimet nr. 1, dat\u00eb 16.01.2017; nr. 37, dat\u00eb 13.06.2012 t\u00eb<\/span>
\nGjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese).<\/span>
\n45. Gjykata v\u00ebren se n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs kushtetuese p\u00ebr arsimim neni 57, pika 4, i<\/span>
\nKushtetut\u00ebs ka parashikuar se ushtrimi i saj n\u00eb lidhje me arsimin e lart\u00eb kusht\u00ebzohet vet\u00ebm mbi<\/span>
\nkritere aft\u00ebsie. Detyrimet e vendosura n\u00eb nivel kushtetues jan\u00eb detajuar nga ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi, n\u00eb<\/span>
\np\u00ebrputhje me rezerv\u00ebn ligjore, i cili ka parashikuar rregullat dhe kriteret e pranimit n\u00eb arsimin e<\/span>
\nlart\u00eb, me q\u00ebllim materializimin dhe ushtrimin e k\u00ebsaj t\u00eb drejte. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim ligji nr. 80\/2015,<\/span>
\nq\u00eb ka p\u00ebrcaktuar edhe objektivat kryesor\u00eb t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb dhe k\u00ebrkimit shkencor dhe q\u00eb synon<\/span>
\nt\u00eb garantoj\u00eb mund\u00ebsi t\u00eb barabarta, mbi baz\u00ebn e merit\u00ebs, p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjith\u00eb individ\u00ebt q\u00eb duan t\u00eb ndjekin<\/span>
\nstudimet n\u00eb arsimin e lart\u00eb (neni 2), ka p\u00ebrcaktuar edhe se n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim t\u00eb programit t\u00eb studimit,<\/span>
\nsipas nenit 91 t\u00eb tij, studenti pajiset me diplom\u00ebn ose certifikat\u00ebn p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse. Elementet p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00ebse,<\/span>
\nforma e diplom\u00ebs dhe procedurat p\u00ebr regjistrimin p\u00ebrcaktohen nga ministria p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebse p\u00ebr<\/span>
\narsimin.<\/span>
\n46. P\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, n\u00eb koh\u00ebn kur kan\u00eb filluar studimet e larta n\u00eb Fakultetin e Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb, si<\/span>
\nedhe kur kan\u00eb konkurruar p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb q\u00ebllim student\u00ebt q\u00eb jan\u00eb subjekt i ligjit nr. 60\/2023, kriteret e<\/span>
\npranimit dhe rregulli p\u00ebr pajisjen me diplom\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim t\u00eb programit t\u00eb studimeve kan\u00eb qen\u00eb<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nt\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuara nga ligji nr. 80\/2015, me t\u00eb cilat ata jan\u00eb njohur dhe i kan\u00eb pranuar si t\u00eb tilla, ashtu<\/span>
\nsi edhe tarifat e studimit t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuara nga institucioni p\u00ebrkat\u00ebs i arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb.<\/span>
\n47. Me ligjin nr. 60\/2023 ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi ka p\u00ebrcaktuar disa rregulla t\u00eb ve\u00e7anta p\u00ebr trajtimin e<\/span>
\nstudent\u00ebve q\u00eb ndjekin programin e integruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e p\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d<\/span>
\nn\u00eb institucionet publike t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb, duke synuar sigurimin e burimeve njer\u00ebzore p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nkryerjen e sh\u00ebrbimeve t\u00eb sh\u00ebndetit publik n\u00eb institucionet sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore n\u00eb Republik\u00ebn e<\/span>
\nShqip\u00ebris\u00eb (nenet 1 dhe 2). Me k\u00ebt\u00eb ligj \u00ebsht\u00eb parashikuar koncepti i \u201ctrajtimit t\u00eb ve\u00e7ant\u00eb\u201d t\u00eb<\/span>
\nstudent\u00ebve t\u00eb mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb, i cili nuk gjendet n\u00eb ligjin nr. 80\/2015, dhe q\u00eb p\u00ebrfshin pun\u00ebsimin me<\/span>
\nprioritet t\u00eb studentit q\u00eb ndjek programin e integruar n\u00eb Fakultetin e Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb UMT, si dhe<\/span>
\np\u00ebrfitimin nga programet sociale t\u00eb strehimit. Ky trajtim i ve\u00e7ant\u00eb zbatohet si ndaj student\u00ebve q\u00eb<\/span>
\njan\u00eb n\u00eb vazhdim t\u00eb studimeve t\u00eb tyre n\u00eb Fakultetin e Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb (konkretisht student\u00ebt e vitit t\u00eb<\/span>
\ndyt\u00eb deri n\u00eb vitin e kat\u00ebrt dhe ata t\u00eb vitit t\u00eb pest\u00eb ose t\u00eb gjasht\u00eb), ashtu edhe ndaj atyre q\u00eb<\/span>
\npranohen n\u00eb vitin e par\u00eb t\u00eb programit t\u00eb integruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e<\/span>
\np\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb institucionet publike t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb n\u00ebse n\u00ebnshkruajn\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjen q\u00eb<\/span>
\nlidhet mes tyre dhe ministris\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebse p\u00ebr arsimin e p\u00ebr sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsin\u00eb dhe institucionit t\u00eb<\/span>
\narsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb publik, p\u00ebrmes s\u00eb cil\u00ebs pranojn\u00eb t\u00eb punojn\u00eb n\u00eb profesionin e mjekut pas<\/span>
\np\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb studimeve p\u00ebr jo m\u00eb pak se, p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsisht, tre, dy dhe pes\u00eb vjet, q\u00eb shoq\u00ebrohet me<\/span>
\nkalimin zyrtarisht t\u00eb diplom\u00ebs nga institucioni ku kan\u00eb p\u00ebrfunduar studimet n\u00eb institucionin<\/span>
\nsh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor ku pun\u00ebsohen deri n\u00eb \u201cshlyerjen e detyrimeve p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim\u201d, e cila mund t\u00eb t\u00ebrhiqet<\/span>
\npas p\u00ebrmbushjes s\u00eb k\u00ebtij detyrimi sipas afateve p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse. Sipas nenit 5 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023, n\u00eb<\/span>
\nrast t\u00eb mosn\u00ebnshkrimit t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj marr\u00ebveshjeje, studenti paguan vler\u00ebn e plot\u00eb t\u00eb kostos s\u00eb<\/span>
\nstudimeve p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse, sipas mas\u00ebs q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb miratuar me aktet n\u00ebnligjore t\u00eb organeve t\u00eb UMT-s\u00eb, e<\/span>
\ncila rezulton t\u00eb jet\u00eb rritur n\u00eb krahasim me tarif\u00ebn q\u00eb ata kan\u00eb paguar p\u00ebrpara hyrjes n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb<\/span>
\nk\u00ebtij ligji.<\/span>
\n48. Bazuar n\u00eb sa m\u00eb sip\u00ebr, Gjykata v\u00ebren se, n\u00eb ndryshim nga parashikimet e ligjit nr.<\/span>
\n80\/2015, dispozitat e kund\u00ebrshtuara t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023 kan\u00eb ndryshuar situat\u00ebn ligjore t\u00eb<\/span>
\nstudent\u00ebve t\u00eb mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb k\u00ebtyre elementeve: (i) vendosja para zgjedhjes p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nn\u00ebnshkrimin e nj\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjeje p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim; (ii) n\u00eb rast t\u00eb n\u00ebnshkrimit t\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjes studenti<\/span>
\nnuk pajiset me diplom\u00eb pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb studimeve, por ajo mbahet nga institucioni<\/span>
\nsh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor ku ai pun\u00ebsohet, sipas afatit t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuar nga k\u00ebto dispozita dhe l\u00ebshohet vet\u00ebm pas<\/span>
\n\u201cshlyerjes s\u00eb detyrimeve p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim\u201d; (iii) n\u00eb rast t\u00eb mosn\u00ebnshkrimit t\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjes paguhet<\/span>
\nkosto e plot\u00eb e studimeve e miratuar me akte n\u00ebnligjore t\u00eb organeve t\u00eb UMT-s\u00eb.<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\n49. K\u00ebto ndryshime, n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e Gjykat\u00ebs, p\u00ebrb\u00ebjn\u00eb nj\u00eb p\u00ebrkeq\u00ebsim t\u00eb situat\u00ebs ligjore<\/span>
\nt\u00eb student\u00ebve t\u00eb mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb, si t\u00eb atyre t\u00eb nd\u00ebrmjet\u00ebm, ashtu edhe t\u00eb student\u00ebve q\u00eb hyjn\u00eb rishtazi<\/span>
\nn\u00eb Fakultetin e Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb UMT, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt nuk jan\u00eb njohur me k\u00ebt\u00eb situat\u00eb dhe nuk e kan\u00eb<\/span>
\npranuar at\u00eb n\u00eb momentin q\u00eb kan\u00eb vendosur t\u00eb konkurrojn\u00eb pran\u00eb atij fakulteti. N\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb s\u00eb<\/span>
\ndrejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr arsimim, si\u00e7 u theksua m\u00eb sip\u00ebr, ligji nr. 80\/2015 ka parashikuar p\u00ebrve\u00e7 kritereve,<\/span>
\nprocedurave dhe rregullave p\u00ebr zhvillimin e programit m\u00ebsimor, edhe t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr pajisjen me<\/span>
\ndiplom\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim t\u00eb k\u00ebtij programi, sipas secilit cik\u00ebl t\u00eb studimeve. Th\u00ebn\u00eb kjo, parashikimet<\/span>
\nligjore t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuara q\u00eb parashikojn\u00eb se student\u00ebt, n\u00eb rast t\u00eb n\u00ebnshkrimit t\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjes nuk<\/span>
\nkan\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u00eb pajisen me diplom\u00eb, por kjo e fundit kalohet zyrtarisht nga institucioni i arsimit<\/span>
\nt\u00eb lart\u00eb n\u00eb institucionin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor ku studenti do t\u00eb pun\u00ebsohet dhe i l\u00ebshohet atij vet\u00ebm me<\/span>
\n\u201cshlyerjen e detyrimeve p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim\u201d, kan\u00eb sjell\u00eb pasoja negative n\u00eb t\u00eb drejtat e fituara t\u00eb tyre,<\/span>
\nsipas parashikimeve ligjore t\u00eb miratuara n\u00eb kuptim dhe zbatim t\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr arsimim.<\/span>
\nP\u00ebrkeq\u00ebsimi i situat\u00ebs ligjore t\u00eb student\u00ebve, duke parashikuar detyrime dhe rregulla t\u00eb reja, t\u00eb<\/span>
\ncilat ata nuk i kan\u00eb njohur dhe as nuk i kan\u00eb pranuar m\u00eb par\u00eb, nuk p\u00ebrputhet me parimin e<\/span>
\nsiguris\u00eb juridike, p\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb pretendimi i k\u00ebrkuesve n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim \u00ebsht\u00eb i bazuar.<\/span>
\n50. N\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e Gjykat\u00ebs, k\u00ebto ndryshime ligjore prekin n\u00eb dukje t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e<\/span>
\nparashikuar nga neni 49, pika 1, i Kushtetut\u00ebs, sipas t\u00eb cil\u00ebs secili ka t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u00eb fitoj\u00eb mjetet e<\/span>
\njetes\u00ebs me pun\u00eb q\u00eb e ka zgjedhur ose pranuar vet\u00eb, si dhe t\u00eb zgjedh\u00eb vet\u00eb vendin e pun\u00ebs (e drejta<\/span>
\np\u00ebr pun\u00eb). P\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, n\u00eb vijim ajo do t\u00eb ndalet n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin n\u00ebse kjo e drejt\u00eb kushtetuese e<\/span>
\nstudent\u00ebve \u00ebsht\u00eb kufizuar dhe n\u00ebse arrin n\u00eb nj\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigje pozitive n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim, do t\u00eb vler\u00ebsoj\u00eb<\/span>
\nn\u00ebse ky kufizim plot\u00ebson kriteret e nenit 17 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs.<\/span>
\nC.2. P\u00ebr cenimin e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr pun\u00eb<\/span>
\n51. Sipas k\u00ebrkuesve, kjo e drejt\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb kufizuar n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me kriteret e nenit 17 t\u00eb<\/span>
\nKushtetut\u00ebs, pasi nuk i p\u00ebrgjigjet as interesit publik, as objektivave t\u00eb vet\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023,<\/span>
\nmasat e p\u00ebrdorura jan\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb ashpra se sa duhet p\u00ebr t\u00eb arritur objektivin e k\u00ebrkuar dhe kufizimi<\/span>
\nnuk \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrpjes\u00ebtim t\u00eb drejt\u00eb me gjendjen q\u00eb e ka diktuar, duke cenuar parimin e<\/span>
\nproporcionalitetit. Sipas tyre, parashikimi i nenit 5 t\u00eb ligjit nuk i p\u00ebrgjigjet objektivit kryesor t\u00eb<\/span>
\ntij, q\u00eb ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me sigurimin e stafit mjek\u00ebsor n\u00eb periudh\u00eb afatgjat\u00eb dhe sanksioni ekonomik i<\/span>
\nvendosur nga kjo dispozit\u00eb i detyron student\u00ebt n\u00eb gjendje t\u00eb v\u00ebshtir\u00eb ekonomike t\u00eb pranojn\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\nlidhin marr\u00ebveshjen ose nd\u00ebshkon student\u00ebt q\u00eb nuk pranojn\u00eb ta n\u00ebnshkruajn\u00eb at\u00eb, duke rritur n\u00eb<\/span>
\nm\u00ebnyr\u00eb eksponenciale tarif\u00ebn e studimit. N\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e k\u00ebrkuesve nuk ekziston nj\u00eb situat\u00eb<\/span>
\nemergjente, pasi nuk ka ulje t\u00eb numrit t\u00eb mjek\u00ebve n\u00eb raport me popullsin\u00eb dhe mjetet e p\u00ebrdorura<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nnuk jan\u00eb t\u00eb domosdoshme, q\u00eb do t\u00eb thot\u00eb se synimi mund t\u00eb arrihej me mjete t\u00eb tjera dhe stimuj<\/span>
\nt\u00eb tjer\u00eb ekonomik\u00eb ose social\u00eb, si dhe nd\u00ebrhyrja nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e p\u00ebrshtatshme p\u00ebr realizimin e<\/span>
\nq\u00ebllimit t\u00eb synuar. Sipas k\u00ebrkuesve, masat nuk jan\u00eb t\u00eb lidhura n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb arsyeshme me<\/span>
\nobjektivin, jan\u00eb arbitrare, t\u00eb padrejta dhe t\u00eb bazuara n\u00eb vler\u00ebsime alogjike, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb edhe<\/span>
\nmasa e mbajtjes s\u00eb diplom\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u00eb mund\u00ebsuar zbatimin e ligjit \u00ebsht\u00eb e pajustifikueshme, pasi<\/span>
\nshteti i ka t\u00eb gjitha mjetet ligjore p\u00ebr t\u00eb garantuar zbatimin e marr\u00ebveshjes s\u00eb n\u00ebnshkruar me<\/span>
\nstudent\u00ebt.<\/span>
\n52. Subjekti i interesuar, Kuvendi, ka prap\u00ebsuar se plot\u00ebsohen kriteret e nenit 17 t\u00eb<\/span>
\nKushtetut\u00ebs, sepse e drejta p\u00ebr kujdes sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor synon mbrojtjen e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb jet\u00ebs, p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nrrjedhoj\u00eb shteti ka interes publik q\u00eb t\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyj\u00eb n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb aspekt, pasi ekziston nj\u00eb nevoj\u00eb mjaft e<\/span>
\nlart\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb garantuar plot\u00ebsimin e sh\u00ebrbimeve t\u00eb sh\u00ebndetit publik me burime njer\u00ebzore. Sipas tij,<\/span>
\ninteresi publik n\u00eb garantimin e sh\u00ebrbimit mjek\u00ebsor p\u00ebr popullsin\u00eb mbizot\u00ebron ndaj pritshm\u00ebris\u00eb<\/span>
\ns\u00eb student\u00ebve. Alternativat q\u00eb paraqet ligji kan\u00eb t\u00eb b\u00ebjn\u00eb me t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e studentit p\u00ebr t\u00eb zgjedhur<\/span>
\nn\u00ebse d\u00ebshiron t\u00eb p\u00ebrfitoj\u00eb leht\u00ebsit\u00eb q\u00eb krijohen me n\u00ebnshkrimin e marr\u00ebveshjes p\u00ebr t\u00eb punuar n\u00eb<\/span>
\nprofesionin e mjekut, pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb studimeve, n\u00eb institucionet sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore n\u00eb vend dhe<\/span>
\njan\u00eb hartuar n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me nevojat e diktuara n\u00eb vend. Sipas k\u00ebtij subjekti, ligji garanton<\/span>
\npun\u00ebsimin e mjek\u00ebve t\u00eb diplomuar dhe nuk ka cenim n\u00eb thelbin e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr pun\u00eb, p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nrrjedhoj\u00eb nuk ka tejkalim t\u00eb kufizimeve t\u00eb parashikuara n\u00eb KEDNJ.<\/span>
\n53. Subjekti i interesuar, K\u00ebshilli i Ministrave, ka prap\u00ebsuar se jan\u00eb respektuar kriteret e<\/span>
\nparashikuara n\u00eb nenin 17 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs dhe se interesi publik n\u00eb garantimin e sh\u00ebrbimit<\/span>
\nmjek\u00ebsor p\u00ebr popullsin\u00eb mbizot\u00ebron ndaj pritshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb k\u00ebrkuesve, e cila nuk mund t\u00eb ket\u00eb<\/span>
\nprioritet. Sipas tij, ligji ndihmon n\u00eb mbajtjen e talentit vendas n\u00eb sistemin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor shqiptar,<\/span>
\nduke parandaluar largimin e tij jasht\u00eb shtetit dhe p\u00ebrmes dispozitave t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuara synohet<\/span>
\npun\u00ebsim sa m\u00eb i shpejt\u00eb i student\u00ebve t\u00eb mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb, duke detyruar institucionet pun\u00ebdh\u00ebn\u00ebse p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nrespektimin e k\u00ebtij parashikimi ligjor, i cili, n\u00eb rast t\u00eb mosrespektimit brenda nj\u00eb viti nga<\/span>
\nmomenti i lindjes s\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim p\u00ebr student\u00ebt, konsiderohet i p\u00ebrmbushur. Sipas k\u00ebtij<\/span>
\nsubjekti, ligji ka efekt t\u00eb p\u00ebrkohsh\u00ebm dhe pavar\u00ebsisht politikave t\u00eb zbatuara ka nevoj\u00eb imediate<\/span>
\np\u00ebr t\u00eb adresuar n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb shteruese fenomenin e largimit t\u00eb mjek\u00ebve nga sistemi dhe nga vendi.<\/span>
\nSipas tij, dispozitat ligjore u japin student\u00ebve t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn t\u00eb zgjedhin kushtet p\u00ebr trajtimin e<\/span>
\nve\u00e7ant\u00eb dhe detyrimin e pun\u00ebsimit pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb studimeve n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb respekton<\/span>
\nlirin\u00eb dhe vullnetin e individit.<\/span>
\n54. N\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 49, pika 1, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, n\u00eb jurisprudenc\u00ebn kushtetuese \u00ebsht\u00eb<\/span>
\ntheksuar se kjo e drejt\u00eb p\u00ebrfshin zgjedhjen e profesionit, vendit t\u00eb pun\u00ebs, si dhe sistemit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nkualifikimit profesional, me q\u00ebllim sigurimin e mjeteve t\u00eb jetes\u00ebs n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb ligjshme.<\/span>
\nZgjedhja e profesionit, si\u00e7 parashikohet nga dispozita kushtetuese, \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb e drejt\u00eb e individit,<\/span>
\nn\u00eb kuptimin q\u00eb ai i p\u00ebrkushtohet nj\u00eb veprimtarie p\u00ebr t\u00eb siguruar mjetet e jetes\u00ebs. Kjo e drejt\u00eb<\/span>
\np\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrfituar me pun\u00eb t\u00eb ligjshme fiton r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi edhe nga pik\u00ebpamja sociale, pasi puna si<\/span>
