{"id":553084,"date":"2022-10-04T11:17:20","date_gmt":"2022-10-04T09:17:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/?p=553084"},"modified":"2022-10-04T11:19:46","modified_gmt":"2022-10-04T09:19:46","slug":"gjykata-e-strasburgut-rrezon-shkarkimin-e-besnik-canit-nga-kpa-ja-kerkon-rihapje-te-ceshtjes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/2022\/10\/04\/gjykata-e-strasburgut-rrezon-shkarkimin-e-besnik-canit-nga-kpa-ja-kerkon-rihapje-te-ceshtjes\/","title":{"rendered":"Gjykata e Strasburgut rr\u00ebzon shkarkimin e Besnik Canit nga KPA-ja: Vendim i padrejt\u00eb","gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"text"}]},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/p>\n

Gjykata Evropiane e t\u00eb Drejtave<\/a><\/span> e ka cil\u00ebsuar si t\u00eb padrejt\u00eb shkarkimin nga detyra t\u00eb Besnik Canit nga Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit gjat\u00eb vettingut. <\/span><\/p>\n

N\u00eb vendimin e zbardhur t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs thuhet se n\u00eb shkarkimin e Canit ka pasur shkelje t\u00eb Konvent\u00ebs pasi atij i \u00ebsht\u00eb cenuar e drejta p\u00ebr nj\u00eb proces t\u00eb rregullt ligjor. <\/span><\/p>\n

Cani u shkarkua nga KPK-ja n\u00eb shkurt 2020 por vendimi p\u00ebrfundimtar u mor nga Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit, pjes\u00eb e t\u00eb cilit ishte edhe gjyqtari i shkarkuar m\u00eb pas, Luan Daci. <\/span><\/p>\n

Sipas Gjykat\u00ebs Evropian\u00eb t\u00eb t\u00eb Drejtave, Daci ka qen\u00eb i zgjedhur padrejt\u00ebsisht n\u00eb KPA asokohe e p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye \u00e7\u00ebshtj\u00eb duhet t\u00eb kthehet p\u00ebr rigjykim.<\/span><\/p>\n

Daci u shkarkua nga detyra dhe u d\u00ebnua me 6 muaj burg t\u00eb shnd\u00ebrruara n\u00eb sh\u00ebrbim prove pasi kishte falsifikuar dokumentet p\u00ebr t\u2019u zgjedhur an\u00ebtar i KPA-s\u00eb.<\/span><\/p>\n