\nprofesion \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb vler\u00eb edhe p\u00ebr kontributin q\u00eb i sjell shoq\u00ebris\u00eb n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsi (shih vendimet nr.<\/span>
\n17, dat\u00eb 23.03.2023; nr. 9, dat\u00eb 23.03.2010; nr. 20, dat\u00eb 11.07.2006 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese).<\/span>
\n55. Gjykata vler\u00ebson t\u00eb theksoj\u00eb se edhe e drejta p\u00ebr t\u00eb fituar mjetet e jetes\u00ebs me pun\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\nzgjedhur dhe pranuar vet\u00eb dhe p\u00ebr t\u00eb zgjedhur vendin e pun\u00ebs, e garantuar nga neni 49, pika 1, i<\/span>
\nKushtetut\u00ebs nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb absolute dhe ajo mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb objekt i kufizimeve n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me kriteret<\/span>
\ne nenit 17 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, i cili lejon kufizimin e t\u00eb drejtave dhe lirive themelore vet\u00ebm me ligj,<\/span>
\np\u00ebr interes publik ose mbrojtjen e t\u00eb drejtave t\u00eb t\u00eb tjer\u00ebve. Po n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj dispozite,<\/span>
\nkufizimi duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrpjes\u00ebtim me gjendjen q\u00eb e ka diktuar at\u00eb, t\u00eb mos cenoj\u00eb thelbin e<\/span>
\nlirive dhe t\u00eb drejtave, si dhe t\u00eb mos tejkaloj\u00eb kufizimet e parashikuara nga KEDNJ-ja.<\/span>
\n56. Gjykata v\u00ebren, si\u00e7 theksoi m\u00eb sip\u00ebr gjat\u00eb trajtimit t\u00eb parimit t\u00eb siguris\u00eb juridike, se me<\/span>
\nmiratimin e ligjit nr. 60\/2023 ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi ka pasur si q\u00ebllim t\u00eb siguroj\u00eb burimet njer\u00ebzore p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nkryerjen e sh\u00ebrbimeve t\u00eb sh\u00ebndetit publik n\u00eb institucionet sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore n\u00eb Republik\u00ebn e<\/span>
\nShqip\u00ebris\u00eb n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet p\u00ebrcaktimit t\u00eb rregullave p\u00ebr trajtimin e ve\u00e7ant\u00eb t\u00eb student\u00ebve q\u00eb ndjekin<\/span>
\nprogramin e integruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e p\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb institucionet<\/span>
\npublike t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb (neni 2). Koncepti \u201ctrajtim i ve\u00e7ant\u00eb\u201d, sipas k\u00ebtij ligji, p\u00ebrfshin<\/span>
\npun\u00ebsimin me prioritet t\u00eb studentit q\u00eb ndjek programin e integruar n\u00eb Fakultetin e Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb<\/span>
\nUMT, si dhe p\u00ebrfitimin nga programet sociale t\u00eb strehimit dhe ai zbatohet si p\u00ebr studentet q\u00eb jan\u00eb<\/span>
\nn\u00eb vazhdim t\u00eb studimeve t\u00eb tyre n\u00eb Fakultetin e Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb, ashtu edhe p\u00ebr ata q\u00eb regjistrohen n\u00eb<\/span>
\nvitin e par\u00eb t\u00eb programit t\u00eb studimeve, me kushtin e n\u00ebnshkrimit t\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjes me ministrin\u00eb<\/span>
\np\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebse p\u00ebr arsimin, ministrin\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebse p\u00ebr sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsin\u00eb dhe institucionin e arsimit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nlart\u00eb publik (neni 4, pika 1, shkronja \u201cc\u201d, pika 2, shkronja \u201cb\u201d dhe pika 3, shkronja \u201cb\u201d, t\u00eb ligjit<\/span>
\nnr. 60\/2023) p\u00ebrmes s\u00eb cil\u00ebs studenti pranon t\u00eb punoj\u00eb n\u00eb profesionin e mjekut pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nstudimeve p\u00ebr jo m\u00eb pak se pes\u00eb, tre dhe dy vjet, periudh\u00eb gjat\u00eb s\u00eb cil\u00ebs diploma q\u00ebndron pran\u00eb<\/span>
\ninstitucionit sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor ku pun\u00ebsohet deri n\u00eb \u201cshlyerjen e detyrimeve p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim\u201d sipas k\u00ebtyre<\/span>
\nafateve. N\u00eb rast t\u00eb mosn\u00ebnshkrimit t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj marr\u00ebveshjeje, neni 5 i ligjit parashikon se studenti<\/span>
\npaguan vler\u00ebn e plot\u00eb t\u00eb kostos s\u00eb studimeve p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse, e cila miratohet me akte n\u00ebnligjore.<\/span>
\n57. P\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, Gjykata vler\u00ebson se parashikimet ligjore t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuara kan\u00eb prekur t\u00eb<\/span>
\ndrejtat e student\u00ebve t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb UMT, si t\u00eb atyre t\u00eb nd\u00ebrmjet\u00ebm, q\u00eb kan\u00eb filluar<\/span>
\ndhe vijuar studimet n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me nj\u00eb korniz\u00eb tjet\u00ebr ligjore, ashtu edhe t\u00eb student\u00ebve q\u00eb kan\u00eb<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nhyr\u00eb rishtazi n\u00eb Fakultetin e Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt nuk i kan\u00eb njohur dhe pranuar rregullimet e reja<\/span>
\nligjore n\u00eb momentin q\u00eb kan\u00eb vendosur t\u00eb zgjedhin k\u00ebt\u00eb profesion, pra t\u00eb konkurrojn\u00eb pran\u00eb atij<\/span>
\nfakulteti. Parashikimi i instrumenteve t\u00eb reja ligjore q\u00eb lejon ekzekutimin e skem\u00ebs s\u00eb hyrjes n\u00eb<\/span>
\npun\u00ebsim sjell nd\u00ebrhyrje n\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn kushtetuese p\u00ebr t\u00eb pranuar dhe zgjedhur vet\u00eb vendin e<\/span>
\npun\u00ebs, n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 49 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, p\u00ebr sa koh\u00eb i vendos student\u00ebt para zgjedhjes s\u00eb<\/span>
\nn\u00ebnshkrimit t\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjes ose, n\u00eb t\u00eb kund\u00ebrt, pages\u00ebs s\u00eb vler\u00ebs s\u00eb plot\u00eb t\u00eb kostos s\u00eb studimeve.<\/span>
\nN\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e Gjykat\u00ebs, n\u00eb themel t\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs kushtetuese p\u00ebr pun\u00eb q\u00ebndron vullneti i<\/span>
\nindividit p\u00ebr t\u00eb siguruar mjetet e jetes\u00ebs me pun\u00eb t\u00eb zgjedhur ose t\u00eb pranuar prej tij, vullnet q\u00eb n\u00eb<\/span>
\nk\u00ebt\u00eb rast rezulton t\u00eb jet\u00eb i vesuar p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb formul\u00ebs t\u00eb p\u00ebrzgjedhur nga ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi p\u00ebr t\u00eb v\u00ebn\u00eb<\/span>
\nn\u00eb zbatim skem\u00ebn e re t\u00eb pun\u00ebsimit t\u00eb student\u00ebve t\u00eb mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb studimeve. Kjo<\/span>
\nnd\u00ebrhyrje e ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsit p\u00ebrb\u00ebn kufizim t\u00eb ushtrimit lirisht t\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb student\u00ebve q\u00eb pas<\/span>
\np\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb studimeve t\u00eb zgjedhin, n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me kualifikimin e tyre profesional, vendin e<\/span>
\npun\u00ebs ku d\u00ebshirojn\u00eb t\u00eb ushtrojn\u00eb profesionin n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn dhe form\u00ebn q\u00eb ata vendosin vet\u00eb. P\u00ebr<\/span>
\nrrjedhoj\u00eb, detyrimi i student\u00ebve q\u00eb n\u00eb rast t\u00eb lidhjes s\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjes me koh\u00ebzgjatje dy, tre dhe<\/span>
\npes\u00ebvje\u00e7are t\u00eb punojn\u00eb, p\u00ebrgjat\u00eb k\u00ebsaj periudhe, pran\u00eb institucionit sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor ku kalohet<\/span>
\ndiploma nga institucioni i arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb publik deri n\u00eb \u201cshlyerjen e detyrimeve p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim\u201d,<\/span>
\np\u00ebrb\u00ebn kufizim t\u00eb nenit 49, pika 1, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs.<\/span>
\n58. Th\u00ebn\u00eb sa m\u00eb sip\u00ebr, Gjykata do t\u00eb vler\u00ebsoj\u00eb n\u00eb vijim n\u00ebse ky kufizim ka respektuar<\/span>
\nkriteret e nenit 17 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, pra n\u00ebse \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb me ligj, p\u00ebr interes publik dhe n\u00ebse \u00ebsht\u00eb<\/span>
\nrespektuar kriteri i p\u00ebrpjes\u00ebtimit midis nd\u00ebrhyrjes dhe gjendjes q\u00eb e ka diktuar at\u00eb.<\/span>
\n59. N\u00eb lidhje me kriterin e par\u00eb t\u00eb kufizimit \u201cvet\u00ebm me ligj\u201d, q\u00ebllimi i tij \u00ebsht\u00eb ofrimi i<\/span>
\ngarancive sa m\u00eb t\u00eb plota n\u00eb rastin e kufizimeve dhe p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb shkak kompetent duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb vet\u00ebm<\/span>
\nnj\u00eb organ dhe pik\u00ebrisht organi m\u00eb i lart\u00eb ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebs (shih vendimet nr. 21, dat\u00eb 18.04.2023; nr. 4,<\/span>
\ndat\u00eb 21.02.2022; nr. 11, dat\u00eb 09.03.2021 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese). Gjykata v\u00ebren se ky kriter<\/span>
\n\u00ebsht\u00eb respektuar, pasi nd\u00ebrhyrja \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb me ligjin nr. 60\/2023, i cili \u00ebsht\u00eb miratuar nga<\/span>
\nKuvendi, sipas procedurave t\u00eb parashikuara p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb q\u00ebllim.<\/span>
\n60. P\u00ebr sa i p\u00ebrket kriterit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb t\u00eb kufizimit, p\u00ebr interes publik, Gjykata ka theksuar se<\/span>
\n\u00ebsht\u00eb e v\u00ebshtir\u00eb t\u00eb radhiten n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb shteruese \u00e7\u00ebshtjet q\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebjn\u00eb interes publik ose t\u00eb arsyes<\/span>
\npublike q\u00eb \u00e7ojn\u00eb n\u00eb kufizimin e nj\u00eb t\u00eb drejte themelore, pasi interesi publik duhet kuptuar n\u00eb<\/span>
\nsensin relativ, n\u00eb var\u00ebsi t\u00eb situatave t\u00eb ndryshme q\u00eb krijohen. Ato mund t\u00eb renditen vet\u00ebm<\/span>
\nnegativisht, pra n\u00eb aspektin e kufizimit t\u00eb \u00e7do rasti konkret. N\u00eb praktik\u00ebn kushtetuese \u00ebsht\u00eb<\/span>
\npranuar tashm\u00eb se ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi, parimisht, \u00ebsht\u00eb i lir\u00eb t\u00eb veproj\u00eb brenda hap\u00ebsir\u00ebs s\u00eb tij normuese,<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nduke p\u00ebrcaktuar qart\u00eb dhe rast pas rasti q\u00ebllimet q\u00eb k\u00ebrkon t\u00eb arrij\u00eb (shih vendimet nr. 20, dat\u00eb<\/span>
\n20.04.2021; nr. 16, dat\u00eb 01.03.2017; nr. 1, dat\u00eb 16.01.2017 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese).<\/span>
\n61. Gjykata vler\u00ebson se, referuar subjekteve t\u00eb interesuara, Kuvendit dhe K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMinistrave, interesi publik i evidentuar n\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen konkrete \u00ebsht\u00eb i lidhur drejtp\u00ebrdrejt me<\/span>
\nmir\u00ebfunksionimin e skem\u00ebs s\u00eb kujdesit sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor dhe garantimin e plot\u00ebsimit t\u00eb nevojave p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nburime njer\u00ebzore n\u00eb kryerjen e sh\u00ebrbimeve t\u00eb sh\u00ebndetit publik n\u00eb institucionet sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore, i cili<\/span>
\nrezulton t\u00eb jet\u00eb i lart\u00eb, prandaj ligji \u00ebsht\u00eb hartuar n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me nevojat e diktuara n\u00eb vend.<\/span>
\nGjykata v\u00ebren se sipas nenit 55 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs shtetasit g\u00ebzojn\u00eb n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb barabart\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn<\/span>
\np\u00ebr kujdes sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor dhe sigurim sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor nga shteti, i cili ka detyrimin p\u00ebr t\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyr\u00eb me<\/span>
\nq\u00ebllim sigurimin e saj p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjith\u00eb qytetar\u00ebt p\u00ebrmes ofrimit t\u00eb kujdesit sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor n\u00eb<\/span>
\ninstitucionet e sh\u00ebndetit publik. Kurse sipas nenit 59, pika 1, shkronja \u201cc\u201d, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, shteti,<\/span>
\nbrenda kompetencave kushtetuese dhe mjeteve q\u00eb disponon, synon edhe standardin m\u00eb t\u00eb lart\u00eb<\/span>
\nsh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor t\u00eb mundsh\u00ebm. Referuar nenit 2 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023, ai synon sigurimin e burimeve<\/span>
\nnjer\u00ebzore p\u00ebr kryerjen e sh\u00ebrbimeve t\u00eb sh\u00ebndetit publik n\u00eb institucionet sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore n\u00eb<\/span>
\nRepublik\u00ebn e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet p\u00ebrcaktimit t\u00eb rregullave p\u00ebr trajtimin e ve\u00e7ant\u00eb t\u00eb student\u00ebve<\/span>
\nq\u00eb ndjekin programin e integruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e p\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb<\/span>
\ninstitucionet publike t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb. P\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, Gjykata vler\u00ebson se n\u00eb rastin konkret ka nj\u00eb<\/span>
\ninteres publik q\u00eb ka justifikuar nd\u00ebrhyrjen n\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e student\u00ebve p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim, p\u00ebr sa koh\u00eb q\u00eb<\/span>
\nme rregullimet ligjore t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuara synohet t\u00eb garantohet ofrimi i sh\u00ebrbimit sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor, n\u00eb<\/span>
\nkuptim t\u00eb nenit 55, pika 1, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, si dhe garantimi i standardeve t\u00eb sh\u00ebndetit publik,<\/span>
\nsipas nenit 59, pika 1, shkronja \u201cc\u201d, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs.<\/span>
\n62. N\u00eb kushtet kur jan\u00eb p\u00ebrmbushur dy kriteret e m\u00ebsip\u00ebrme t\u00eb kufizimit, Gjykata vler\u00ebson<\/span>
\nt\u00eb analizoj\u00eb kriterin tjet\u00ebr, at\u00eb t\u00eb proporcionalitetit t\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrjes, n\u00eb thelb t\u00eb t\u00eb cilit q\u00ebndron<\/span>
\nekuilibrimi i drejt\u00eb i interesave, vler\u00ebsimi objektiv, si dhe shmangia e konfliktit n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet<\/span>
\np\u00ebrzgjedhjes s\u00eb mjeteve t\u00eb duhura p\u00ebr realizimin e tyre (shih vendimet nr. 30, dat\u00eb 05.07.2021;<\/span>
\nnr. 20, dat\u00eb 20.04.2021; nr. 16, dat\u00eb 01.03.2017 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese). P\u00ebr vler\u00ebsimin e<\/span>
\nproporcionalitetit t\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrjes merret n\u00eb shqyrtim balanca nd\u00ebrmjet d\u00ebmit t\u00eb shkaktuar individit<\/span>
\ndhe s\u00eb mir\u00ebs s\u00eb p\u00ebrgjithshme t\u00eb shoq\u00ebris\u00eb, masa e mbrojtjes nga arbitrariteti q\u00eb ofrojn\u00eb<\/span>
\nprocedurat ligjore, si dhe mund\u00ebsia e shtetit p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrdorur m\u00ebnyra a mjete t\u00eb tjera p\u00ebr t\u00eb arritur<\/span>
\nq\u00ebllimin. Shteti, brenda mund\u00ebsive, duhet t\u00eb kufizoj\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrjen n\u00eb minimum, duke k\u00ebrkuar<\/span>
\nzgjidhje alternative dhe, p\u00ebrgjith\u00ebsisht, duke u p\u00ebrpjekur t\u2019i arrij\u00eb q\u00ebllimet n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb sa m\u00eb pak<\/span>
\nt\u00eb d\u00ebmshme nga pik\u00ebpamja e t\u00eb drejtave t\u00eb njeriut (shih vendimin nr. 17, dat\u00eb 23.04.2010 t\u00eb<\/span>
\nGjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese). Masat mund t\u00eb jen\u00eb t\u00eb shum\u00ebllojshme, por ajo q\u00eb ka r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\n\u00ebsht\u00eb q\u00eb thelbi i k\u00ebtij aktiviteti t\u00eb individit t\u00eb mos cenohet deri n\u00eb at\u00eb mas\u00eb sa t\u00eb b\u00ebhet i<\/span>
\npamundur ushtrimi i tij (shih vendimet nr. 37, dat\u00eb 01.12.2022; nr. 52, dat\u00eb 05.12.2012; nr. 18,<\/span>
\ndat\u00eb 14.05.2003 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese).<\/span>
\n63. Parimi i proporcionalitetit imponon evidentimin e nevoj\u00ebs reale t\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrjes n\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\ndrejtat individuale n\u00eb nj\u00eb situat\u00eb konkrete (shih vendimet nr. 20, dat\u00eb 20.04.2021; nr. 1, dat\u00eb<\/span>
\n16.01.2017 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese). P\u00ebrve\u00e7 k\u00ebsaj, p\u00ebrdorimi i k\u00ebtyre mjeteve duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb i<\/span>
\ndomosdosh\u00ebm, \u00e7ka do t\u00eb thot\u00eb se synimi nuk mund t\u00eb arrihet me mjete t\u00eb tjera. Domosdoshm\u00ebria<\/span>
\nlidhet edhe me p\u00ebrdorimin e mjeteve m\u00eb pak t\u00eb d\u00ebmshme p\u00ebr subjektet q\u00eb u cenohen t\u00eb drejtat<\/span>
\ndhe lirit\u00eb. N\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb n\u00ebnkriterit t\u00eb domosdoshm\u00ebris\u00eb, n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e Gjykat\u00ebs kufizimi \u00ebsht\u00eb<\/span>
\njokushtetues n\u00ebse provohet se ka mjete t\u00eb tjera t\u00eb disponueshme q\u00eb do t\u00eb ishin n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb qart\u00eb<\/span>
\nefektive p\u00ebr arritjen e q\u00ebllimit, por, n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn koh\u00eb, edhe m\u00eb pak kufizuese t\u00eb t\u00eb drejtave dhe<\/span>
\nlirive themelore. Po k\u00ebshtu, nd\u00ebrhyrja p\u00ebr kufizimin e nj\u00eb t\u00eb drejte ose lirie t\u00eb b\u00ebhet me mjete t\u00eb<\/span>
\np\u00ebrshtatshme q\u00eb i p\u00ebrgjigjen drejt q\u00ebllimit q\u00eb synohet t\u00eb arrihet. P\u00ebr sa i p\u00ebrket n\u00ebnkriterit t\u00eb<\/span>
\np\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebris\u00eb, masa e nd\u00ebrmarr\u00eb si kufizuese e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs duhet t\u00eb sjell\u00eb efektin e duhur dhe t\u00eb<\/span>
\nrealizoj\u00eb synimin p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilin \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrzgjedhur (shih vendimet nr. 70, dat\u00eb 27.12.2023; nr. 30,<\/span>
\ndat\u00eb 05.07.2021; nr. 16, dat\u00eb 01.03.2017 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese).<\/span>
\n64. Gjykata thekson se ajo nuk ka kompetenc\u00eb t\u00eb analizoj\u00eb n\u00ebse masa e nd\u00ebrhyrjes \u00ebsht\u00eb<\/span>
\nm\u00eb e drejta dhe m\u00eb e duhura p\u00ebr arritjen e q\u00ebllimit t\u00eb synuar, por detyr\u00eb e saj \u00ebsht\u00eb t\u00eb vler\u00ebsoj\u00eb<\/span>
\nn\u00ebse ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi ka respektuar kufijt\u00eb kushtetues t\u00eb hap\u00ebsir\u00ebs s\u00eb tij vler\u00ebsuese. Sipas standardeve<\/span>
\nt\u00eb saj jurisprudenciale, Gjykata mban n\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb prezumimin e pajtueshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb aktit<\/span>
\nnormativ me Kushtetut\u00ebn, derisa pal\u00ebt t\u2019i provojn\u00eb asaj t\u00eb kund\u00ebrt\u00ebn (shih vendimet nr. 30, dat\u00eb<\/span>
\n02.11.2022; nr. 5, dat\u00eb 27.01.2017; nr. 52, dat\u00eb 26.07.2016 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese).<\/span>
\n65. N\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb n\u00ebnkriterit t\u00eb nevoj\u00ebs, q\u00eb k\u00ebrkon lidhjen e arsyeshme mes kufizimit dhe<\/span>
\ngjendjes q\u00eb k\u00ebrkon nd\u00ebrhyrje, Gjykata v\u00ebren se, si\u00e7 ka theksuar m\u00eb sip\u00ebr n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb interesit<\/span>
\npublik t\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrjes, q\u00ebllimi i miratimit t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023 \u00ebsht\u00eb garantimi nga shteti, p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nshtetasit e tij, i g\u00ebzimit n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb barabart\u00eb t\u00eb t\u00eb drejtave q\u00eb burojn\u00eb nga neni 55 i<\/span>
\nKushtetut\u00ebs. Situata faktike e evidentuar n\u00eb koh\u00ebn e miratimit t\u00eb k\u00ebtij ligji, e provuar edhe gjat\u00eb<\/span>
\nk\u00ebtij gjykimi dhe q\u00eb lidhet me problematikat n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb raportit t\u00eb numrit t\u00eb mjek\u00ebve dhe<\/span>
\npopullsis\u00eb, \u00ebsht\u00eb rrethan\u00eb q\u00eb b\u00ebn t\u00eb qart\u00eb ekzistenc\u00ebn e nevoj\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u00eb vepruar nga ana e<\/span>
\nligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsit n\u00eb miratimin e ligjit nr. 60\/2023, e cila \u00ebsht\u00eb e till\u00eb q\u00eb justifikon kufizimin e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs<\/span>
\np\u00ebr pun\u00eb t\u00eb garantuar nga neni 49, pika 1, i Kushtetut\u00ebs.<\/span>
\n66. N\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb n\u00ebnkriterit t\u00eb domosdoshm\u00ebris\u00eb, Gjykata v\u00ebren se pun\u00ebsimi me prioritet<\/span>
\ni mjek\u00ebve t\u00eb sapodiplomuar sipas nenit 4 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023, kusht\u00ebzohet: s\u00eb pari, me<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\npun\u00ebsimin n\u00eb institucionet sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore brenda vendit dhe, s\u00eb dyti, me pun\u00ebsimin me afat p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nnj\u00eb periudh\u00eb dy, tre ose pes\u00ebvje\u00e7are, q\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktohet nga viti akademik n\u00eb cilin \u00ebsht\u00eb duke kryer<\/span>
\nstudimet studenti q\u00eb pranon t\u00eb lidh\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjen me institucionin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor. Sipas fjalis\u00eb s\u00eb<\/span>
\npar\u00eb t\u00eb nenit 6 t\u00eb k\u00ebtij ligji, studenti q\u00eb p\u00ebrfundon programin e integruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb<\/span>
\ndyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e p\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb institucionet publike t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb dhe ka n\u00ebnshkruar<\/span>
\nmarr\u00ebveshje sipas p\u00ebrcaktimeve t\u00eb k\u00ebtij ligji pun\u00ebsohet me prioritet n\u00eb institucionet<\/span>
\nsh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore nga momenti i lindjes s\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim.<\/span>
\n67. Gjat\u00eb gjykimit rezultoi se numri i p\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm i mjek\u00ebve q\u00eb ofrojn\u00eb sh\u00ebrbim n\u00eb<\/span>
\nsistemin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor \u00ebsht\u00eb 5400, q\u00eb n\u00eb raport me numrin e popullsis\u00eb i takon 1.93 mjek\u00eb p\u00ebr \u00e7do<\/span>
\n1000 banor\u00eb. Numri i pozicioneve vakante p\u00ebr mjek\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb 482, numri i mjek\u00ebve n\u00eb mosh\u00eb<\/span>
\npensioni \u00ebsht\u00eb 213 dhe numri i mjek\u00ebve q\u00eb largohen \u00e7do vit jasht\u00eb vendit \u00ebsht\u00eb rreth 200. Bazuar<\/span>
\nn\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat e m\u00ebsip\u00ebrme, sikurse \u00ebsht\u00eb deklaruar n\u00eb seanc\u00eb edhe nga subjekti i interesuar,<\/span>
\nK\u00ebshilli i Ministrave, rezultojn\u00eb se jan\u00eb 1000 vende vakante p\u00ebr mjek\u00eb dhe aktualisht vendet<\/span>
\nvakante p\u00ebr mjek\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm n\u00eb sistemin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor jan\u00eb 4% e numrit total t\u00eb personelit<\/span>
\nmjek\u00ebsor n\u00eb kujdes par\u00ebsor. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb kuptim, Gjykata vler\u00ebson se parashikimi ligjor q\u00eb rregullon<\/span>
\nskem\u00ebn e pun\u00ebsimit t\u00eb student\u00ebve t\u00eb rinj q\u00eb diplomohen, me q\u00ebllim q\u00eb ata t\u00eb pun\u00ebsohen dhe t\u00eb<\/span>
\nsh\u00ebrbejn\u00eb n\u00eb sh\u00ebrbimin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor publik p\u00ebr t\u00eb siguruar nevojat e popullsis\u00eb n\u00eb t\u00eb gjith\u00eb<\/span>
\nvendin, n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb qytetar\u00ebt t\u00eb g\u00ebzojn\u00eb n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb barabart\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr kujdes<\/span>
\nsh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor, \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb mas\u00eb q\u00eb konsiderohet e domosdoshme p\u00ebr arritjen e synimit t\u00eb ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsit.<\/span>
\nSkema e re e hyrjes n\u00eb pun\u00ebsim e student\u00ebve t\u00eb mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb studimeve rezulton<\/span>
\nt\u00eb ket\u00eb qen\u00eb m\u00ebnyra p\u00ebr t\u00eb zgjidhur situat\u00ebn me t\u00eb cil\u00ebn po p\u00ebrballej sistemi sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor n\u00eb vend<\/span>
\ndhe p\u00ebr t\u00eb garantuar zbatimin e nenit 55 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs. Gjykata ka theksuar se lidhur me<\/span>
\njokushtetutshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e pretenduar argumentet e parashtruara duhet t\u00eb jen\u00eb bind\u00ebse, p\u00ebr t\u2019i dh\u00ebn\u00eb<\/span>
\nmund\u00ebsi asaj t\u00eb vler\u00ebsoj\u00eb n\u00ebse zgjidhjet e aplikuara shkelin normat dhe vlerat kushtetuese (shih<\/span>
\nvendimet nr. 30, dat\u00eb 02.11.2022; nr. 5, dat\u00eb 27.01.2017; nr. 52, dat\u00eb 26.07.2016 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs<\/span>
\nKushtetuese). N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb kuptim edhe nga vet\u00eb k\u00ebrkuesit, n\u00eb lidhje me mund\u00ebsit\u00eb reale p\u00ebr t\u00eb<\/span>
\nmiratuar ndonj\u00eb skem\u00eb tjet\u00ebr t\u00eb pun\u00ebsimit, nuk u evidentua ndonj\u00eb mas\u00eb ose skem\u00eb tjet\u00ebr q\u00eb<\/span>
\nmund t\u00eb p\u00ebrdorej n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim, e cila mund t\u00eb sillte t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin efekt t\u00eb d\u00ebshiruar dhe q\u00eb do t\u00eb<\/span>
\nishte eficiente p\u00ebr p\u00ebrmbushjen e q\u00ebllimit t\u00eb synuar dhe, nga ana tjet\u00ebr, m\u00eb pak ose aspak<\/span>
\nkufizuese e t\u00eb drejtave t\u00eb student\u00ebve. N\u00eb k\u00ebto kushte, Gjykata vler\u00ebson se masa e kund\u00ebrshtuar<\/span>
\nplot\u00ebson edhe k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e t\u00eb qenit e domosdoshme.<\/span>
\n68. P\u00ebr sa i p\u00ebrket n\u00ebnkriterit t\u00eb p\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb mas\u00ebs, Gjykata vler\u00ebson t\u00eb analizoj\u00eb<\/span>
\nn\u00ebse koh\u00ebzgjatja e mas\u00ebs s\u00eb pun\u00ebsimit t\u00eb detyruar plot\u00ebson k\u00ebt\u00eb kriter, pra n\u00ebse ajo pritet t\u00eb sjell\u00eb<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nefektin e duhur dhe t\u00eb realizoj\u00eb synimin p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilin \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrzgjedhur. Sipas dispozitave ligjore<\/span>
\nt\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuara, konkretisht nenit 4 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023, detyrimi shtrihet q\u00eb nga student\u00ebt e<\/span>
\nvitit t\u00eb par\u00eb t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb p\u00ebr nj\u00eb afat pes\u00ebvje\u00e7ar, i cili \u00ebsht\u00eb i pritsh\u00ebm t\u00eb zbatohet jo<\/span>
\nm\u00eb shpejt se viti 2029, kur ata p\u00ebrfundojn\u00eb ciklin e studimeve sipas programit m\u00ebsimor dhe t\u00eb<\/span>
\np\u00ebrfundoj\u00eb jo m\u00eb von\u00eb se viti 2034, kur ata shlyejn\u00eb detyrimin sipas marr\u00ebveshjes s\u00eb n\u00ebnshkruar<\/span>
\nme institucionin e sh\u00ebrbimit publik. P\u00ebr student\u00ebt e vitit t\u00eb pest\u00eb ose t\u00eb gjasht\u00eb q\u00eb pranojn\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\nn\u00ebnshkruajn\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjen e pun\u00ebsimit prioritar, zbatimi i k\u00ebsaj skeme \u00ebsht\u00eb e pritshme t\u00eb filloj\u00eb<\/span>
\njo m\u00eb shpejt se viti 2024, kurse p\u00ebr student\u00ebt e tjer\u00eb t\u00eb nd\u00ebrmjet\u00ebm, t\u00eb vitit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb deri n\u00eb vitin e<\/span>
\nkat\u00ebrt, ajo pritet t\u00eb zbatohet jo m\u00eb shpejt se viti 2026. Gjykata v\u00ebren se pavar\u00ebsisht se ligji ka<\/span>
\nefekt t\u00eb p\u00ebrkohsh\u00ebm, pasi sipas dispozit\u00ebs kalimtare (neni 9) ai i shtrin efektet n\u00eb periudh\u00ebn nga<\/span>
\nviti akademik 2023-2024 deri n\u00eb vitin akademik 2027-2028, duke marr\u00eb parasysh k\u00ebt\u00eb formul\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\nzbatimit t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj skeme, rezulton se masa e parashikuar nga ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi aktualisht prek pes\u00eb breza<\/span>
\nstudent\u00ebsh n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb plot\u00eb ose t\u00eb pjesshme, bazuar kjo n\u00eb vitin e studimeve n\u00eb t\u00eb cilin<\/span>
\nndodhen aktualisht dhe p\u00ebr nj\u00eb periudh\u00eb kohore t\u00eb gjat\u00eb, e cila, n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e Gjykat\u00ebs, nuk<\/span>
\n\u00ebsht\u00eb e p\u00ebrshtatshme n\u00eb lidhje me urgjenc\u00ebn e nd\u00ebrhyrjes legjislative n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb efekteve t\u00eb<\/span>
\npritshme t\u00eb saj. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, koh\u00ebzgjatja e mas\u00ebs s\u00eb pun\u00ebsimit sipas k\u00ebsaj skeme p\u00ebr periudh\u00ebn<\/span>
\npes\u00ebvje\u00e7are \u00ebsht\u00eb gati e barabart\u00eb me koh\u00ebzgjatjen e plot\u00eb t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb studimeve p\u00ebr programin e<\/span>
\nintegruar gjasht\u00ebvje\u00e7ar.<\/span>
\n69. Gjykata vler\u00ebson se subjektet e interesuara, edhe pse kishin barr\u00ebn e prov\u00ebs n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb<\/span>
\ndrejtim, nuk arrit\u00ebn t\u00eb provojn\u00eb se kjo mas\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb e p\u00ebrshtatshme, duke e lidhur at\u00eb me efektet e<\/span>
\npritshme aktuale q\u00eb kan\u00eb sjell\u00eb nevoj\u00ebn e nd\u00ebrhyrjes dhe me pasojat e saj n\u00eb koh\u00eb, n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb<\/span>
\nefekteve t\u00eb pritshme p\u00ebr t\u00eb ardhmen, pra se afati i koh\u00ebzgjatjes s\u00eb k\u00ebsaj mase, e p\u00ebrcaktuar n\u00eb<\/span>
\nvar\u00ebsi t\u00eb viteve t\u00eb studimit n\u00eb t\u00eb cilat ndodhen student\u00ebt e nd\u00ebrmjet\u00ebm ose ata q\u00eb kan\u00eb fituar t\u00eb<\/span>
\ndrejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb filluar studimet para hyrjes n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb ndryshimeve ligjore t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuara, \u00ebsht\u00eb<\/span>
\nmjeti m\u00eb i p\u00ebrshtatsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr t\u00eb siguruar nevojat e popullat\u00ebs p\u00ebr kujdes sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor. Gjykata m\u00eb<\/span>
\nsip\u00ebr ka konstatuar raportin e numrit t\u00eb mjek\u00ebve n\u00eb raport me popullat\u00ebn, raport ky q\u00eb u vler\u00ebsua<\/span>
\nse krijon v\u00ebshtir\u00ebsi n\u00eb sigurimin e skem\u00ebs s\u00eb kujdesit sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor dhe garantimin e t\u00eb drejtave t\u00eb<\/span>
\nshtetasve p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrfituar k\u00ebt\u00eb kujdes nga shteti n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb barabart\u00eb. Gjat\u00eb k\u00ebtij gjykimi<\/span>
\nrezultoi, gjithashtu, se ka pasur rritje graduale t\u00eb numrit t\u00eb kuotave t\u00eb \u00e7elura p\u00ebr \u00e7do vit p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nprogramin e studimit \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e p\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb UMT, duke arritur rreth 500 t\u00eb tilla brenda<\/span>
\nvitit 2024. Edhe sipas vendimit nr. 17, dat\u00eb 10.03.2023 t\u00eb senatit akademik t\u00eb UMT-s\u00eb, numri i<\/span>
\nkuotave t\u00eb pranimit p\u00ebr vitin akademik 2023-2024 n\u00eb fakultetin \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e p\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d,<\/span>
\nprogrami \u201cMaster i Shkencave\u201d, \u00ebsht\u00eb 464. Referuar fakteve t\u00eb rezultuara gjat\u00eb k\u00ebtij gjykimi,<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nprurjet nga UMT-ja p\u00ebr mjek\u00eb t\u00eb diplomuar vit pas viti, n\u00eb periudh\u00ebn q\u00eb shtrihen efektet e k\u00ebtij<\/span>
\nligji, jan\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb m\u00ebdha se nevojat aktuale p\u00ebr t\u00eb pun\u00ebsuar mjek\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm n\u00eb vendet<\/span>
\nvakante, t\u00eb cilat mund t\u00eb plot\u00ebsohen nga student\u00ebt e diplomuar p\u00ebraf\u00ebrsisht brenda dy-tre vjet\u00ebve.<\/span>
\nPavar\u00ebsisht k\u00ebtyre masave q\u00eb jan\u00eb duke u marr\u00eb dhe q\u00eb synojn\u00eb t\u00eb sigurojn\u00eb q\u00ebllimin e<\/span>
\nligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsit t\u00eb evidentuar m\u00eb sip\u00ebr, subjektet e interesuara nuk kan\u00eb arritur t\u00eb justifikojn\u00eb se n\u00eb<\/span>
\n\u00e7far\u00eb m\u00ebnyre lidhja e marr\u00ebveshjeve dhe mbajtja e diplom\u00ebs deri n\u00eb \u201cshlyerjen e detyrimeve p\u00ebr<\/span>
\npun\u00ebsim\u201d, sipas afateve ligjore, p\u00ebr student\u00ebt q\u00eb p\u00ebrfundojn\u00eb studimet n\u00eb Fakultetin e Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb<\/span>
\ndo t\u00eb sjell\u00eb efektin e d\u00ebshiruar, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb kur numri i vendeve vakante n\u00eb sistemin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor<\/span>
\n\u00ebsht\u00eb 1000, nd\u00ebrsa numri i kuotave p\u00ebr student\u00eb n\u00eb Fakultetin e Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb rreth 500 n\u00eb vit.<\/span>
\n70. Po k\u00ebshtu, Gjykata v\u00ebren se praktika e pun\u00ebsimit t\u00eb mjek\u00ebve brenda vendit p\u00ebr nevoja<\/span>
\nt\u00eb tij \u00ebsht\u00eb zbatuar p\u00ebr periudha t\u00eb p\u00ebrkohshme, n\u00eb m\u00ebnyra t\u00eb ngjashme, edhe n\u00eb vende t\u00eb tjera, si<\/span>
\nSuedia, Spanja, Danimarka, Kazakistani ose Afrika e Jugut, por n\u00eb ndryshim nga parashikimet e<\/span>
\nnenit 4 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023, afati nuk rezulton t\u00eb ket\u00eb tejkaluar gjysm\u00ebn e koh\u00ebzgjatjes s\u00eb<\/span>
\nstudimeve. N\u00eb ndryshim nga k\u00ebto raste t\u00eb ngjashme, raporti n\u00eb rastin e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb rezulton t\u00eb<\/span>
\njet\u00eb, duke iu referuar afatit pes\u00ebvje\u00e7ar t\u00eb pun\u00ebsimit n\u00eb raport me gjasht\u00eb vjet\u00ebt e studimit, n\u00eb<\/span>
\nmas\u00ebn 83%.<\/span>
\n71. P\u00ebr sa m\u00eb sip\u00ebr, Gjykata vler\u00ebson se dispozitat e kund\u00ebrshtuara, konkretisht<\/span>
\nparashikimet e nenit 4 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023, n\u00eb pjes\u00ebn q\u00eb parashikojn\u00eb afatet p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim pas<\/span>
\np\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb studimeve, sjellin kufizim t\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs kushtetuese t\u00eb student\u00ebve p\u00ebr t\u00eb zgjedhur<\/span>
\nvendin e pun\u00ebs, t\u00eb garantuar nga neni 49, pika 1, i Kushtetut\u00ebs. N\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb testit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nproporcionalitetit, skema e zgjedhur \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00eb e ashp\u00ebr sesa ishte e nevojshme p\u00ebr arritjen e<\/span>
\nq\u00ebllimit t\u00eb synuar n\u00eb raport me rrethanat q\u00eb e kan\u00eb diktuar at\u00eb. Detyrimi i student\u00ebve p\u00ebr t\u00eb<\/span>
\nzgjedhur mes n\u00ebnshkrimit ose jo t\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjes, me pasoj\u00ebn q\u00eb n\u00eb rast t\u00eb n\u00ebnshkrimit diploma<\/span>
\nkalohet zyrtarisht n\u00eb institucionin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor ku pun\u00ebsohen deri n\u00eb \u201cshlyerjen e detyrimeve p\u00ebr<\/span>
\npun\u00ebsim\u201d ka \u00e7uar n\u00eb mohim t\u00ebr\u00ebsor t\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u00eb zgjedhur vendin e pun\u00ebs, sipas kushteve<\/span>
\ndhe kritereve me t\u00eb cilat student\u00ebt jan\u00eb njohur dhe i kan\u00eb pranuar n\u00eb momentin q\u00eb kan\u00eb nisur<\/span>
\nstudimet apo kan\u00eb konkurruar p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb q\u00ebllim.<\/span>
\n72. Duke u nisur nga premisa q\u00eb afatet e p\u00ebrcaktuara nga neni 4 i ligjit nr. 60\/2023 nuk<\/span>
\njan\u00eb proporcionale, si dhe duke pasur parasysh se afati pes\u00ebvje\u00e7ar i parashikuar n\u00eb pik\u00ebn 1,<\/span>
\nshkronjat \u201cb\u201d dhe \u201cc\u201d t\u00eb k\u00ebtij neni \u00ebsht\u00eb gati i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb me vet\u00eb koh\u00ebzgjatjen e studimeve, ashtu<\/span>
\nedhe duke marr\u00eb n\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb eksperiencat e ngjashme t\u00eb vendeve t\u00eb tjera, Gjykata vler\u00ebson t\u00eb<\/span>
\nrishikohet ky afat deri n\u00eb nj\u00eb kufi jo m\u00eb t\u00eb gjat\u00eb sesa tre vjet. Po k\u00ebshtu, ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi duhet t\u00eb<\/span>
\nrishikoj\u00eb me q\u00ebllim q\u00eb t\u00eb garantoj\u00eb parimin e proporcionalitetit t\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrjes edhe afatet e tjera<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\ntre dhe dyvje\u00e7are t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuara respektivisht n\u00eb pik\u00ebn 2, shkronjat \u201ca\u201d dhe \u201cb\u201d dhe pik\u00ebn 3,<\/span>
\nshkronjat \u201ca\u201d dhe \u201cb\u201d t\u00eb nenit 4 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023.<\/span>
\n73. Sipas nenit 48 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 8577\/2000, kur ka lidhje midis objektit t\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs dhe<\/span>