Konkluzioni i gjykat\u00ebs<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201c115. Gjykata ka v\u00ebrtetuar se kishte nj\u00eb pretendim t\u00eb argumentuesh\u00ebm p\u00ebr nj\u00eb shkelje t\u00eb dukshme t\u00eb nj\u00eb rregulli themelor t\u00eb ligjit t\u00eb brendsh\u00ebm q\u00eb kishte ndikuar negativisht n\u00eb em\u00ebrimin e L.D. si gjyqtar i KPA.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. N\u00eb drit\u00ebn e sa m\u00eb sip\u00ebr, dhe duke pasur parasysh n\u00eb ve\u00e7anti d\u00ebshtimin e gjykatave komb\u00ebtare p\u00ebr t\u00eb shqyrtuar si\u00e7 duhet \u00e7\u00ebshtjet p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse t\u00eb Konvent\u00ebs t\u00eb ngritura nga ankuesi, Gjykata arrin n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se ka pasur shkelje t\u00eb nenit 6 \u00a7 1 t\u00eb Konvent\u00ebs p\u00ebr faktin se L.D. u ul n\u00eb bank\u00ebn e KPA q\u00eb shqyrtoi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen e aplikantit.<\/em><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    (b) P\u00ebr sa i p\u00ebrket d\u00ebshtimit t\u00eb pretenduar t\u00eb L.D. p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbushur kriteret e tjera ligjore t\u00eb p\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebris\u00eb.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Duke pasur parasysh natyr\u00ebn dhe shtrirjen e shkeljes s\u00eb gjetur sipas nenit 6 \u00a7 1 t\u00eb Konvent\u00ebs n\u00eb lidhje me t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e k\u00ebrkuesit p\u00ebr nj\u00eb gjykat\u00eb t\u00eb krijuar me ligj (shih paragrafin 116 m\u00eb lart), Gjykata vendos t\u00eb heq\u00eb dor\u00eb nga shqyrtimi i pranueshm\u00ebris\u00eb dhe bazueshm\u00ebris\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj pjese t\u00eb ankes\u00ebs (shih paragrafin 77 m\u00eb lart).<\/em><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      PRETENDIM SHKELJE T\u00cb NENIT 13 T\u00cb KONVENT\u00cbS<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Ankuesi parashtroi se ai nuk kishte pasur asnj\u00eb mjet juridik efektiv p\u00ebrpara nj\u00eb autoriteti komb\u00ebtar p\u00ebrpara t\u00eb cilit t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtonte shkarkimin e tij t\u00eb supozuar t\u00eb paligjsh\u00ebm nga KPA. Sipas tij, rrjedhimisht, kishte pasur shkelje t\u00eb nenit 13 t\u00eb Konvent\u00ebs.<\/em><\/span><\/li>\n
      2. Qeveria iu referua Xhoxhajt (cituar m\u00eb sip\u00ebr, \u00a7 416) dhe parashtroi se KPA kishte ushtruar juridiksionin e saj t\u00eb plot\u00eb n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e t\u00eb gjitha argumenteve faktike dhe ligjore t\u00eb paraqitura nga ankuesi. Ata argumentuan m\u00eb tej se shtimi i nj\u00eb niveli t\u00eb tret\u00eb juridiksioni n\u00eb procedurat e vettingut do ta kishte nd\u00ebrlikuar dhe zgjatur procesin.<\/em><\/span><\/li>\n
      3. Gjykata v\u00ebren se ankesa e ankuesit nuk drejtohet kund\u00ebr d\u00ebshtimit t\u00eb autoriteteve p\u00ebr t’u marr\u00eb me thelbin e ankes\u00ebs s\u00eb tij sipas nenit 6 \u00a7 1 n\u00eb lidhje me aspektin e “tribunalit t\u00eb krijuar me ligj”, por m\u00eb tep\u00ebr drejt munges\u00ebs s\u00eb p\u00ebrgjithshme t\u00eb mund\u00ebsis\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb ankim kund\u00ebr vendimit t\u00eb KPA-s\u00eb. Rrjedhimisht, ankesa duhet t\u00eb konsiderohet n\u00eb lidhje me ankes\u00ebn sipas nenit 8 t\u00eb Konvent\u00ebs se shkarkimi i k\u00ebrkuesit ishte n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e tij p\u00ebr jet\u00ebn private (shih paragrafin 127 m\u00eb posht\u00eb).<\/em><\/span><\/li>\n
      4. N\u00eb lidhje me k\u00ebt\u00eb, Gjykata rithekson se kur nj\u00eb shkelje e Konvent\u00ebs pretendohet se \u00ebsht\u00eb kryer nga gjykata ose autoriteti m\u00eb i lart\u00eb, zbatimi i nenit 13 i n\u00ebnshtrohet nj\u00eb kufizimi t\u00eb n\u00ebnkuptuar pasi nuk mund t\u00eb interpretohet pasi k\u00ebrkon q\u00eb organet speciale t\u00eb ngrihen me q\u00ebllim t\u00eb shqyrtimit t\u00eb ankesave kund\u00ebr vendimeve t\u00eb gjykatave m\u00eb t\u00eb larta (shih Stoyanova-Tsakova kund\u00ebr Bullgaris\u00eb, nr. 17967\/03, \u00a7 32, 25 qershor 2009).<\/em><\/span><\/li>\n
      5. Duke iu kthyer \u00e7\u00ebshtjes n\u00eb fjal\u00eb, Gjykata v\u00ebren se KPA \u00ebsht\u00eb gjykata e zgjidhjes s\u00eb fundit n\u00eb lidhje me procedurat e verifikimit. Nga kjo rrjedh se kjo ankes\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb haptazi e pabazuar dhe duhet t\u00eb refuzohet, n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me nenin 35 \u00a7\u00a7 3 (a) dhe 4 t\u00eb Konvent\u00ebs.<\/em><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Rrjedhimisht, duke pasur parasysh rrethanat e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes n\u00eb fjal\u00eb dhe n\u00eb mas\u00ebn q\u00eb mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb e mundur sipas ligjit t\u00eb brendsh\u00ebm, forma m\u00eb e p\u00ebrshtatshme e d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimit p\u00ebr shkeljen e s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb ankuesit p\u00ebr nj\u00eb \u201cgjykat\u00eb\u00a0 t\u00eb krijuar me ligj\u201d sipas nenit 6, 1 t\u00eb Konvent\u00ebs do t\u00eb ishte rihapja e procedurave, n\u00ebse aplikanti k\u00ebrkon nj\u00eb rihapje t\u00eb till\u00eb, dhe rishqyrtimi i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me t\u00eb gjitha k\u00ebrkesat e nenit 6, 1 t\u00eb Konvent\u00ebs. S\u00eb fundi, k\u00ebrkuesi k\u00ebrkoi q\u00eb Gjykata t\u00eb anulonte vendimin e KPA -s\u00eb t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 27 shkurt 2020 dhe t\u00eb urdh\u00ebronte Qeverin\u00eb ta rivendoste at\u00eb menj\u00ebher\u00eb n\u00eb zyr\u00ebn e tij t\u00eb m\u00ebparshme. N\u00eb funksion t\u00eb juridiksionit t\u00eb saj\u00a0 dhe natyr\u00ebs s\u00eb shkeljes q\u00eb u konstatua n\u00eb lidhje me procedurat e verifikimit t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuesit, Gjykata e refuzon k\u00ebt\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb.\u201d<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

        Gjykata Evropiane e t\u00eb Drejtave e ka cil\u00ebsuar si t\u00eb padrejt\u00eb shkarkimin nga detyra t\u00eb Besnik Canit nga Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit gjat\u00eb vettingut. N\u00eb vendimin e zbardhur t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs thuhet se n\u00eb shkarkimin e Canit ka pasur shkelje t\u00eb Konvent\u00ebs pasi atij i \u00ebsht\u00eb cenuar e drejta p\u00ebr nj\u00eb proces t\u00eb rregullt ligjor. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"author":51,"featured_media":553085,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22,65,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-553084","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ballina","category-lajme","category-te-fundit"],"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"link","format":"url"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/553084","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/51"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=553084"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/553084\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/553085"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=553084"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=553084"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=553084"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}