\nakteve t\u00eb tjera normative vendos p\u00ebr \u00e7do rast Gjykata. N\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj dispozite, Gjykata<\/span>
\nvler\u00ebson se, n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb testit t\u00eb proporcionalitetit, cenimi i t\u00eb drejtave kushtetuese t\u00eb garantuara<\/span>
\nnga nenet 49, pika 1, dhe 57 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs vjen edhe p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb munges\u00ebs s\u00eb parashikimeve<\/span>
\nligjore n\u00eb nenin 6 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023, n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb: (i) kritereve objektive t\u00eb pun\u00ebsimit me<\/span>
\nprioritet, (ii) trajtimit financiar n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb sigurimit t\u00eb mjeteve t\u00eb nevojshme t\u00eb jetes\u00ebs, sipas<\/span>
\nnenit 49, pika 1, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, (iii) p\u00ebrllogaritjes s\u00eb pages\u00ebs s\u00eb periudh\u00ebs n\u00eb pritje n\u00eb<\/span>
\nkoh\u00ebzgjatjen e detyrimit p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim, n\u00ebse shteti nuk iu siguron vend pune student\u00ebve, sepse ata<\/span>
\ngjat\u00eb vitit t\u00eb par\u00eb t\u00eb pritjes nuk kan\u00eb mund\u00ebsi pun\u00ebsimi tjet\u00ebr, meqen\u00ebse nuk e disponojn\u00eb ende<\/span>
\ndiplom\u00ebn dhe, p\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, d\u00ebmtohen nga masa e parashikuar.<\/span>
\n74. Gjykata ka theksuar domosdoshm\u00ebrin\u00eb q\u00eb paraqet p\u00ebr funksionimin e shtetit t\u00eb s\u00eb<\/span>
\ndrejt\u00ebs shmangia e boshll\u00ebkut ligjor, por edhe funksionin e saj si ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebs negativ p\u00ebr garantimin<\/span>
\ne kushtetutshm\u00ebris\u00eb, e cila n\u00eb respektim t\u00eb parimit t\u00eb ndarjes dhe balancimit t\u00eb pushteteve nuk<\/span>
\nmund t\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyj\u00eb n\u00eb kompetencat e ligjb\u00ebr\u00ebsit p\u00ebr t\u00eb normuar rregullimin e drejt\u00eb t\u00eb dispozitave<\/span>
\nligjore (shih vendimet nr. 4, dat\u00eb 15.02.2021; nr. 31, dat\u00eb 19.11.2003 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese).<\/span>
\nN\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 76, pika 5, t\u00eb ligjit nr. 8577\/2000, duke qen\u00eb se mungesa e parashikimeve t\u00eb<\/span>
\nm\u00ebsip\u00ebrme p\u00ebrb\u00ebn boshll\u00ebk ligjor, si pasoj\u00eb e t\u00eb cilit kan\u00eb ardhur pasoja negative n\u00eb t\u00eb drejtat<\/span>
\nthemelore t\u00eb student\u00ebve t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb, Gjykata vler\u00ebson se ato duhet t\u00eb plot\u00ebsohen<\/span>
\nnga ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me arsyetimin e k\u00ebtij vendimi, duke p\u00ebrcaktuar ai vet\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjet dhe<\/span>
\nparimet q\u00eb duhet t\u00eb zbatohen n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast, brenda nj\u00eb afati q\u00eb konsiderohet t\u00eb caktohet tre muaj<\/span>
\nnga hyrja n\u00eb fuqi e vendimit.<\/span>
\n75. P\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, deri n\u00eb miratimin e rregullimeve t\u00eb reja ligjore nga ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi n\u00ebnshkrimi<\/span>
\ni marr\u00ebveshjes s\u00eb parashikuar n\u00eb nenin 4, pika 1, shkronja \u201cc\u201d, pika 2, shkronja \u201cb\u201d dhe pika 3<\/span>
\nshkronja \u201cb\u201d, t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023 nuk mund t\u00eb realizohet deri n\u00eb momentin e hyrjes n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb<\/span>
\nafateve t\u00eb reja ligjore, t\u00eb cilat duhet t\u00eb respektojn\u00eb kriteret e nenit 17 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs.<\/span>
\n76. N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, Gjykata vler\u00ebson se pretendimet e k\u00ebrkuesve p\u00ebr cenimin e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs<\/span>
\np\u00ebr arsimim, t\u00eb garantuar nga neni 57 i Kushtetut\u00ebs t\u00eb lidhur me parimin e siguris\u00eb juridike, si<\/span>
\ndhe p\u00ebr cenimin e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u00eb zgjedhur vet\u00eb vendin e pun\u00ebs, t\u00eb garantuar nga neni 49, pika 1,<\/span>
\ni Kushtetut\u00ebs, jan\u00eb pjes\u00ebrisht t\u00eb bazuara, sipas arsyetimit t\u00eb m\u00ebsip\u00ebrm t\u00eb k\u00ebtij vendimi, ndaj<\/span>
\nk\u00ebrkesa pranohet pjes\u00ebrisht.<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nP\u00cbR K\u00cbTO ARSYE,<\/span>
\nGjykata Kushtetuese e Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb, n\u00eb mb\u00ebshtetje t\u00eb neneve 131, pika 1,<\/span>
\nshkronja \u201ca\u201d dhe 134, pikat 1, shkronjat \u201cc\u201d dhe \u201ci\u201d dhe 2, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, si dhe neneve 72 dhe<\/span>
\n76, pika 5, t\u00eb ligjit nr. 8577, dat\u00eb 10.02.2000 \u201cP\u00ebr organizimin dhe funksionimin e Gjykat\u00ebs<\/span>
\nKushtetuese t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb\u201d, t\u00eb ndryshuar, me shumic\u00eb votash,<\/span>
\nV E N D O S I:<\/span>
\n1. Pranimin pjes\u00ebrisht t\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs.<\/span>
\n2. Shfuqizimin e fjal\u00ebve \u201c5 (pes\u00eb) vjet\u201d n\u00eb nenin 4, pika 1, shkronja \u201cb\u201d, \u201c5-vje\u00e7ar\u201d n\u00eb nenin<\/span>
\n4, pika 1, shkronja \u201cc\u201d, \u201c3 (tre) vjet\u201d n\u00eb nenin 4, pika 2, shkronja \u201ca\u201d, \u201c3-vje\u00e7ar\u201d n\u00eb nenin<\/span>
\n4, pika 2, shkronja \u201cb\u201d, \u201c2 (dy) vjet\u201d n\u00eb nenin 4, pika 3, shkronja \u201ca\u201d, \u201c2-vje\u00e7ar\u201d n\u00eb<\/span>
\nnenin 4, pika 3, shkronja \u201cb\u201d, t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023 \u201cP\u00ebr trajtimin e ve\u00e7ant\u00eb t\u00eb student\u00ebve<\/span>
\nq\u00eb ndjekin programin e integruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e p\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb<\/span>
\ninstitucionet publike t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb\u201d.<\/span>
\n3. Konstatimin e ometimit ligjor n\u00eb nenin 6 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023 \u201cP\u00ebr trajtimin e ve\u00e7ant\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\nstudent\u00ebve q\u00eb ndjekin programin e integruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e<\/span>
\np\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb institucionet publike t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb\u201d, lidhur me munges\u00ebn e kritereve<\/span>
\nobjektive t\u00eb pun\u00ebsimit me prioritet, trajtimin financiar n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb sigurimit t\u00eb mjeteve t\u00eb<\/span>
\nnevojshme t\u00eb jetes\u00ebs, si dhe p\u00ebrllogaritjen e pages\u00ebs s\u00eb periudh\u00ebs n\u00eb pritje n\u00eb<\/span>
\nkoh\u00ebzgjatjen e detyrimit p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim.<\/span>
\n4. Detyrimin e Kuvendit t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb q\u00eb t\u00eb miratoj\u00eb ndryshimet e nevojshme<\/span>
\nligjore brenda 3 (tre) muajve nga hyrja n\u00eb fuqi e k\u00ebtij vendimi.<\/span>
\n5. Heqjen e mas\u00ebs s\u00eb pezullimit t\u00eb zbatimit t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023 \u201cP\u00ebr trajtimin e ve\u00e7ant\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\nstudent\u00ebve q\u00eb ndjekin programin e integruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e<\/span>
\np\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb institucionet publike t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb\u201d.<\/span>
\nKy vendim \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimtar dhe hyn n\u00eb fuqi dit\u00ebn e botimit n\u00eb Fletoren Zyrtare.<\/span>
\nMarr\u00eb m\u00eb 25.01.2024<\/span>
\nShpallur m\u00eb 26.02.2024<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nMendim pjes\u00ebrisht kund\u00ebr<\/span>
\n1. N\u00eb gjykimin kushtetues t\u00eb v\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb l\u00ebvizje nga k\u00ebrkuesit, 30 deputet\u00eb t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo<\/span>
\nm\u00eb pak se 1\/5-ta e deputet\u00ebve) dhe 37 student\u00eb t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb Tiran\u00ebs (UMT), me objekt shfuqizimin e disa dispozitave t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023 \u201cP\u00ebr<\/span>
\ntrajtimin e ve\u00e7ant\u00eb t\u00eb student\u00ebve q\u00eb ndjekin programin e integruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb<\/span>
\n\u201cMjek\u00ebsi e P\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb institucionet publike t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb\u201d, jam pjes\u00ebrisht kund\u00ebr<\/span>
\nq\u00ebndrimit t\u00eb shumic\u00ebs, pasi vler\u00ebsoj se k\u00ebrkesa duhej t\u00eb ishte pranuar t\u00ebr\u00ebsisht. N\u00eb mb\u00ebshtetje t\u00eb<\/span>
\nnenit 132, pika 3, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs dhe nenit 72, pika 8, t\u00eb ligjit nr. 8577\/2000, q\u00eb parashikojn\u00eb<\/span>
\npublikimin e mendimit t\u00eb pakic\u00ebs s\u00eb bashku me vendimin p\u00ebrfundimtar t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs, parashtroj n\u00eb<\/span>
\nvijim argumentet q\u00eb mb\u00ebshtesin q\u00ebndrimin tim.<\/span>
\n2. Ligji nr. 60\/2023 ka p\u00ebr q\u00ebllim sigurimin e burimeve njer\u00ebzore, profesionist\u00ebve n\u00eb<\/span>
\ninstitucionet e sh\u00ebrbimit sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor n\u00eb vend n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet p\u00ebrcaktimit t\u00eb rregullave p\u00ebr trajtimin e<\/span>
\nve\u00e7ant\u00eb t\u00eb student\u00ebve q\u00eb ndjekin programin e integruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e<\/span>
\np\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb institucionet publike t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb (neni 2), por edhe rritjen e interesit t\u00eb<\/span>
\ntyre p\u00ebr t\u00eb punuar n\u00eb sektorin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor publik si pjes\u00eb e rritjes s\u00eb investimeve n\u00eb sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsi.<\/span>
\nN\u00eb funksion t\u00eb k\u00ebtij q\u00ebllimi, ai u ofron k\u00ebtyre student\u00ebve trajtim t\u00eb ve\u00e7ant\u00eb, n\u00eb aspektet e<\/span>
\npun\u00ebsimit me prioritet pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb studimeve dhe t\u00eb p\u00ebrfitimit nga programet sociale t\u00eb<\/span>
\nstrehimit (neni 3, pika 1).<\/span>
\n3. K\u00ebrkuesit kan\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuar nenin 4, pikat 1, shkronja \u201cc\u201d, 2, shkronja \u201cb\u201d, 3,<\/span>
\nshkronja \u201cb\u201d, si dhe nenin 5, fjalia e par\u00eb, t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023. Neni 4 parashikon se trajtim t\u00eb<\/span>
\nve\u00e7ant\u00eb p\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb: (i) kandidati q\u00eb pranohet n\u00eb programin e integruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb<\/span>
\n\u201cMjek\u00ebsi e p\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb institucionet publike t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb (pika 1, shkronja \u201cc\u201d); (ii)<\/span>
\nstudenti i vitit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb deri n\u00eb vitin e kat\u00ebrt akademik (pika 2, shkronja \u201cb\u201d); (iii) studenti i vitit t\u00eb<\/span>
\npest\u00eb ose t\u00eb gjasht\u00eb n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb program (pika 3, shkronja \u201cb\u201d), kur pranojn\u00eb kalimin zyrtarisht t\u00eb<\/span>
\ndiplom\u00ebs p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb nga institucioni publik i arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb, ku ka p\u00ebrfunduar<\/span>
\nstudimet, n\u00eb institucionin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor ku pun\u00ebsohet, deri n\u00eb shlyerjen e detyrimeve p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim,<\/span>
\nsipas afateve, p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsisht 5-vje\u00e7ar, 3-vje\u00e7ar dhe 2-vje\u00e7ar, me t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn q\u00eb pas p\u00ebrmbushjes s\u00eb<\/span>
\ndetyrimit t\u00eb pun\u00ebsimit kandidati t\u00eb t\u00ebrheq\u00eb diplom\u00ebn universitare. Nd\u00ebrsa neni 5 parashikon se<\/span>
\nstudenti q\u00eb nuk pranon t\u00eb n\u00ebnshkruaj\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjen p\u00ebr t\u00eb punuar n\u00eb nj\u00eb institucion sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor<\/span>
\nn\u00eb vend, publik ose privat, nga data e lindjes t\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim me ministrin\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebse<\/span>
\np\u00ebr arsimin, ministrin\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebse p\u00ebr sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsin\u00eb dhe institucionin e arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb publik,<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nsipas p\u00ebrcaktimeve t\u00eb pikave 2 dhe 3 t\u00eb nenit 4 t\u00eb k\u00ebtij ligji, paguan vler\u00ebn e plot\u00eb t\u00eb kostos s\u00eb<\/span>
\nstudimeve (fjalia e par\u00eb).<\/span>
\n4. N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim t\u00eb gjykimit, shumica ka vendosur t\u00eb shfuqizoj\u00eb vet\u00ebm afatet prej pes\u00eb,<\/span>
\ntre dhe dy vjet t\u00eb detyrimit p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim, t\u00eb parashikuara respektivisht n\u00eb nenin 4, pikat 1,<\/span>
\nshkronjat \u201cb\u201d dhe \u201cc\u201d, 2, shkronjat \u201ca\u201d dhe \u201cb\u201d, si dhe 3, shkronjat \u201ca\u201d dhe \u201cb\u201d, t\u00eb ligjit nr.<\/span>
\n60\/2023, me arsyetimin se ato kufizojn\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e student\u00ebve p\u00ebr t\u00eb zgjedhur dhe pranuar<\/span>
\nvendin e pun\u00ebs, t\u00eb garantuar nga neni 49, pika 1, i Kushtetut\u00ebs. Sipas shumic\u00ebs, ndon\u00ebse<\/span>
\nnd\u00ebrhyrja \u00ebsht\u00eb vendosur me ligj dhe ka interes publik, ajo nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb proporcionale, pasi skema e<\/span>
\nzgjedhur \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00eb e ashp\u00ebr sesa ishte e nevojshme p\u00ebr arritjen e q\u00ebllimit t\u00eb synuar n\u00eb raport me<\/span>
\nrrethanat q\u00eb e kan\u00eb diktuar at\u00eb (shih paragraf\u00ebt 57, 59, 61 dhe 71 t\u00eb vendimit).<\/span>
\n5. Nuk pajtohem me k\u00ebt\u00eb q\u00ebndrim t\u00eb shumic\u00ebs, pasi ajo, n\u00eb thelb, pranon se skema<\/span>
\nligjore e zgjedhur e pun\u00ebsimit me prioritet \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me Kushtetut\u00ebn, por i duhet<\/span>
\nmodifikuar vet\u00ebm koh\u00ebzgjatja e detyrimit p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim, duke e shkurtuar at\u00eb (shih paragrafin 72<\/span>
\ndhe 76 t\u00eb vendimit). P\u00ebrkund\u00ebr k\u00ebtij q\u00ebndrimi, vler\u00ebsoj se, n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsi, mekanizmi ligjor i pun\u00ebsimit<\/span>
\nme prioritet t\u00eb studentit q\u00eb ndjek programin e integruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb p\u00ebr mjek\u00ebsi n\u00eb<\/span>
\ninstitucionet publike, nuk respekton parimin e proporcionalitetit t\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrjes q\u00eb ai b\u00ebn n\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\ndrejtat themelore p\u00ebr t\u00eb zgjedhur ose pranuar vet\u00eb vendin e pun\u00ebs dhe p\u00ebr arsimim, t\u00eb garantuara<\/span>
\nnga nenet 49, pika 1 dhe 57, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs.<\/span>
\n6. P\u00ebr sa i takon vler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb parimit t\u00eb propocionalitetit n\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrjet q\u00eb kufizojn\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\ndrejtat dhe lirit\u00eb themelore, Gjykata ka zhvilluar disa kritere: (i) n\u00ebse objektivi i ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsit \u00ebsht\u00eb<\/span>
\nmjaftueshm\u00ebrisht i r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm p\u00ebr t\u00eb justifikuar kufizimin e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs; (ii) n\u00ebse masat e marra<\/span>
\njan\u00eb t\u00eb lidhura n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb arsyeshme me objektivin, ato nuk mund t\u00eb jen\u00eb arbitrare, t\u00eb padrejta<\/span>
\nose t\u00eb bazuara mbi vler\u00ebsime alogjike; (iii) n\u00ebse mjetet e p\u00ebrdorura nuk jan\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb ashpra se sa<\/span>
\nduhet p\u00ebr t\u00eb arritur objektivin e k\u00ebrkuar \u2013 sa m\u00eb t\u00eb m\u00ebdha efektet e d\u00ebmshme t\u00eb mas\u00ebs s\u00eb<\/span>
\np\u00ebrzgjedhur, aq m\u00eb tep\u00ebr duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb i r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm objektivi p\u00ebr t\u2019u arritur, n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb masa<\/span>
\nt\u00eb justifikohet si e nevojshme. Proporcionaliteti i nj\u00eb kufizimi vler\u00ebsohet rast pas rasti, duke<\/span>
\npasur parasysh q\u00eb kriteret e m\u00ebsip\u00ebrme t\u00eb mos analizohen ve\u00e7 e ve\u00e7, por t\u00eb g\u00ebrshetuara me nj\u00ebratjetr\u00ebn (shih vendimet nr. 21, dat\u00eb 18.04.2023; nr. 20, dat\u00eb 20.04.2021; nr. 33, dat\u00eb 08.06.2016<\/span>
\nt\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese).<\/span>
\n7. Gjat\u00eb gjykimit kushtetues t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes ka rezultuar se ligji nr. 60\/2023 \u00ebsht\u00eb miratuar<\/span>
\np\u00ebr t\u00eb garantuar ofrimin e kujdesit sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor. Ky i fundit p\u00ebrb\u00ebn jo vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb objektiv social t\u00eb<\/span>
\nparashikuar nga neni 59, pika 1, shkronja \u201cc\u201d, i Kushtetut\u00ebs, por edhe nj\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00eb themelore t\u00eb<\/span>
\ngarantuar nga neni 55 i saj. Subjektet e interesuara, Kuvendi dhe K\u00ebshilli i Ministrave, kan\u00eb<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nparashtruar se ligji u p\u00ebrgjigjet nevojave t\u00eb diktuara n\u00eb vend lidhur me mungesat e burimeve<\/span>
\nnjer\u00ebzore, sfidave p\u00ebr t\u2019i mbajtur burimet ekzistuese n\u00eb qendrat sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore, si dhe p\u00ebr t\u00eb<\/span>
\nmotivuar profesionist\u00ebt e sh\u00ebndetit p\u00ebr t\u00eb vazhduar pun\u00ebn n\u00eb Shqip\u00ebri, me q\u00ebllim garantimin e<\/span>
\nsh\u00ebrbimit mjek\u00ebsor p\u00ebr popullsin\u00eb. K\u00ebshilli i Ministrave, n\u00eb seanc\u00ebn plenare t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 21.12.2023,<\/span>
\nka deklaruar se p\u00ebr 4 vjet\u00ebt e ardhshme \u00ebsht\u00eb e pritshme t\u00eb jen\u00eb rreth 1000 pozicione vakante n\u00eb<\/span>
\nsektorin e sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsis\u00eb.<\/span>
\n8. N\u00eb k\u00ebto rrethana dhe bazuar n\u00eb kriteret e zhvilluara nga jurisprudenca kushtetuese,<\/span>
\n\u00e7\u00ebshtja q\u00eb shtrohej p\u00ebr zgjidhje p\u00ebrpara Gjykat\u00ebs ishte analiza e kujdesshme e situat\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u00eb<\/span>
\nidentifikuar p\u00ebrmas\u00ebn e nevoj\u00ebs p\u00ebr mjek\u00eb t\u00eb rinj q\u00eb duhet t\u00eb ushtrojn\u00eb profesionin n\u00eb Shqip\u00ebri,<\/span>
\nlogjik\u00ebn dhe ndershm\u00ebrin\u00eb e mekanizmit ligjor \u201cmarr\u00ebveshje p\u00ebrpara pranimit n\u00eb programin e<\/span>
\nstudimit p\u00ebr t\u00eb ushtruar profesionin n\u00eb Shqip\u00ebri dhe n\u00eb rast mospranimi, me sanksion pagimin e<\/span>
\nkostos s\u00eb plot\u00eb t\u00eb studimeve n\u00eb arsimin publik\u201d, si dhe ashp\u00ebrsin\u00eb e k\u00ebtij mekanizmi.<\/span>
\n9. Fillimisht duhet evidentuar se, si\u00e7 sh\u00ebnohet n\u00eb relacionin shoq\u00ebrues, nisma p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nmiratimin e ligjit \u00ebsht\u00eb nd\u00ebrmarr\u00eb nga K\u00ebshilli i Ministrave pa qen\u00eb pjes\u00eb e programit vjetor<\/span>
\nanalitik t\u00eb projektakteve p\u00ebr vitin 2023, t\u00eb miratuar me vendimin e dat\u00ebs 27.12.2022. Programi<\/span>
\nvjetor i projektakteve \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb prej instrumenteve t\u00eb parashikuar nga legjislacioni n\u00eb fuqi (shih<\/span>
\nnenin 27 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 9000, dat\u00eb 30.01.2003 \u201cP\u00ebr organizimin dhe funksionimin e K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMinistrave\u201d dhe pikat 2, shkronja \u201c\u00e7\u201d, 7, 8, 9 dhe 10 t\u00eb rregullores s\u00eb miratuar me vendimin nr.<\/span>
\n584, dat\u00eb 28.08.2003, t\u00eb ndryshuar), bazuar n\u00eb rolin kushtetues t\u00eb K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Ministrave p\u00ebr t\u00eb<\/span>
\np\u00ebrcaktuar drejtimet e p\u00ebrgjithshme t\u00eb politik\u00ebs shtet\u00ebrore (neni 100 i Kushtetut\u00ebs). Nga ana<\/span>
\ntjet\u00ebr, n\u00eb relacionin shoq\u00ebrues t\u00eb projektligjit \u00ebsht\u00eb sh\u00ebnuar se nisma \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me<\/span>
\nprogramin politik t\u00eb K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Ministrave t\u00eb miratuar me vendimin nr. 68\/2021, dat\u00eb<\/span>
\n17.09.2021 t\u00eb Kuvendit, si dhe me disa strategji komb\u00ebtare, sikurse ajo p\u00ebr zhvillim dhe integrim<\/span>
\n(2022 \u2013 2030), e arsimit (2021 \u2013 2026), si dhe e sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsis\u00eb (2021-2030). Megjithat\u00eb, n\u00eb asnj\u00eb<\/span>
\nprej k\u00ebtyre dokumenteve programore dhe strategjike nuk rezulton t\u00eb jet\u00eb parashikuar nj\u00eb nism\u00eb e<\/span>
\ntill\u00eb ligjore, por ato p\u00ebrmbajn\u00eb vet\u00ebm angazhime t\u00eb p\u00ebrgjithshme p\u00ebr p\u00ebrmir\u00ebsimin e burimeve<\/span>
\nnjer\u00ebzore me q\u00ebllim ofrimin e sh\u00ebrbimeve cil\u00ebsore.<\/span>
\n10. N\u00eb vijim, K\u00ebshilli i Ministrave, bazuar n\u00eb nenin 83, pika 2, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs i ka<\/span>
\npropozuar Kuvendit q\u00eb shqyrtimi dhe miratimi i projektligjit t\u00eb b\u00ebhet me procedur\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\np\u00ebrshpejtuar, p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb nevoj\u00ebs emergjente q\u00eb ai paraqet p\u00ebr miratimin dhe hyrjen n\u00eb fuqi,<\/span>
\np\u00ebrpara fillimit t\u00eb procedurave p\u00ebr aplikimin dhe regjistrimin e kandidat\u00ebve p\u00ebr student\u00eb n\u00eb<\/span>
\nfush\u00ebn e mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb p\u00ebr vitin akademik 2023-2024 (shih faqen 11 t\u00eb relacionit shoq\u00ebrues t\u00eb<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nprojektligjit). Mbi baz\u00ebn e k\u00ebtij propozimi Kuvendi ka miratuar ligjin nr. 60\/2023 me procedur\u00eb<\/span>
\nt\u00eb p\u00ebrshpejtuar parlamentare n\u00eb seanc\u00ebn plenare t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 21.07.2023.<\/span>
\n11. P\u00ebr sa m\u00eb lart, kjo nism\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb n\u00eb kalendar pa planifikim, si dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb<\/span>
\nhartuar dhe miratuar me urgjenc\u00eb. Kjo do t\u00eb thot\u00eb se ka munguar vler\u00ebsimi logjik dhe analiza e<\/span>
\np\u00ebrshtatshme e nevoj\u00ebs faktike \u2013 p\u00ebrmasa e largimit t\u00eb profesionist\u00ebve t\u00eb fush\u00ebs s\u00eb mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb<\/span>
\njasht\u00eb vendit, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb k\u00ebtu edhe ndikimin q\u00eb mund t\u00eb ket\u00eb n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb nevoj\u00eb numri i mjek\u00ebve t\u00eb<\/span>
\ndiplomuar n\u00eb institucionet e arsimit privat q\u00eb operojn\u00eb n\u00eb vend, si dhe mund\u00ebsia e p\u00ebrdorimit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nalternativave t\u00eb tjera m\u00eb pak kufizuese p\u00ebr t\u2019iu p\u00ebrgjigjur nevoj\u00ebs faktike.<\/span>
\n12. Ligji nr. 60\/2023 i shtrin efektet n\u00eb periudh\u00ebn nga viti akademik 2023-2024 deri n\u00eb<\/span>
\nvitin akademik 2027 \u2013 2028 (neni 9), pra p\u00ebrmes tij preken 10 breza student\u00ebsh, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt<\/span>
\ndetyrohen t\u00eb ushtrojn\u00eb profesionin n\u00eb Shqip\u00ebri pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb studimeve. B\u00ebhet fjal\u00eb p\u00ebr 5<\/span>
\nbreza t\u00eb plot\u00eb student\u00ebsh me nga 6 vjet, p\u00ebr aq sa \u00ebsht\u00eb koh\u00ebzgjatja e plot\u00eb e ciklit t\u00eb studimeve<\/span>
\np\u00ebr programin e integruar t\u00eb studimit \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e P\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d, nd\u00ebrsa 5 breza student\u00ebsh<\/span>
\npreken pjes\u00ebrisht sipas vitit n\u00eb t\u00eb cilin ndodhen aktualisht deri n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin e programit (shih<\/span>
\nparagrafin e dyt\u00eb t\u00eb pik\u00ebs 5 t\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigjes s\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb me shkrim nga K\u00ebshilli i Ministrave me<\/span>
\nshkres\u00ebn e dat\u00ebs 05.01.2024). N\u00eb kontekst t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbajtjes dhe q\u00ebllimit t\u00eb ligjit \u00ebsht\u00eb e qart\u00eb q\u00eb<\/span>
\nkategoria e individ\u00ebve q\u00eb preken p\u00ebrfshin student\u00ebt dhe mjek\u00ebt e rinj q\u00eb jan\u00eb n\u00eb profesion deri 5<\/span>
\nvjet pas diplomimit.<\/span>
\n13. Gjat\u00eb gjykimit kushtetues ka rezultuar se n\u00eb sistemin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor ofrojn\u00eb sh\u00ebrbim<\/span>
\n5400 mjek\u00eb, q\u00eb n\u00ebnkupton 1.93 mjek\u00eb p\u00ebr \u00e7do 1000 banor\u00eb (shih faqen 6, paragrafi i tret\u00eb, t\u00eb<\/span>
\nrelacionit shoq\u00ebrues t\u00eb projektligjit). Aktualisht, sistemi sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor ka 4 % pozicione vakante<\/span>
\n(482) mjek\u00eb, 213 mjek\u00eb jan\u00eb n\u00eb mosh\u00eb pensioni, nd\u00ebrsa \u00e7do vit largohen jasht\u00eb vendit rreth 200<\/span>
\nmjek\u00eb (shih pik\u00ebn 1 t\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigjes s\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb me shkrim nga K\u00ebshilli i Ministrave me shkres\u00ebn e<\/span>
\ndat\u00ebs 05.01.2024). P\u00ebr sa i takon mosh\u00ebs s\u00eb mjek\u00ebve q\u00eb largohen jasht\u00eb vendit dhe llojit t\u00eb<\/span>
\narsimit t\u00eb ndjekur prej tyre (publik ose privat), n\u00eb gjykim nuk u paraqit\u00ebn t\u00eb dh\u00ebna. Nga ana<\/span>
\ntjet\u00ebr, p\u00ebr t\u2019iu p\u00ebrgjigjur situat\u00ebs s\u00eb largimit t\u00eb mjek\u00ebve, n\u00eb Universitetin e Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb ka<\/span>
\npasur rritje graduale t\u00eb numrit t\u00eb kuotave t\u00eb \u00e7elura p\u00ebr \u00e7do vit p\u00ebr programin e studimit \u201cMjek\u00ebsi<\/span>
\ne P\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d, duke arritur n\u00eb 464 t\u00eb tilla brenda vitit 2024 (shih vendimin nr. 17, dat\u00eb<\/span>
\n10.03.2023 t\u00eb Senatit Akademik t\u00eb UMT-s\u00eb).<\/span>
\n14. Nga analiza e k\u00ebtyre t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave konstatohet leht\u00ebsisht se gjendja e burimeve<\/span>
\nnjer\u00ebzore n\u00eb sistemin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor nuk mund t\u00eb cil\u00ebsohet si nevoj\u00eb emergjente, si\u00e7 kan\u00eb<\/span>
\nparashtruar subjektet e interesuara. Duhet theksuar se fenomeni i largimit jasht\u00eb vendit i t\u00eb rinjve<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nt\u00eb mir\u00ebarsimuar dhe t\u00eb kualifikuar, i njohur edhe si ikja e trurit (brain drain), \u00ebsht\u00eb tep\u00ebr<\/span>
\nshqet\u00ebsues, por ai duket se ekziston n\u00eb t\u00eb gjith\u00eb rajonin e Ballkanit.1 Megjithat\u00eb, ky fenomen<\/span>
\nvendas dhe rajonal nuk mund t\u00eb thjeshtohet duke e adresuar at\u00eb si nj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje q\u00eb ka lidhje vet\u00ebm<\/span>
\nme sektorin e mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb ose vet\u00ebm me mjek\u00ebt q\u00eb studiojn\u00eb dhe diplomohen n\u00eb programet e<\/span>
\narsimit publik. Madje subjekti i interesuar, Kuvendi pohoi n\u00eb gjykim se tendenca dhe fryma q\u00eb<\/span>
\nmbizot\u00ebron tek t\u00eb rinjt\u00eb shqiptar\u00eb, pa p\u00ebrjashtuar edhe student\u00ebt e mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb, \u00ebsht\u00eb ajo e largimit<\/span>
\njasht\u00eb vendit. Po k\u00ebshtu, largimi i mjek\u00ebve t\u00eb sapodiplomuar jasht\u00eb vendit nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb situat\u00eb<\/span>
\nq\u00eb u krijua n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb beft\u00eb, q\u00eb t\u00eb gjente t\u00eb pap\u00ebrgatitura autoritetet politik\u00ebb\u00ebr\u00ebse dhe<\/span>
\nvendimmarr\u00ebse n\u00eb Shqip\u00ebri.<\/span>
\n15. N\u00eb k\u00ebndv\u00ebshtrim t\u00eb sa m\u00eb sip\u00ebr dhe duke mbajtur n\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb se Shqip\u00ebria \u00ebsht\u00eb<\/span>
\nnj\u00eb vend n\u00eb zhvillim, q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb prekur nga l\u00ebvizjet demografike t\u00eb popullsis\u00eb, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb edhe<\/span>
\nl\u00ebvizjen e lir\u00eb jasht\u00eb vendit t\u00eb t\u00eb rinjve dhe profesionist\u00ebve, vler\u00ebsoj se n\u00eb gjykim nuk u provua<\/span>
\nq\u00eb nevoja p\u00ebr mjek\u00eb t\u00eb rinj t\u00eb ket\u00eb p\u00ebrmasa emergjente t\u00eb atij niveli q\u00eb t\u00eb justifikonte miratimin e<\/span>
\nnj\u00eb mekanizmi ligjor kaq t\u00eb ashp\u00ebr. Nga ana tjet\u00ebr, pranimet n\u00eb programet e studimit nga UMTja vit pas viti jan\u00eb n\u00eb rritje dhe duket se jan\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb larta sesa numri i mjek\u00ebve q\u00eb largohen (shih<\/span>
\nparagrafin 13 m\u00eb sip\u00ebr). P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, duket se n\u00eb situat\u00ebn n\u00eb fjal\u00eb nuk jan\u00eb p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb treguesit<\/span>
\nq\u00eb gjenerohen nga universitetet private t\u00eb mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb, t\u00eb cilat kan\u00eb kuota vjetore t\u00eb planifikuara<\/span>
\ndhe num\u00ebr t\u00eb konsideruesh\u00ebm mjek\u00ebsh t\u00eb rinj q\u00eb diplomohen vit pas viti.<\/span>
\n16. N\u00ebn k\u00ebt\u00eb optik\u00eb, \u00e7moj se subjektet e interesuara nuk arrit\u00ebn t\u00eb shpjegonin n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb<\/span>
\nt\u00eb arsyeshme dhe bind\u00ebse n\u00eb gjykim se p\u00ebrse kjo situat\u00eb u vler\u00ebsua prej tyre emergjente n\u00eb at\u00eb<\/span>
\nmas\u00eb q\u00eb t\u00eb diktonte hartimin e nj\u00eb ligji \u201cemergjent\u201d, jasht\u00eb programit legjislativ dhe me<\/span>
\nprocedur\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrshpejtuar. Po k\u00ebshtu, nuk duket q\u00eb vler\u00ebsimi p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrmarrjen e nj\u00eb nisme t\u00eb till\u00eb<\/span>
\nt\u00eb ket\u00eb qen\u00eb logjik dhe i ndersh\u00ebm, pasi ai i detyron student\u00ebt, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb edhe ata q\u00eb jan\u00eb me<\/span>
\nmund\u00ebsi t\u00eb kufizuara financiare familjare dhe personale, t\u00eb n\u00ebnshkruajn\u00eb nj\u00eb marr\u00ebveshje me<\/span>
\npasoja financiare p\u00ebr ta. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb kuptim, tarifa e studimit n\u00eb arsimin publik \u00ebsht\u00eb shum\u00ebfishuar<\/span>
\nduke u barazuar me kostot e studimit. Konkretisht, kostoja\/tarifa e studimit aktualisht llogaritet<\/span>
\nn\u00eb 248,975 lek\u00eb p\u00ebr student (shih paragrafin 4 t\u00eb vendimit) nga 45,000 lek\u00eb q\u00eb ka qen\u00eb. Kjo vler\u00eb<\/span>
\n\u00ebsht\u00eb shum\u00eb e lart\u00eb dhe e kthen \u201cmarr\u00ebveshjen p\u00ebrpara pranimit n\u00eb programin e studimit p\u00ebr t\u00eb<\/span>
\nushtruar profesionin n\u00eb Shqip\u00ebri\u201d n\u00eb vetvete n\u00eb sanksion ekonomik, pasi i detyron student\u00ebt q\u00eb<\/span>
\nt\u00eb pranojn\u00eb ta n\u00ebnshkruajn\u00eb ose nd\u00ebshkon ata q\u00eb nuk pranojn\u00eb ta n\u00ebnshkruajn\u00eb at\u00eb, duke u hequr<\/span>
\natyre mund\u00ebsin\u00eb e zgjedhjes.<\/span><\/p>\n

\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\n17. Nga ana tjet\u00ebr, pretendimi i subjekteve t\u00eb interesuara se ky mekaniz\u00ebm \u00ebsht\u00eb analog<\/span>
\nme at\u00eb t\u00eb Shkoll\u00ebs s\u00eb Magjistratur\u00ebs \u00ebsht\u00eb i pabazuar, pasi ky i fundit i ofron kandidatit q\u00eb gjat\u00eb<\/span>
\nperiudh\u00ebs s\u00eb ndjekjes s\u00eb programit t\u00eb formimit fillestar t\u00eb p\u00ebrfitoj\u00eb nj\u00eb burs\u00eb shkollimi, e cila<\/span>
\np\u00ebrllogaritet me p\u00ebrqindje mbi pag\u00ebn bruto fillestare t\u00eb tij, t\u00eb cil\u00ebn ai \u00ebsht\u00eb i detyruar ta kthej\u00eb<\/span>
\nt\u00ebr\u00ebsisht ose 50%, n\u00eb rastet e parashikuara shprehimisht n\u00eb ligj (shih nenin 19 t\u00eb ligjit nr.<\/span>
\n96\/2016, dat\u00eb 06.10.2016 \u201cP\u00ebr statusin e gjyqtar\u00ebve dhe prokuror\u00ebve n\u00eb Republik\u00ebn e<\/span>
\nShqip\u00ebris\u00eb\u201d, t\u00eb ndryshuar dhe nenin 267 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 115\/2016, dat\u00eb 03.11.2016 \u201cP\u00ebr organet e<\/span>
\nqeverisjes s\u00eb sistemit t\u00eb drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb\u201d, t\u00eb ndryshuar). Kjo do t\u00eb thot\u00eb se kandidat\u00ebt p\u00ebr magjistrat\u00eb<\/span>
\np\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb burs\u00eb shkollimi dhe detyrohen t\u00eb kthejn\u00eb eventualisht vet\u00ebm burs\u00ebn e p\u00ebrfituar,<\/span>
\np\u00ebrkund\u00ebr detyrimit t\u00eb student\u00ebve t\u00eb mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u2019u sanksionuar me kostot e studimit.<\/span>
\n18. N\u00ebn k\u00ebt\u00eb analiz\u00eb, rezulton se detyrimi n\u00eb fjal\u00eb aplikohet vet\u00ebm ndaj student\u00ebve t\u00eb<\/span>
\nmjek\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb institucionet e arsimit publik dhe n\u00eb nj\u00eb mas\u00eb t\u00eb till\u00eb q\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb raport t\u00eb drejt\u00eb<\/span>
\nme nivelin e jetes\u00ebs. Kjo barr\u00eb b\u00ebhet akoma edhe m\u00eb e ndjeshme, n\u00ebse mbahet n\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb se<\/span>
\nligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi p\u00ebr t\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb t\u00eb zbatuesh\u00ebm ligjin ka vendosur edhe ndalimin e t\u00ebrheqjes s\u00eb diplom\u00ebs. N\u00eb<\/span>
\nk\u00ebt\u00eb kontekst, \u00e7moj se mekanizmi ligjor, n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsi, nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb rrjedhoj\u00eb e nj\u00eb vler\u00ebsimi logjik dhe<\/span>
\ne b\u00ebn raportin midis tij dhe nevoj\u00ebs t\u00eb shp\u00ebrpjes\u00ebtuar dhe n\u00eb at\u00eb mas\u00eb q\u00eb e shnd\u00ebrron at\u00eb n\u00eb<\/span>
\narbitrar dhe t\u00eb padrejt\u00eb.<\/span>
\n19. P\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, mb\u00ebshtetur n\u00eb argumentet e m\u00ebsip\u00ebrme, vler\u00ebsoj se Gjykata duhej t\u00eb<\/span>
\nkishte pranuar k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e k\u00ebrkuesve dhe t\u00eb vendoste shfuqizimin e dispozitave ligjore, sipas<\/span>
\nobjektit.<\/span>
\nAn\u00ebtare: Marsida Xhaferllari<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nMendim pjes\u00ebrisht kund\u00ebr<\/span>
\n1. N\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen objekt gjykimi kam votuar p\u00ebr pranimin e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs sipas objektit, ndaj dhe<\/span>
\nn\u00eb vijim do t\u00eb paraqes argumentet mbi t\u00eb cilat mb\u00ebshtetet ky q\u00ebndrim.<\/span>
\n2. Shumica ka arritur n\u00eb konkluzionin e shfuqizimit vet\u00ebm t\u00eb fjal\u00ebve q\u00eb parashikojn\u00eb<\/span>
\nafatet ligjore p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb studimeve, n\u00eb dispozitat objekt kund\u00ebrshtimi, p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nshkak t\u00eb mosrespektimit t\u00eb parimit t\u00eb proporcionalitetit, n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb n\u00ebntestit t\u00eb<\/span>
\np\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebris\u00eb. Sipas saj, afatet e p\u00ebrcaktuara nga neni 4 i ligjit nr. 60\/2023 nuk jan\u00eb<\/span>
\nproporcionale, si dhe duke pasuar parasysh se afati pes\u00eb vje\u00e7ar, i parashikuar n\u00eb pik\u00ebn 1,<\/span>
\nshkronjat \u201cb\u201d dhe \u201cc\u201d t\u00eb k\u00ebtij neni, \u00ebsht\u00eb gati i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb me vet\u00eb koh\u00ebzgjatjen e studimeve, dhe duke<\/span>
\nmarr\u00eb n\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb eksperiencat e ngjashme t\u00eb vendeve t\u00eb tjera, ajo vler\u00ebson q\u00eb t\u00eb rishikohet<\/span>
\nky afat deri n\u00eb nj\u00eb kufi jo m\u00eb t\u00eb gjat\u00eb sesa tre vjet. Po k\u00ebshtu ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi duhet t\u00eb rishikoj\u00eb me<\/span>
\nq\u00ebllim q\u00eb t\u00eb garantoj\u00eb parimin e proporcionalitetit t\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrjes edhe afatet e tjera tre dhe dy<\/span>
\nvje\u00e7are t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuara n\u00eb pik\u00ebn 2, shkronjat \u201ca\u201d dhe \u201cb\u201d dhe pik\u00ebn 3, shkronjat \u201ca\u201d dhe \u201cb\u201d t\u00eb<\/span>
\nnenit 4 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023 (shih paragrafin 72 t\u00eb vendimit). Nd\u00ebrsa n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin tim, n\u00eb vetvete<\/span>
\nmasa nd\u00ebrhyr\u00ebse legjislative, pra pun\u00ebsimi me detyrim n\u00eb sistemin mjek\u00ebsor publik pas<\/span>
\ndiplomimit t\u00eb student\u00ebve t\u00eb mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb dhe pagesa e kostove t\u00eb studimit n\u00eb rast mospranimi t\u00eb<\/span>
\nn\u00ebnshkrimit t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim, nuk plot\u00ebson kriterin kushtetues t\u00eb proporcionalitetit, n\u00eb<\/span>
\ndrejtim t\u00eb secilit prej n\u00ebnkritereve t\u00eb testit t\u00eb proporcionalitetit, p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsisht nevoj\u00ebs,<\/span>
\ndomosdoshm\u00ebris\u00eb dhe p\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebris\u00eb, t\u00eb analizuara s\u00eb bashku ose ve\u00e7 e ve\u00e7.<\/span>
\n3. N\u00eb parim, n\u00eb gjykimin tim, zbatimi i ligjit objekt shqyrtimi imponon nj\u00eb barr\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\ntepruar mbi student\u00ebt dhe n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb d\u00ebshton n\u00eb arritjen e nj\u00eb ekuilibri t\u00eb drejt\u00eb midis<\/span>
\ninteresit publik p\u00ebr mbrojtjen e sh\u00ebndetit publik dhe ofrimit t\u00eb kujdesit mjek\u00ebsor, nga nj\u00ebra an\u00eb,<\/span>
\ndhe interesit t\u00eb student\u00ebve p\u00ebr arsim publik dhe s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr pun\u00eb t\u00eb ligjshme e q\u00eb duhet ta<\/span>
\nzgjedhin vet\u00eb, nga ana tjet\u00ebr.<\/span>
\n4. Referuar \u00e7\u00ebshtjes konkrete, rezulton se Kuvendi, n\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb propozimit t\u00eb K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMinistrave dhe n\u00eb zbatim t\u00eb procedur\u00ebs s\u00eb p\u00ebrshpejtuar parlamentare, ka miratuar ligjin nr.<\/span>
\n60\/2023. Ky ligj ka parashikuar nj\u00eb mekaniz\u00ebm p\u00ebrmes s\u00eb cilit student\u00ebve q\u00eb ndjekin programin<\/span>
\ne integruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e p\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb institucionet publike t\u00eb<\/span>
\narsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb u ofrohet nj\u00eb trajtim e ve\u00e7ant\u00eb, i cili, n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 3, pika 1, t\u00eb ligjit, p\u00ebrfshin<\/span>
\npun\u00ebsimin me prioritet t\u00eb tyre pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb studimeve, si dhe t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrfituar nga<\/span>
\nprogramet sociale t\u00eb strehimit. Ky trajtim p\u00ebrfitohet si nga kandidati q\u00eb pranohet rishtazi n\u00eb<\/span>
\nprogramin e integruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e p\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb institucionet<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\npublike t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb, ashtu edhe nga studenti i vitit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb deri n\u00eb vitin e kat\u00ebrt akademik<\/span>
\ndhe nga studenti i vitit t\u00eb pest\u00eb ose t\u00eb gjasht\u00eb (student i nd\u00ebrmjet\u00ebm) n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb program, kur pranon<\/span>
\nt\u00eb n\u00ebnshkruaj\u00eb marr\u00ebveshje me ministrin\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebse p\u00ebr arsimin, ministrin\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebse p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nsh\u00ebndet\u00ebsin\u00eb dhe institucionin e arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb publik. Sipas marr\u00ebveshjes, studenti duhet t\u00eb<\/span>
\npunoj\u00eb n\u00eb profesionin e mjekut pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb studimeve p\u00ebr, respektivisht, jo m\u00eb pak se<\/span>
\npes\u00eb vjet, tre vjet dhe dy vjet, n\u00eb institucionet sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore n\u00eb Republik\u00ebn e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb, si dhe<\/span>
\npranon kalimin zyrtarisht t\u00eb diplom\u00ebs p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb nga institucioni publik i arsimit<\/span>
\nt\u00eb lart\u00eb, ku ka p\u00ebrfunduar studimet, n\u00eb institucionin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor ku pun\u00ebsohet deri n\u00eb shlyerjen e<\/span>
\ndetyrimeve p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim sipas afatit, p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsit, 5-vje\u00e7ar, 3-vje\u00e7ar dhe 2-vje\u00e7ar, me t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn q\u00eb<\/span>
\npas p\u00ebrmbushjes s\u00eb detyrimit t\u00eb pun\u00ebsimit t\u00eb t\u00ebrheq\u00eb diplom\u00ebn universitare (neni 4, pika 1,<\/span>
\nshkronja \u201cc\u201d, pika 2, shkronja \u201cb\u201d, pika 3, shkronja \u2018b\u201d, i ligjit nr. 60\/2023). Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb studenti<\/span>
\nq\u00eb nuk pranon t\u00eb n\u00ebnshkruaj\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjen sipas p\u00ebrcaktimeve t\u00eb pikave 2 dhe 3 t\u00eb nenit 4,<\/span>
\npaguan vler\u00ebn e plot\u00eb t\u00eb kostos s\u00eb studimeve (neni 5 i ligjit nr. 60\/2023).<\/span>
\n5. K\u00ebrkuesit n\u00eb lidhje me k\u00ebto parashikime ligjore, t\u00eb cilat i kund\u00ebrshtojn\u00eb si n\u00eb cenim t\u00eb<\/span>
\ns\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr arsim dhe s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim, kan\u00eb pretenduar se p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrhyrjen nuk ekziston<\/span>
\nnj\u00eb situat\u00eb emergjente, q\u00eb t\u00eb ket\u00eb ulje t\u00eb numrit t\u00eb mjek\u00ebve n\u00eb raport me popullsin\u00eb. Mjetet e<\/span>
\np\u00ebrdorura nuk jan\u00eb t\u00eb domosdoshme, q\u00eb do t\u00eb thot\u00eb se synimi mund t\u00eb arrihej me mjete t\u00eb tjera.<\/span>
\nGarantimi i sh\u00ebrbimit mjek\u00ebsor nuk ka asnj\u00eb lidhje me pagimin e vler\u00ebs s\u00eb plot\u00eb t\u00eb kostos s\u00eb<\/span>
\nstudimeve, nd\u00ebrhyrja nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e p\u00ebrshtatshme p\u00ebr realizimin e k\u00ebtij q\u00ebllimi, si dhe nuk e<\/span>
\ninfluencon at\u00eb. Objektivi i ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsit nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb mjaftueshm\u00ebrisht i r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm p\u00ebr t\u00eb justifikuar<\/span>
\nkufizimin e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs (shih paragrafin 9.2. t\u00eb vendimit).<\/span>
\n6. Po n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim, Kuvendi ka prap\u00ebsuar se kriteret p\u00ebr vendosjen e kufizimit sipas<\/span>
\nnenit 17 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs jan\u00eb plot\u00ebsuar. E drejta p\u00ebr kujdes sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor synon mbrojtjen e s\u00eb<\/span>
\ndrejt\u00ebs s\u00eb jet\u00ebs, p\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb shteti ka interes publik q\u00eb t\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyj\u00eb n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb aspekt. Q\u00ebllimi i<\/span>
\nligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsit gjat\u00eb hartimit dhe miratimit t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023 ka qen\u00eb sigurimi i nj\u00eb raporti t\u00eb drejt\u00eb<\/span>
\nmidis kufizimit t\u00eb vendosur dhe interesit publik. P\u00ebr sa i p\u00ebrket kriterit t\u00eb proporcionalitetit,<\/span>
\ninteresi publik n\u00eb garantimin e sh\u00ebrbimit mjek\u00ebsor p\u00ebr popullsin\u00eb mbizot\u00ebron ndaj pritshm\u00ebris\u00eb<\/span>
\ns\u00eb student\u00ebve, q\u00eb jan\u00eb n\u00eb ndjekje e sip\u00ebr t\u00eb programit t\u00eb studimit n\u00eb mjek\u00ebsi, p\u00ebr t\u00eb vijuar edhe<\/span>
\nkoh\u00ebn e mbetur t\u00eb studimit me t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin trajtim dhe kushte q\u00eb kan\u00eb pasur deri m\u00eb sot (shih<\/span>
\nparagraf\u00ebt 10.2.1. dhe 10.2.2. t\u00eb vendimit). Edhe subjekti i interesuar, KM-ja, ka prap\u00ebsuar se<\/span>
\npandemia bot\u00ebrore COVID-19 ka gjeneruar efekte negative, ndaj politikat p\u00ebr rim\u00ebk\u00ebmbje duhet<\/span>
\nt\u00eb rimodelohen. Ligji objekt shqyrtimi \u00ebsht\u00eb hartuar n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me strategjit\u00eb kryesore n\u00eb vend,<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\ne konkretisht me q\u00ebllimet e politikave n\u00eb fushat e arsimit, sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsis\u00eb dhe pun\u00ebsimit (shih<\/span>
\nparagrafin 11.2. t\u00eb vendimit).<\/span>
\n7. Lidhur me kufizimet e t\u00eb drejtave themelore kushtetuese, Gjykata ka nj\u00eb jurisprudenc\u00eb<\/span>
\nt\u00eb konsoliduar, sipas s\u00eb cil\u00ebs p\u00ebr vler\u00ebsimin e proporcionalitetit t\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrjes merret n\u00eb shqyrtim<\/span>
\nbalanca nd\u00ebrmjet d\u00ebmit t\u00eb shkaktuar individit dhe s\u00eb mir\u00ebs s\u00eb p\u00ebrgjithshme t\u00eb shoq\u00ebris\u00eb, masa e<\/span>
\nmbrojtjes nga arbitrariteti q\u00eb ofrojn\u00eb procedurat ligjore, si dhe mund\u00ebsia e shtetit p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrdorur<\/span>
\nm\u00ebnyra a mjete t\u00eb tjera p\u00ebr t\u00eb arritur q\u00ebllimin. Shteti, brenda mund\u00ebsive, duhet t\u00eb kufizoj\u00eb<\/span>
\nnd\u00ebrhyrjen n\u00eb minimum, duke k\u00ebrkuar zgjidhje alternative dhe, p\u00ebrgjith\u00ebsisht, duke u p\u00ebrpjekur<\/span>
\nt\u2019i arrij\u00eb q\u00ebllimet n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb sa m\u00eb pak t\u00eb d\u00ebmshme nga pik\u00ebpamja e t\u00eb drejtave t\u00eb njeriut (shih<\/span>
\nvendimin nr. 17, dat\u00eb 23.04.2010 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese). P\u00ebrdorimi i k\u00ebtyre mjeteve duhet t\u00eb<\/span>
\njet\u00eb i domosdosh\u00ebm, \u00e7ka do t\u00eb thot\u00eb se synimi nuk mund t\u00eb arrihet me mjete t\u00eb tjera.<\/span>
\nDomosdoshm\u00ebria lidhet edhe me p\u00ebrdorimin e mjeteve m\u00eb pak t\u00eb d\u00ebmshme p\u00ebr subjektet q\u00eb u<\/span>
\ncenohen t\u00eb drejtat dhe lirit\u00eb. Po k\u00ebshtu, nd\u00ebrhyrja p\u00ebr kufizimin e nj\u00eb t\u00eb drejte ose lirie t\u00eb b\u00ebhet<\/span>
\nme mjete t\u00eb p\u00ebrshtatshme q\u00eb i p\u00ebrgjigjen drejt q\u00ebllimit q\u00eb synohet t\u00eb arrihet (shih vendimet nr.<\/span>
\n30, dat\u00eb 05.07.2021; nr. 20, dat\u00eb 20.04.2021; nr. 16, dat\u00eb 01.03.2017 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese).<\/span>
\n8. Po sipas Gjykat\u00ebs, p\u00ebr vler\u00ebsimin e proporcionalitetit duhen mbajtur n\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb<\/span>
\ndisa n\u00ebnkritere: (i) n\u00ebse objektivi i ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsit \u00ebsht\u00eb mjaftueshm\u00ebrisht i r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm p\u00ebr t\u00eb<\/span>
\njustifikuar kufizimin e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs; (ii) n\u00ebse masat e marra jan\u00eb t\u00eb lidhura n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb arsyeshme<\/span>
\nme objektivin, ato nuk mund t\u00eb jen\u00eb arbitrare, t\u00eb padrejta ose t\u00eb bazuara mbi vler\u00ebsime alogjike;<\/span>
\n(iii) n\u00ebse mjetet e p\u00ebrdorura nuk jan\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb ashpra se sa duhet p\u00ebr t\u00eb arritur objektivin e k\u00ebrkuar,<\/span>
\nsa m\u00eb t\u00eb m\u00ebdha efektet e d\u00ebmshme t\u00eb mas\u00ebs s\u00eb p\u00ebrzgjedhur, aq m\u00eb tep\u00ebr duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb i<\/span>
\nr\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm objektivi p\u00ebr t\u2019u arritur, n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb masa t\u00eb justifikohet si e nevojshme (shih<\/span>
\nvendimet nr. 20, dat\u00eb 20.04.2021; nr. 11, dat\u00eb 09.03.2021; nr. 33, dat\u00eb 08.06.2016 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs<\/span>
\nKushtetuese).<\/span>
\n9. P\u00ebrve\u00e7 sa m\u00eb lart, kjo Gjykat\u00eb mban n\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb prezumimin e pajtueshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb<\/span>
\naktit normativ me Kushtetut\u00ebn, derisa pal\u00ebt t\u2019i provojn\u00eb asaj t\u00eb kund\u00ebrt\u00ebn. Kjo do t\u00eb thot\u00eb se<\/span>
\nlidhur me jokushtetutshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e pretenduar argumentet e parashtruara duhet t\u00eb jen\u00eb bind\u00ebse, p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nt\u2019i dh\u00ebn\u00eb mund\u00ebsi k\u00ebsaj Gjykate t\u00eb vler\u00ebsoj\u00eb n\u00ebse zgjidhjet e aplikuara shkelin normat dhe vlerat<\/span>
\nkushtetuese (shih vendimet nr. 30, dat\u00eb 02.11.2022; nr. 5, dat\u00eb 27.01.2017; nr. 52, dat\u00eb<\/span>
\n26.07.2016 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese). Nd\u00ebrsa, n\u00eb v\u00ebshtrim t\u00eb kontrollit kushtetues t\u00eb respektimit<\/span>
\nt\u00eb parimit t\u00eb proporcionalitetit \u00ebsht\u00eb thelb\u00ebsore t\u00eb theksohet se nuk i takon Gjykat\u00ebs t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktoj\u00eb<\/span>
\nn\u00ebse mjeti i p\u00ebrzgjedhur \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00ebnyra m\u00eb e p\u00ebrshtatshme, m\u00eb e arsyeshme ose e duhura, por roli<\/span>
\ni saj \u00ebsht\u00eb t\u00eb kontrolloj\u00eb n\u00ebse p\u00ebrmbajtja e vet\u00eb dispozit\u00ebs normative \u00ebsht\u00eb e pajtueshme me t\u00eb<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\ndrejtat, lirit\u00eb dhe parimet themelore kushtetuese (shih vendimin nr. 55 dat\u00eb 21.07.2015 t\u00eb<\/span>
\nGjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese).<\/span>
\n10. N\u00eb v\u00ebshtrim t\u00eb standardeve t\u00eb sip\u00ebrp\u00ebrmendura, n\u00eb rastin konkret duhet analizuar<\/span>
\nn\u00ebse k\u00ebrkuesit arrit\u00ebn ta p\u00ebrmbysin prezumimin e kushtetutshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb normave ligjore t\u00eb<\/span>
\nkund\u00ebrshtuara n\u00eb raport me tri n\u00ebnkriteret e nd\u00ebrhyrjes: (i) nevoj\u00ebs; (ii) domosdoshm\u00ebris\u00eb, (iii)<\/span>
\np\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebris\u00eb. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim, pyetjet q\u00eb duhej t\u00eb merrnin p\u00ebrgjigje n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb gjykim ishin: A<\/span>
\nishte e nevojshme n\u00eb momentin e marrjes s\u00eb nism\u00ebs ligjore dhe miratimit t\u00eb ligjit nd\u00ebrhyrja<\/span>
\np\u00ebrmes detyrimit p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim t\u00eb student\u00ebve t\u00eb mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb pas diplomimit? A ishte ky mjet<\/span>
\nnd\u00ebrhyr\u00ebs m\u00eb pak i ashpri referuar jo vet\u00ebm afateve detyruese t\u00eb pun\u00ebsimit nga 2, 3 dhe deri n\u00eb 5<\/span>
\nvjet, por edhe detyrimit p\u00ebr pagimin e kostos s\u00eb studimit t\u00eb 5 brezave studentor\u00eb, n\u00eb rast se ata<\/span>
\nnuk pranojn\u00eb t\u00eb n\u00ebnshkruajn\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjen p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse? A kishte mjete t\u00eb tjera p\u00ebr t\u00eb arritur<\/span>
\nobjektivin e synuar, dhe a u shqyrtuan alternativat e tjera nga ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi? A do t\u00eb sjell\u00eb rezultate<\/span>
\nkonkrete ky mjet p\u00ebr realizimin e objektivit t\u00eb synuar?<\/span>
\n11. Duke iu referuar dokumenteve t\u00eb administruara n\u00eb gjykim, k\u00ebrkuesit paraqit\u00ebn<\/span>
\nshkres\u00ebn nr. 3697\/1 t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 17.10.2023 t\u00eb Ministris\u00eb s\u00eb Sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsis\u00eb dhe Mbrojtjes Sociale, me<\/span>
\nt\u00eb cil\u00ebn i kthehet p\u00ebrgjigje organizat\u00ebs \u201cQ\u00ebndresa Qytetare\u201d dhe deklarohet se \u201caktualisht, vendet<\/span>
\nvakante p\u00ebr mjek\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm n\u00eb sistemin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor jan\u00eb 4% e numrit total t\u00eb personelit<\/span>
\nmjek\u00ebsor n\u00eb kujdes par\u00ebsor. Plot\u00ebsimi i 4% t\u00eb vendeve vakante n\u00eb sistem sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb<\/span>
\nproces dinamik dhe nuk ka krijuar munges\u00eb t\u00eb ofrimit t\u00eb sh\u00ebrbimit sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor t\u00eb aksesuesh\u00ebm<\/span>
\ndhe pran\u00eb vendbanimit p\u00ebr qytetar\u00ebt\u201d. Nd\u00ebrsa, sipas parashtrimeve t\u00eb subjekteve t\u00eb interesuara<\/span>
\nn\u00eb seanc\u00eb plenare rezultoi se numri i p\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm i mjek\u00ebve q\u00eb ofrojn\u00eb sh\u00ebrbim n\u00eb sistemin<\/span>
\npar\u00ebsor sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor \u00ebsht\u00eb 5400.<\/span>
\n12. Po k\u00ebshtu, referuar shkres\u00ebs nr. 5288\/10 t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 05.01.2024 t\u00eb K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMinistrave, numri i pozicioneve vakante p\u00ebr mjek\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb 482, numri i mjek\u00ebve n\u00eb mosh\u00eb<\/span>
\npensioni \u00ebsht\u00eb 213 dhe numri i mjek\u00ebve q\u00eb largohen \u00e7do vit jasht\u00eb vendit \u00ebsht\u00eb rreth 200, pasi<\/span>
\nk\u00ebrkojn\u00eb t\u00eb pajisen me certifikat\u00eb t\u00eb sjelljes s\u00eb mir\u00eb, tipike p\u00ebr ata q\u00eb k\u00ebrkojn\u00eb t\u00eb largohen nga<\/span>
\nvendi, pra rreth 895 vende vakante. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, po sipas k\u00ebtij subjekti t\u00eb interesuar, ka pasur rritje<\/span>
\ngraduale t\u00eb numrit t\u00eb kuotave t\u00eb \u00e7elura p\u00ebr \u00e7do vit p\u00ebr programin e studimit \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e<\/span>
\np\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb UMT, duke arritur rreth 500 t\u00eb tilla brenda vitit 2024.<\/span>
\n13. P\u00ebr sa m\u00eb lart, n\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen n\u00eb gjykim, nga k\u00ebrkuesit, p\u00ebrmes shkres\u00ebs s\u00eb sip\u00ebrcituar,<\/span>
\nu p\u00ebrmbys prezumimi i nevoj\u00ebs aktuale p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrhyrjen legjislative p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse, pasi nga Ministria e<\/span>
\nSh\u00ebndet\u00ebsis\u00eb dhe Mbrojtjes Sociale pranohet se plot\u00ebsimi i 4% t\u00eb vendeve vakante p\u00ebr mjek\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\np\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm n\u00eb sistem sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb proces dinamik dhe nuk ka krijuar munges\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\nofrimit t\u00eb sh\u00ebrbimit sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor t\u00eb aksesuesh\u00ebm dhe pran\u00eb vendbanimit p\u00ebr qytetar\u00ebt.<\/span>
\n14. Po n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb nevoj\u00ebs, 4% vende vakante nga numri total i 5400 mjek\u00ebve n\u00eb<\/span>
\nkujdes par\u00ebsor (n\u00eb terma konkret\u00eb 216 vende vakante), nuk justifikon nevoj\u00ebn reale t\u00eb marrjes s\u00eb<\/span>
\nmas\u00ebs kufizuese objekt kund\u00ebrshtimi n\u00eb nj\u00eb kategori t\u00eb zgjeruar prej 5 brezash, kur edhe prurjet<\/span>
\nnga UMT-ja p\u00ebr mjek\u00eb t\u00eb diplomuar vit pas viti, n\u00eb periudh\u00ebn q\u00eb shtrihen efektet e k\u00ebtij ligji,<\/span>
\njan\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb m\u00ebdha se nevojat aktuale p\u00ebr t\u00eb pun\u00ebsuar mjek\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm n\u00eb vendet vakante.<\/span>
\nKonkretisht, nd\u00ebrhyrja legjislative prek nj\u00eb kategori student\u00ebsh q\u00eb i p\u00ebrkasin vitit t\u00eb par\u00eb deri n\u00eb<\/span>
\nvitin e gjasht\u00eb t\u00eb studimeve. Po ashtu, nd\u00ebrhyrja legjislative prek student\u00ebt e vitit t\u00eb par\u00eb q\u00eb do t\u00eb<\/span>
\npranohen n\u00eb sistemin universitar \u00e7do vit, duke filluar nga viti akademik 2023-2024 deri n\u00eb vitin<\/span>
\nakademik 2027 -2028, pra 5 breza student\u00ebsh, q\u00eb n\u00eb var\u00ebsi t\u00eb numrit t\u00eb kuotave t\u00eb pranimit nd\u00ebr<\/span>
\nvite mund t\u00eb arrijn\u00eb, rreth 2500 student\u00eb gjithsej, n\u00ebse pranimet do t\u00eb jen\u00eb rreth 500 kuota n\u00eb vit,<\/span>
\nsikund\u00ebr pranimet p\u00ebr vitin akademik 2023-2024, referuar vendimit nr.17\/2023 t\u00eb senatit<\/span>
\nakademik t\u00eb UMT-s\u00eb. N\u00eb k\u00ebto kushte, vler\u00ebsoj se subjekti i interesuar nuk ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb argumente<\/span>
\nse situata faktike e evidentuar n\u00eb koh\u00ebn e miratimit t\u00eb ligjit objekt kund\u00ebrshtimi p\u00ebr ekzistenc\u00ebn e<\/span>
\nnevoj\u00ebs, mb\u00ebshtetet n\u00eb vler\u00ebsime t\u00eb mjaftueshme p\u00ebr zbatim t\u00eb kufizimit n\u00eb t\u00eb gjith\u00eb kategorin\u00eb e<\/span>
\nzgjeruar t\u00eb student\u00ebve t\u00eb mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb, (5 breza t\u00eb plot\u00eb student\u00ebsh me nga 6 vjet shkollim dhe 5<\/span>
\nbreza student\u00ebsh q\u00eb preken pjes\u00ebrisht, sipas vitit t\u00eb studimit ku ndodhen deri n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim t\u00eb<\/span>
\nprogramit). N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim, nuk pajtohem me argumentet e shumic\u00ebs, se situata faktike e<\/span>
\nevidentuar n\u00eb koh\u00ebn e miratimit t\u00eb k\u00ebtij ligji, e provuar edhe gjat\u00eb k\u00ebtij gjykimi dhe q\u00eb lidhet me<\/span>
\nproblematikat n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb raportit t\u00eb numrit t\u00eb mjek\u00ebve dhe popullsis\u00eb, \u00ebsht\u00eb rrethan\u00eb q\u00eb b\u00ebn t\u00eb<\/span>
\nqart\u00eb ekzistenc\u00ebn e nevoj\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u00eb vepruar nga ana e ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsit n\u00eb miratimin e ligjit nr. 60\/2023,<\/span>
\ne cila \u00ebsht\u00eb e till\u00eb q\u00eb justifikon kufizimin n\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr pun\u00eb, t\u00eb garantuar nga neni 49, pika 1,<\/span>
\ni Kushtetut\u00ebs, (shih paragrafin 65 t\u00eb vendimit). Kjo pasi n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin tim, problematikat e<\/span>
\nevidentuara n\u00eb gjykim n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb raportit t\u00eb numrit t\u00eb mjek\u00ebve dhe popullsis\u00eb, lidhen me nj\u00eb<\/span>
\nnevoj\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrhershme p\u00ebr p\u00ebrmir\u00ebsimin e kujdesit sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor dhe cil\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb sh\u00ebrbimit<\/span>
\nsh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor, si e drejt\u00eb kushtetuese me natyr\u00eb progresive dhe nuk jan\u00eb rrethana t\u00eb tilla q\u00eb mund<\/span>
\nt\u00eb argumentonin nevoj\u00ebn aktuale dhe reale p\u00ebr plot\u00ebsim t\u00eb vendeve vakante ekzistuese p\u00ebr mjek\u00eb<\/span>
\nt\u00eb p\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm n\u00eb sistemin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor, p\u00ebrmes mas\u00ebs kufizuese legjislative objekt<\/span>
\nkund\u00ebrshtimi.<\/span>
\n15. Po ashtu, duke argumentuar m\u00eb lart se nuk ka ekzistuar nevoja aktuale si kusht<\/span>
\nparaprak p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrhyrjen legjislative, n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin tim nuk plot\u00ebsohet as domosdoshm\u00ebria.<\/span>
\nMegjithat\u00eb, edhe n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb domosdoshm\u00ebris\u00eb nuk u provua se kjo ishte masa m\u00eb pak e<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nashp\u00ebr, n\u00eb kuptimin q\u00eb edhe n\u00ebse nd\u00ebrhyrja detyruese p\u00ebr vitet e pun\u00ebsimit t\u00eb ishte i vetmi mjet<\/span>
\np\u00ebr arritjen e objektivit, ai lidhet n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb paarsyeshme me detyrimin p\u00ebr pagimin e kostove<\/span>
\np\u00ebr ata student\u00eb t\u00eb mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb q\u00eb nuk e pranojn\u00eb, duke e kthyer mas\u00ebn n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsi t\u00eb ashp\u00ebr. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb<\/span>
\ndrejtim, nga subjektet e interesuara nuk u provua se p\u00ebrse nuk u analizua paraprakisht jo<\/span>
\ndetyrimi p\u00ebr pagimin e kostove p\u00ebr shkollim p\u00ebr ata student\u00eb mjek\u00ebsie q\u00eb nuk e pranojn\u00eb at\u00eb<\/span>
\ndetyrim, por edhe mjete t\u00eb tjera alternative si p.sh. nxitja dhe mb\u00ebshtetja p\u00ebrmes pagimit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nshpenzimeve personale t\u00eb shkollimit nga ana e shtetit p\u00ebr ata student\u00eb t\u00eb mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb q\u00eb do t\u00eb<\/span>
\npranonin pun\u00ebsimin me detyrim. Sa student\u00eb t\u00eb prekur nga ky ligj, potencialisht mund t\u00eb<\/span>
\npranonin detyrimin p\u00ebrkat\u00ebs lidhur me pun\u00ebsimin me detyrim, n\u00ebse shteti do u merrte p\u00ebrsip\u00ebr<\/span>
\nshpenzimet personale t\u00eb jetes\u00ebs? Sa mund\u00ebsi financiare kishte shteti n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb aspekt? Kjo, pasi n\u00eb<\/span>
\nvler\u00ebsimin tim, pun\u00ebsimi me detyrim sipas viteve p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse, duke mos e kombinuar me pages\u00ebn<\/span>
\ne kostos s\u00eb studimit n\u00eb rast mospranimi t\u00eb n\u00ebnshkrimit t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs, mund t\u00eb rezultonte si nj\u00eb<\/span>
\nmas\u00eb m\u00eb pak t\u00eb ashp\u00ebr sa i p\u00ebrket ekuilibrit t\u00eb interesave publike p\u00ebr ofrimin e kujdesit mjek\u00ebsor,<\/span>
\nnga nj\u00ebra an\u00eb, dhe interesit t\u00eb student\u00ebve p\u00ebr arsim publik dhe s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr pun\u00eb t\u00eb ligjshme e<\/span>
\nq\u00eb duhet ta zgjedhin vet\u00eb, nga ana tjet\u00ebr. Ndaj, n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim, nuk pajtohem me shumic\u00ebn, sipas<\/span>
\ns\u00eb cil\u00ebs, edhe nga vet\u00eb k\u00ebrkuesit, n\u00eb lidhje me mund\u00ebsit\u00eb reale p\u00ebr t\u00eb miratuar ndonj\u00eb skem\u00eb<\/span>
\ntjet\u00ebr t\u00eb pun\u00ebsimit, nuk u evidentua ndonj\u00eb mas\u00eb ose skem\u00eb tjet\u00ebr q\u00eb mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrdorej n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb<\/span>
\ndrejtim, e cila mund t\u00eb sillte t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin efekt t\u00eb d\u00ebshiruar dhe q\u00eb do t\u00eb ishte eficiente p\u00ebr<\/span>
\np\u00ebrmbushjen e q\u00ebllimit t\u00eb synuar dhe, nga ana tjet\u00ebr, m\u00eb pak ose aspak kufizuese e t\u00eb drejtave t\u00eb<\/span>
\nstudent\u00ebve. N\u00eb k\u00ebto kushte, ajo vler\u00ebson se masa e kund\u00ebrshtuar plot\u00ebson edhe k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e t\u00eb<\/span>
\nqenit e domosdoshme. (shih paragrafin 67 t\u00eb vendimit).<\/span>
\n16. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb p\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebris\u00eb nuk rezulton dokumentacion paraprak<\/span>
\ndhe analiz\u00eb mb\u00ebshtet\u00ebse e mjaftueshme q\u00eb masa mund t\u00eb sjell\u00eb rezultat, pra t\u00eb jet\u00eb efektive. N\u00eb<\/span>
\nvler\u00ebsimin tim, q\u00ebllimi thelb\u00ebsor i nd\u00ebrhyrjes n\u00eb t\u00eb drejtat themelore me ligj, p\u00ebr t\u2019i kufizuar ato<\/span>
\np\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb nj\u00eb nevoje publike, \u00ebsht\u00eb arritja e objektivave t\u00eb synuar, ndaj edhe efektiviteti merr<\/span>
\nr\u00ebnd\u00ebsi kryesore n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb kontrollit kushtetues t\u00eb parimit t\u00eb proporcionalitetit. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb<\/span>
\naspekt, raporti q\u00eb shoq\u00ebronte projektligjin n\u00eb Komisionin e Pun\u00ebs, \u00c7\u00ebshtjeve Sociale dhe<\/span>
\nSh\u00ebndet\u00ebsis\u00eb nisej nga premisa t\u00eb pabazuara dhe jo t\u00eb mb\u00ebshtetura n\u00eb fakte konkrete. Sipas k\u00ebtij<\/span>
\nraporti, parashikohej se \u201c\u202650% e student\u00ebve do t\u00eb pranojn\u00eb t\u00eb n\u00ebnshkruajn\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjen\u201d. Po<\/span>
\nsipas raportit, \u201c\u2026n\u00eb rast se t\u00eb gjith\u00eb student\u00ebt nuk do ta pranojn\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjen dhe do t\u00eb<\/span>
\npaguajn\u00eb koston e plot\u00eb t\u00eb studimeve, efekti financiar do t\u00eb jet\u00eb\u2026, por sipas k\u00ebtij skenari q\u00eb<\/span>
\nasnj\u00eb student nuk do t\u00eb pranoj\u00eb t\u00eb n\u00ebnshkruaj\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjen p\u00ebr q\u00ebndrim 2-5 vje\u00e7ar n\u00eb Shqip\u00ebri<\/span>
\n\u00ebsht\u00eb skenar jo realist\u201d.<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\n17. P\u00ebr sa m\u00eb lart, nuk rezultoi e mb\u00ebshtetur me t\u00eb dh\u00ebna dhe analiza paraprake se si<\/span>
\n\u00ebsht\u00eb vler\u00ebsuar se 50% e student\u00ebve do ta pranojn\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjen dhe n\u00eb hipotez\u00ebn q\u00eb t\u00eb gjith\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\npaguajn\u00eb koston e studimit dhe mos ta n\u00ebnshkruajn\u00eb at\u00eb, q\u00eb mund t\u00eb mos jet\u00eb dhe aq situat\u00eb<\/span>
\njorealiste, cila do t\u00eb ishte nj\u00eb mas\u00eb tjet\u00ebr sipas K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Ministrave p\u00ebr plot\u00ebsimin e mungesave<\/span>
\np\u00ebr mjek\u00eb n\u00eb sistemin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor. Edhe n\u00eb seanc\u00eb gjyq\u00ebsore, pyetjes n\u00ebse t\u00eb gjith\u00eb student\u00ebt e<\/span>
\nprekur nuk do t\u00eb pranonin t\u00eb n\u00ebnshkruanin kontrat\u00ebn, \u00e7far\u00eb alternative do t\u00eb kishte p\u00ebr plot\u00ebsimin<\/span>
\ne vendeve vakante, K\u00ebshilli i Ministrave, si subjekt i interesuar, iu p\u00ebrgjigj se do t\u00eb merreshin<\/span>
\nmasa t\u00eb tjera, duke mos i konkretizuar se cilat jan\u00eb ose cilat do t\u00eb ishin (shih procesverbalet e<\/span>
\nseanc\u00ebs gjyq\u00ebsore). N\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb testit t\u00eb p\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebris\u00eb, sipas t\u00eb cilit masa q\u00eb ka kufizuar t\u00eb<\/span>
\ndrejt\u00ebn duhet t\u00eb sjell\u00eb efektin e duhur dhe t\u00eb realizoj\u00eb synimin p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilin \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrzgjedhur, nuk<\/span>
\nu provua se kjo mas\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb bazuar mbi vler\u00ebsime logjike, q\u00eb mund t\u00eb realizonte objektivin e<\/span>
\nsynuar me kufizim m\u00eb pak t\u00eb ashp\u00ebr, ndaj edhe n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim kjo nd\u00ebrhyrje nuk plot\u00ebson<\/span>
\nstandardet e efektivitetit dhe t\u00eb racionalitetit.<\/span>
\n18. N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, vler\u00ebsoj se dispozitat ligjore objekt kund\u00ebrshtimi nuk respektojn\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\ndrejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr arsim dhe t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim t\u00eb student\u00ebve t\u00eb mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb, si rezultat i nd\u00ebrhyrjes<\/span>
\njoproporcionale t\u00eb ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsit, referuar nenit 17 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs dhe jurisprudenc\u00ebs s\u00eb konsoliduar<\/span>
\nt\u00eb k\u00ebsaj Gjykate, ndaj dhe k\u00ebrkesa duhej pranuar n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsi.<\/span>
\nAn\u00ebtare: Elsa Toska<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nMendim pjes\u00ebrisht kund\u00ebr<\/span>
\n1. N\u00eb gjykimin kushtetues t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes nr. 1 (Nj) 2023 t\u00eb Regjistrit Themeltar, q\u00eb i p\u00ebrket<\/span>
\nk\u00ebrkes\u00ebs s\u00eb nj\u00eb grupi deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se nj\u00eb e pesta e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb<\/span>
\ngrupi student\u00ebsh, me objekt: \u201cShfuqizimin e nenit 4, pikat 1, shkronja \u201cc\u201d, 2, shkronja \u201cb\u201d, 3,<\/span>
\nshkronja \u201cb\u201d dhe nenit 5, fjalia e par\u00eb t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023 \u201cP\u00ebr trajtimin e ve\u00e7ant\u00eb t\u00eb student\u00ebve<\/span>
\nq\u00eb ndjekin programin e integruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e p\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb<\/span>
\ninstitucionet publike t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb\u201d, si dhe pezullimin e tij deri n\u00eb hyrjen n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb vendimit<\/span>
\np\u00ebrfundimtar t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs\u201d, ndaj q\u00ebndrim pjes\u00ebrisht t\u00eb ndrysh\u00ebm nga shumica p\u00ebr sa i p\u00ebrket<\/span>
\nzgjidhjes s\u00eb k\u00ebsaj \u00e7\u00ebshtjeje, pasi vler\u00ebsoj se duhej t\u00eb ishte vendosur pranimi i plot\u00eb i k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs,<\/span>
\nduke parashtruar argumentet si m\u00eb posht\u00eb vijojn\u00eb.<\/span>
\n2. N\u00eb dat\u00ebn 21.07.2023 Kuvendi, n\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb propozimit t\u00eb K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Ministrave dhe n\u00eb<\/span>
\nzbatimit t\u00eb procedur\u00ebs s\u00eb p\u00ebrshpejtuar parlamentare, ka miratuar ligjin nr. 60\/2023, i cili \u00ebsht\u00eb<\/span>
\nbotuar n\u00eb Fletoren Zyrtare nr. 123, dat\u00eb 16.08.2023 dhe ka hyr\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi 15 dit\u00eb pas botimit t\u00eb tij.<\/span>
\nKy ligj ka parashikuar nj\u00eb mekaniz\u00ebm p\u00ebrmes s\u00eb cilit student\u00ebve q\u00eb ndjekin programin e<\/span>
\nintegruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e p\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb institucionet publike t\u00eb arsimit<\/span>
\nt\u00eb lart\u00eb u ofrohet nj\u00eb trajtim e ve\u00e7ant\u00eb, i cili, n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 3, pika 1, t\u00eb ligjit, p\u00ebrfshin<\/span>
\npun\u00ebsimin me prioritet t\u00eb tyre pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb studimeve, si dhe t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrfituar nga<\/span>
\nprogramet sociale t\u00eb strehimit.<\/span>
\n3. Ky trajtim p\u00ebrfitohet si nga kandidati q\u00eb pranohet rishtazi n\u00eb programin e integruar t\u00eb<\/span>
\nstudimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e p\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb institucionet publike t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb,<\/span>
\nashtu edhe nga studenti i vitit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb deri n\u00eb vitin e kat\u00ebrt akademik dhe nga studenti i vitit t\u00eb<\/span>
\npest\u00eb ose t\u00eb gjasht\u00eb (student i nd\u00ebrmjet\u00ebm) n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb program, kur pranon t\u00eb n\u00ebnshkruaj\u00eb<\/span>
\nmarr\u00ebveshje me ministrin\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebse p\u00ebr arsimin, ministrin\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebse p\u00ebr sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsin\u00eb dhe<\/span>
\ninstitucionin e arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb publik. Sipas marr\u00ebveshjes, studenti duhet t\u00eb punoj\u00eb n\u00eb profesionin<\/span>
\ne mjekut pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb studimeve p\u00ebr, respektivisht, jo m\u00eb pak se pes\u00eb vjet, tre vjet dhe dy<\/span>
\nvjet, n\u00eb institucionet sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore n\u00eb Republik\u00ebn e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb, si dhe pranon kalimin zyrtarisht t\u00eb<\/span>
\ndiplom\u00ebs p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb nga institucioni publik i arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb, ku ka p\u00ebrfunduar<\/span>
\nstudimet, n\u00eb institucionin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor ku pun\u00ebsohet deri n\u00eb shlyerjen e detyrimeve p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim<\/span>
\nsipas afatit, p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsisht, 5-vje\u00e7ar, 3-vje\u00e7ar dhe 2-vje\u00e7ar, me t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn q\u00eb pas p\u00ebrmbushjes s\u00eb<\/span>
\ndetyrimit t\u00eb pun\u00ebsimit t\u00eb t\u00ebrheq\u00eb diplom\u00ebn universitare (neni 4, pika 1, shkronja \u201cc\u201d, pika 2,<\/span>
\nshkronja \u201cb\u201d, pika 3, shkronja \u2018b\u201d, i ligjit nr. 60\/2023). Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb studenti q\u00eb nuk pranon t\u00eb<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nn\u00ebnshkruaj\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjen, sipas p\u00ebrcaktimeve t\u00eb pikave 2 dhe 3 t\u00eb nenit 4, paguan vler\u00ebn e plot\u00eb<\/span>
\nt\u00eb kostos s\u00eb studimeve (neni 5 i ligjit nr. 60\/2023).<\/span>
\n4. K\u00ebrkuesit kan\u00eb pretenduar se dispozitat e kund\u00ebrshtuara t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023 kan\u00eb<\/span>
\ncenuar disa parime dhe t\u00eb drejta kushtetuese, m\u00eb konkretisht parimin e siguris\u00eb juridike, t\u00eb<\/span>
\ngarantuar n\u00eb nenin 4 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr pun\u00eb dhe t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr arsimim, t\u00eb garantuara<\/span>
\nnga nenet 49 dhe 57 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me kriteret e kufizimit t\u00eb parashikuara n\u00eb<\/span>
\nnenin 17 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb mos iu n\u00ebnshtruar pun\u00ebs s\u00eb detyruar, t\u00eb garantuar nga<\/span>
\nneni 26 i Kushtetut\u00ebs, si edhe parimin e barazis\u00eb para ligjit, t\u00eb garantuar nga neni 18 i<\/span>
\nKushtetut\u00ebs. N\u00eb lidhje me parimin e barazis\u00eb p\u00ebrpara ligjit jam dakord me q\u00ebndrimin e shumic\u00ebs<\/span>
\nse ky pretendim \u00ebsht\u00eb i lidhur me vler\u00ebn e kostos financiare t\u00eb studimeve q\u00eb duhet t\u00eb p\u00ebrballojn\u00eb<\/span>
\nstudent\u00ebt q\u00eb nuk pranojn\u00eb t\u00eb n\u00ebnshkruajn\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjen me institucionet sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore publike,<\/span>
\nmetodologjia dhe vlera e t\u00eb cil\u00ebs nuk p\u00ebrcaktohen nga ligji nr. 60\/2023, por jan\u00eb miratuar me<\/span>
\nakte n\u00ebnligjore t\u00eb organeve t\u00eb UMT-s\u00eb q\u00eb nuk jan\u00eb objekt i k\u00ebtij gjykimi kushtetues (shih<\/span>
\nparagrafin 37 t\u00eb vendimit).<\/span>
\n5. N\u00eb lidhje me pretendimet e tjera t\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs, q\u00eb lidhen me t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr arsimim, sipas<\/span>
\nnenit 57 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, shumica ka vler\u00ebsuar se jan\u00eb mb\u00ebshtetur n\u00eb cenimin e t\u00eb drejtave t\u00eb<\/span>
\nfituara dhe pritshm\u00ebrive t\u00eb ligjshme t\u00eb student\u00ebve p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb ndryshimit t\u00eb korniz\u00ebs ligjore q\u00eb<\/span>
\nka qen\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi n\u00eb koh\u00ebn kur ata kan\u00eb filluar studimet n\u00eb Fakultetin e Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb (ligji nr.<\/span>
\n80\/2015), p\u00ebr student\u00ebt e nd\u00ebrmjet\u00ebm, dhe kur kan\u00eb vendosur t\u00eb konkurrojn\u00eb p\u00ebr t`u b\u00ebr\u00eb pjes\u00eb e<\/span>
\natij fakulteti, p\u00ebr student\u00ebt e vitit t\u00eb par\u00eb. P\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, ajo ka vler\u00ebsuar t`i analizoj\u00eb k\u00ebto<\/span>
\npretendime n\u00eb vijim n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb parimit t\u00eb siguris\u00eb juridike. Kurse pretendimet q\u00eb kan\u00eb t\u00eb b\u00ebjn\u00eb<\/span>
\nme cenimin e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u00eb fituar mjetet e jetes\u00ebs me pun\u00eb t\u00eb ligjshme t\u00eb zgjedhur ose pranuar<\/span>
\nvet\u00eb dhe asaj p\u00ebr t\u00eb mos iu n\u00ebnshtruar pun\u00ebs s\u00eb detyruar, p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00ebs se si jan\u00eb<\/span>
\nparashtruar ato, shumica ka vler\u00ebsuar t`i shqyrtoj\u00eb n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbajtjes s\u00eb nenit 49, pika 1, t\u00eb<\/span>
\nKushtetut\u00ebs (shih paragrafin 38 t\u00eb vendimit).<\/span>
\n6. N\u00eb vijim, pasi ka gjetur shkelje t\u00eb parimit t\u00eb siguris\u00eb juridike, p\u00ebr shkak se dispozitat e<\/span>
\nkund\u00ebrshtuara kan\u00eb sjell\u00eb pasoja negative t\u00eb t\u00eb drejtave t\u00eb fituara t\u00eb student\u00ebve, sipas<\/span>
\nparashikimeve ligjore t\u00eb miratuara n\u00eb kuptim dhe zbatim t\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr arsimim, shumica ka<\/span>
\nvler\u00ebsuar se k\u00ebto ndryshime ligjore prekin n\u00eb dukje t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr pun\u00eb t\u00eb parashikuar nga neni<\/span>
\n49 i Kushtetut\u00ebs, ndaj n\u00eb vijim \u00ebsht\u00eb ndalur n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin n\u00ebse kjo e drejt\u00eb kushtetuese e<\/span>
\nstudent\u00ebve \u00ebsht\u00eb kufizuar dhe n\u00ebse jan\u00eb respektuar kriteret e nenit 17 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs (shih<\/span>
\nparagrafin 50 t\u00eb vendimit). Edhe n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb pjes\u00eb t\u00eb vendimit bashkohem me q\u00ebndrimin e shumic\u00ebs,<\/span>
\nashtu si bashkohem edhe me q\u00ebndrimin se n\u00eb rastin konkret nd\u00ebrhyrja e ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsit nuk ka<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nrespektuar kriteret kushtetuese t\u00eb kufizimit. Ajo q\u00eb m\u00eb ndan nga arsyetimi i shumic\u00ebs \u00ebsht\u00eb<\/span>
\nshkaku p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilin ajo ka vendosur t\u00eb shfuqizoj\u00eb dispozitat e kund\u00ebrshtuara nga k\u00ebrkuesit.<\/span>
\n7. Shumica e ka vler\u00ebsuar t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr pun\u00eb n\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb kritereve t\u00eb nenit 17 t\u00eb<\/span>
\nKushtetut\u00ebs, e m\u00eb konkretisht duke ia n\u00ebnshtruar at\u00eb testit kushtetues p\u00ebr t\u00eb par\u00eb n\u00ebse: (i)<\/span>
\nnd\u00ebrhyrja \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb vet\u00ebm me ligj; (ii) ekziston interesi publik; (iii) \u00ebsht\u00eb respektuar parimi i<\/span>
\nproporcionalitetit midis nd\u00ebrhyrjes dhe gjendjes q\u00eb e ka diktuar at\u00eb.<\/span>
\n8. N\u00eb lidhje me kriterin e par\u00eb t\u00eb kufizimit, n\u00eb rastin konkret nuk vihet n\u00eb diskutim<\/span>
\nrespektimi i tij p\u00ebr sa koh\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrja \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb me ligjin nr. 60\/2023, i cili \u00ebsht\u00eb miratuar nga<\/span>
\nKuvendi, sipas procedurave t\u00eb parashikuara p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb q\u00ebllim (shih paragrafin 59 t\u00eb vendimit).<\/span>
\n9. M\u00eb tej, n\u00eb analiz\u00eb t\u00eb kriterit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb t\u00eb kufizimit, atij p\u00ebr interes publik, qasja ime<\/span>
\nndryshon nga ajo e shumic\u00ebs. Gjykata ka theksuar se \u00ebsht\u00eb e v\u00ebshtir\u00eb t\u00eb radhiten n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb<\/span>
\nshteruese \u00e7\u00ebshtjet q\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebjn\u00eb interes publik ose t\u00eb arsyes publike q\u00eb \u00e7ojn\u00eb n\u00eb kufizimin e nj\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\ndrejte themelore, pasi interesi publik duhet kuptuar n\u00eb sensin relativ, n\u00eb var\u00ebsi t\u00eb situatave t\u00eb<\/span>
\nndryshme q\u00eb krijohen. Ato mund t\u00eb renditen vet\u00ebm negativisht, pra n\u00eb aspektin e kufizimit t\u00eb \u00e7do<\/span>
\nrasti konkret. N\u00eb praktik\u00ebn kushtetuese \u00ebsht\u00eb pranuar tashm\u00eb se ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi, parimisht, \u00ebsht\u00eb i lir\u00eb<\/span>
\nt\u00eb veproj\u00eb brenda hap\u00ebsir\u00ebs s\u00eb tij normuese, duke p\u00ebrcaktuar qart\u00eb dhe rast pas rasti q\u00ebllimet q\u00eb<\/span>
\nk\u00ebrkon t\u00eb arrij\u00eb (shih vendimet nr. 20, dat\u00eb 20.04.2021; nr. 16, dat\u00eb 01.03.2017; nr. 1, dat\u00eb<\/span>
\n16.01.2017 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese).<\/span>
\n10. Sipas shumic\u00ebs, referuar subjekteve t\u00eb interesuara, Kuvendit dhe K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMinistrave, interesi publik i evidentuar n\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen konkrete \u00ebsht\u00eb i lidhur drejtp\u00ebrdrejt me<\/span>
\nmir\u00ebfunksionimin e skem\u00ebs s\u00eb kujdesit sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor dhe garantimin e plot\u00ebsimit t\u00eb nevojave p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nburime njer\u00ebzore n\u00eb kryerjen e sh\u00ebrbimeve t\u00eb sh\u00ebndetit publik n\u00eb institucionet sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore, i cili<\/span>
\nrezulton t\u00eb jet\u00eb i lart\u00eb, prandaj ligji \u00ebsht\u00eb hartuar n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me nevojat e diktuara n\u00eb vend.<\/span>
\nShumica ka vler\u00ebsuar se sipas nenit 55 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs shtetasit g\u00ebzojn\u00eb n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb barabart\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\ndrejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr kujdes sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor dhe sigurim sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor nga shteti, i cili ka detyrimin p\u00ebr t\u00eb<\/span>
\nnd\u00ebrhyr\u00eb me q\u00ebllim sigurimin e saj p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjith\u00eb qytetar\u00ebt p\u00ebrmes ofrimit t\u00eb kujdesit sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor<\/span>
\nn\u00eb institucionet e sh\u00ebndetit publik. Kurse sipas nenit 59, pika 1, shkronja \u201cc\u201d, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs,<\/span>
\nshteti, brenda kompetencave kushtetuese dhe mjeteve q\u00eb disponon, synon edhe standardin m\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\nlart\u00eb sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor t\u00eb mundsh\u00ebm. Referuar nenit 2 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 60\/2023, ai synon sigurimin e<\/span>
\nburimeve njer\u00ebzore p\u00ebr kryerjen e sh\u00ebrbimeve t\u00eb sh\u00ebndetit publik n\u00eb institucionet sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore<\/span>
\nn\u00eb Republik\u00ebn e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet p\u00ebrcaktimit t\u00eb rregullave p\u00ebr trajtimin e ve\u00e7ant\u00eb t\u00eb<\/span>
\nstudent\u00ebve q\u00eb ndjekin programin e integruar t\u00eb studimit t\u00eb ciklit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e p\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d<\/span>
\nn\u00eb institucionet publike t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb. P\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, shumica ka vler\u00ebsuar se n\u00eb rastin<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nkonkret ka nj\u00eb interes publik q\u00eb ka justifikuar nd\u00ebrhyrjen n\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e student\u00ebve p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsim,<\/span>
\np\u00ebr sa koh\u00eb q\u00eb me rregullimet ligjore t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuara synohet t\u00eb garantohet ofrimi i sh\u00ebrbimit<\/span>
\nsh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor, n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 55, pika 1, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, si dhe garantimi i standardeve t\u00eb<\/span>
\nsh\u00ebndetit publik, sipas nenit 59, pika 1, shkronja \u201cc\u201d, t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs (shih paragrafin 61 t\u00eb<\/span>
\nvendimit).<\/span>
\n11. Sipas k\u00ebrkuesve, ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi ka rritur tarif\u00ebn e studimeve deri n\u00eb koston e plot\u00eb t\u00eb tyre<\/span>
\npa nj\u00eb q\u00ebllim legjitim. Detyrimi p\u00ebr t\u00eb paguar vler\u00ebn e plot\u00eb t\u00eb kostos s\u00eb studimeve p\u00ebr student\u00ebt<\/span>
\nq\u00eb preferojn\u00eb t\u00eb ruajn\u00eb status quo-n\u00eb nuk i p\u00ebrgjigjet objektivit kryesor t\u00eb tij, q\u00eb ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me<\/span>
\nsigurimin e stafit mjek\u00ebsor n\u00eb periudh\u00eb afatgjat\u00eb. Edhe kufizimi i marrjes s\u00eb diplom\u00ebs nuk i<\/span>
\nsh\u00ebrben interesit publik dhe e drejta e student\u00ebve p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrfituar diplom\u00ebn \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb e drejt\u00eb<\/span>
\nthemelore q\u00eb nuk mund t\u00eb lidhet me suksesin e marr\u00ebveshjes. N\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin tim ky pretendim i<\/span>
\nk\u00ebrkuesve \u00ebsht\u00eb i bazuar dhe n\u00eb rastin konkret, n\u00eb ndryshim nga p\u00ebrfundimi i arritur nga<\/span>
\nshumica, interesi publik nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb i justifikuar pasi masat e p\u00ebrdorura jan\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb ashpra se sa<\/span>
\nduhet p\u00ebr t\u00eb arritur objektivin e k\u00ebrkuar, duke cenuar k\u00ebshtu t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn kushtetuese t\u00eb student\u00ebve<\/span>
\np\u00ebr arsim.<\/span>
\n12. Referuar parashtrimeve me shkrim dhe atyre t\u00eb paraqitura n\u00eb seanc\u00eb plenare publike<\/span>
\nnga subjektet e interesuara, rezulton se numri i p\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm i mjek\u00ebve q\u00eb ofrojn\u00eb sh\u00ebrbim n\u00eb<\/span>
\nsistemin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor \u00ebsht\u00eb 5400, q\u00eb n\u00eb raport me numrin e popullsis\u00eb i takon 1.93 mjek\u00eb p\u00ebr \u00e7do<\/span>
\n1000 banor\u00eb. Numri i pozicioneve vakante p\u00ebr mjek\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb 482, numri i mjek\u00ebve n\u00eb mosh\u00eb<\/span>
\npensioni \u00ebsht\u00eb 213 dhe numri i mjek\u00ebve q\u00eb largohen \u00e7do vit jasht\u00eb vendit \u00ebsht\u00eb rreth 200. Bazuar<\/span>
\nn\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat e m\u00ebsip\u00ebrme, sikurse \u00ebsht\u00eb deklaruar n\u00eb seanc\u00eb edhe nga subjekti i interesuar,<\/span>
\nK\u00ebshilli i Ministrave, rezultojn\u00eb 1000 vende vakante p\u00ebr mjek\u00eb. Aktualisht, vendet vakante p\u00ebr<\/span>
\nmjek\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm n\u00eb sistemin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor p\u00ebrb\u00ebjn\u00eb vet\u00ebm 4% te numrit total t\u00eb personelit<\/span>
\nmjek\u00ebsor n\u00eb kujdes par\u00ebsor. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb ka pasur rritje graduale t\u00eb numrit t\u00eb kuotave t\u00eb \u00e7elura<\/span>
\np\u00ebr \u00e7do vit p\u00ebr programin e studimit \u201cMjek\u00ebsi e p\u00ebrgjithshme\u201d n\u00eb UMT, duke arritur rreth 500 t\u00eb<\/span>
\ntilla brenda vitit 2024. K\u00ebto t\u00eb dh\u00ebna jan\u00eb referuar edhe nga vet\u00eb shumica n\u00eb vendimin e saj,<\/span>
\nbazuar n\u00eb sa kan\u00eb parashtruar subjektet e interesuara (shih paragrafin 69 t\u00eb vendimit).<\/span>
\n13. N\u00eb analiz\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebtyre t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave, duke mbajtur n\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb p\u00ebrqindjen e ul\u00ebt t\u00eb<\/span>
\nvendeve vakante p\u00ebr mjek\u00eb (vet\u00ebm 4%), si dhe numrin e lart\u00eb t\u00eb student\u00ebve q\u00eb studiojn\u00eb n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb<\/span>
\nfush\u00eb t\u00eb sh\u00ebndetit publik, vler\u00ebsoj se bazuar vet\u00ebm n\u00eb k\u00ebto statistika situata aktuale nuk paraqitet<\/span>
\ne till\u00eb, pra q\u00eb t\u00eb ket\u00eb qen\u00eb n\u00eb at\u00eb mas\u00eb emergjente q\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrkthehet n\u00eb nj\u00eb interes publik t\u00eb shtuar<\/span>
\nposa\u00e7\u00ebrisht, gj\u00eb q\u00eb do ta b\u00ebnte t\u00eb nevojshme nj\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrje t\u00eb till\u00eb dhe do t\u00eb justifikonte masa me<\/span>
\nnatyr\u00eb ligjore dhe miratimin e skemave t\u00eb tilla p\u00ebr t\u00eb plot\u00ebsuar nevojat e popullat\u00ebs n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb<\/span>
\nVendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/span>
\nK\u00ebrkues: Nj\u00eb grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit (jo m\u00eb pak se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve) dhe nj\u00eb grup student\u00ebsh t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb<\/span>
\nMjek\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb Tiran\u00eb<\/span>
\nnenit 55 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs. Detyrimi kushtetues q\u00eb i ngarkohet shtetit p\u00ebr t\u00eb garantuar sh\u00ebrbimin e<\/span>
\nsh\u00ebndetit publik t\u00eb shtetasve, t\u00eb cilin ata duhet ta g\u00ebzojn\u00eb n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb barabart\u00eb, mbetet i till\u00eb n\u00eb<\/span>
\n\u00e7do moment, me p\u00ebrjashtim t\u00eb rasteve kur ngrihet n\u00eb nj\u00eb nivel emergjence si\u00e7 ishte situata e<\/span>
\npandemis\u00eb globale COVID 19 apo n\u00eb raste t\u00eb situatave t\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonshme, t\u00eb cilat do t\u00eb<\/span>
\njustifikonin n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb nj\u00eb interesi publik akoma me akut edhe nd\u00ebrhyrjen me masa kufizuese<\/span>
\nt\u00eb k\u00ebsaj natyre.<\/span>
\n14. Po k\u00ebshtu, \u00e7moj se shteti mund t\u00eb merrte masa t\u00eb tjera efektive p\u00ebr t\u00eb siguruar<\/span>
\nsh\u00ebrbimin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor n\u00eb vend dhe p\u00ebr t\u00eb evituar largimin e mjek\u00ebve jasht\u00eb vendit, duke e b\u00ebr\u00eb<\/span>
\nm\u00eb t\u00ebrheq\u00ebse ofert\u00ebn e pun\u00ebs, sipas mund\u00ebsive t\u00eb vet\u00eb ekzekutivit n\u00eb k\u00ebto drejtime pun\u00ebsimi.<\/span>
\nMund\u00ebsia p\u00ebr marrjen e masave t\u00eb tjera efektive \u00ebsht\u00eb pranuar n\u00eb seanc\u00eb plenare publike edhe<\/span>
\nnga p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuesi i K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Ministrave, kur \u00ebsht\u00eb pyetur se si do t\u00eb sigurohej sh\u00ebrbimi<\/span>
\nsh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor n\u00eb vend n\u00ebse t\u00eb gjith\u00eb student\u00ebt e Fakultetit t\u00eb Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb UMT nuk do t\u00eb pranonin<\/span>
\nt\u00eb lidhnin marr\u00ebveshjet, por do t\u00eb pranonin pages\u00ebn e vler\u00ebs s\u00eb plot\u00eb t\u00eb kostos s\u00eb studimeve. Ndaj<\/span>
\nmendoj se n\u00eb nj\u00eb situat\u00eb t\u00eb till\u00eb, ku, referuar asaj q\u00eb u soll n\u00eb v\u00ebmendje t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs nga vet\u00eb ky<\/span>
\nsubjekt i interesuar, gjendemi p\u00ebrpara nj\u00eb p\u00ebrqindjeje t\u00eb ul\u00ebt vakancash n\u00eb sistemin sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsor<\/span>
\np\u00ebrkundrejt nevojave p\u00ebr sh\u00ebrbimin publik, e p\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr nuk jemi p\u00ebrpara situatave<\/span>
\npandemiko-globale ose t\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonshme, t\u00eb cilat do t\u00eb k\u00ebrkonin nd\u00ebrhyrje t\u00eb tilla e t\u00eb<\/span>
\nmenj\u00ebhershme n\u00eb kufizime, vler\u00ebsoj se ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi i kishte t\u00eb gjitha mund\u00ebsit\u00eb t\u00eb analizonte<\/span>
\nnd\u00ebrhyrje alternative me t\u00eb buta n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim.<\/span>
\n15. N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, n\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb analiz\u00ebs s\u00eb m\u00ebsip\u00ebrme, vler\u00ebsoj se n\u00eb situat\u00ebn q\u00eb kriteri i<\/span>
\nparashikuar nga neni 17 i Kushtetut\u00ebs, pra ai i nd\u00ebrhyrjes p\u00ebr interes publik, nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb plot\u00ebsuar<\/span>
\nn\u00eb rastin konkret, k\u00ebrkesa e k\u00ebrkuesve duhej t\u00eb ishte pranuar vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb shkak p\u00ebr sa koh\u00eb q\u00eb<\/span>
\nmungesa e k\u00ebtij kriteri b\u00ebnte t\u00eb panevojshme analiz\u00ebn e kritereve vijuese q\u00eb parashikon kjo<\/span>
\nnorm\u00eb kushtetuese, q\u00eb lidhen me proporcionalitetin e nd\u00ebrhyrjes.<\/span>
\nAn\u00ebtare: Sonila Bejtja<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n

<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

\n","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Gjykata Kushtetuese ka zbuluar dit\u00ebn e sotme arsyetimin lidhur me vendimin p\u00ebr shfuqizimin e pjes\u00ebsh t\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb qeveris\u00eb p\u00ebr pun\u00ebsimin e detyruar t\u00eb mjek\u00ebve t\u00eb rinj t\u00eb dal\u00eb nga Fakulteti i Mjek\u00ebsis\u00eb p\u00ebr nj\u00eb periudh\u00eb disa-vje\u00e7are. Gjykata thekson se: \u201cN\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb testit t\u00eb proporcionalitetit, Gjykata ka konstatuar, gjithashtu, se neni 6 i ligjit […]<\/p>\n","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"author":4,"featured_media":657103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-657101","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-lajme"],"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"link","format":"url"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/657101","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=657101"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/657101\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/657103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=657101"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=657101"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=657101"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}