{"id":368625,"date":"2020-04-20T18:59:13","date_gmt":"2020-04-20T16:59:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hashtag.al\/?p=368625"},"modified":"2020-04-20T18:59:13","modified_gmt":"2020-04-20T16:59:13","slug":"kritikat-mbi-bllokimin-e-disa-faqeve-ne-internet-akep-sqaron-pse-jane-marre-keto-vendime","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/2020\/04\/20\/kritikat-mbi-bllokimin-e-disa-faqeve-ne-internet-akep-sqaron-pse-jane-marre-keto-vendime\/","title":{"rendered":"Kritikat mbi bllokimin e disa faqeve n\u00eb internet, AKEP sqaron pse jan\u00eb marr\u00eb k\u00ebto vendime","gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"text"}]},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/p>\n

Autoriteti i Komunikimeve Elektronike dhe Postare (AKEP) ka dal\u00eb me nj\u00eb sqarim publik<\/a> lidhur me akuzat q\u00eb jan\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb ndaj k\u00ebtij institucioni dit\u00ebt e fundit p\u00ebr bllokimin apo kufizimin e aksesit n\u00eb disa faqe interneti.<\/span><\/p>\n

N\u00eb sqarimin e AKEP thuhet se asnj\u00eb vendim p\u00ebr kufizimin apo bllokimin e aksesit n\u00eb disa faqe interneti nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb marr\u00eb pa vendimin e shqyrtuar nga organet kompetente t\u00eb cilat kan\u00eb d\u00ebrguar k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn n\u00eb institucionin e komunikimeve elektronike dhe postare.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cUdh\u00ebzimet p\u00ebr bllokimin e aksesit n\u00eb rrjete t\u00eb domain apo faqeve t\u00eb caktuara n\u00eb internet, si dhe p\u00ebrcaktimi, apo listimi i tyre, nuk jan\u00eb as nis\u00ebm dhe as veprimtari mbikqyr\u00ebse e AKEP, por vendime t\u00eb organeve t\u00eb sip\u00ebrp\u00ebrmendura. N\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb nenit 2 t\u00eb Ligjit Nr. 9918\/2008 p\u00ebr komunikimet elektronike, AKEP nuk ka tag\u00ebr t\u00eb shqyrtoj\u00eb dhe t\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyj\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrmbajtje t\u00eb k\u00ebtyre faqeve, p\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb as t\u00eb gjykoj\u00eb n\u00ebse u duhet bllokuar apo kufizuar aksesi dhe n\u00eb \u00e7\u2019mas\u00eb duhet t\u00eb ndodh\u00eb kjo. Detyra e AKEP, n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast, \u00ebsht\u00eb vet\u00ebm t\u2019i p\u00ebrcjell\u00eb sip\u00ebrmarr\u00ebsve t\u00eb komunikimeve elektronike (Internet Service Providers), subjekte t\u00eb ligjit p\u00ebr komunikimet elektronike dhe kuadrit rregullator t\u00eb tij, udh\u00ebzimet p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse nga organet vendimmarr\u00ebse, pa rishikim, modifikim, apo nd\u00ebrhyrje t\u00eb nj\u00ebanshme<\/em>\u201d-thuhet nd\u00ebr t\u00eb tjera n\u00eb sqarimin e AKEP.<\/span><\/p>\n

Njoftimi i AKEP:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Autoriteti i Komunikimeve Elektronike dhe Postare (AKEP) konstaton me shqet\u00ebsim qarkullimin, ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht n\u00eb rrjete sociale, t\u00eb informacioneve t\u00eb shtremb\u00ebruara dhe t\u00eb pabaza lidhur me kufizimin e aksesit n\u00eb rrjet t\u00eb disa domain dhe faqe interneti nga sip\u00ebrmarr\u00ebsit e rrjeteve dhe sh\u00ebrbimeve elektronike.<\/span><\/p>\n

Nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb praktik\u00eb e AKEP t\u00eb shqyrtoj\u00eb apo t\u00eb komentoj\u00eb nd\u00ebrveprimet e shoq\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb informacionit dhe aq m\u00eb pak udh\u00ebzimet q\u00eb i p\u00ebrcillen nga institucionet ligjzbatuese dhe vendimmarr\u00ebse t\u00eb kufizimeve n\u00eb lidhje me p\u00ebrmbajtjet e paligjshme ose t\u00eb d\u00ebmshme, sipas rregullimeve p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse ligjore n\u00eb fuqi, si\u00e7 jan\u00eb Autoriteti i Mediave Audiovizuale (AMA), organet e gjyq\u00ebsorit dhe t\u00eb ndjekjes penale, Policia e Shtetit apo Autoriteti i Mbikqyrjes s\u00eb Lojrave t\u00eb Fatit (AMLF).<\/span><\/p>\n

Udh\u00ebzimet p\u00ebr bllokimin e aksesit n\u00eb rrjete t\u00eb domain apo faqeve t\u00eb caktuara n\u00eb internet, si dhe p\u00ebrcaktimi, apo listimi i tyre, nuk jan\u00eb as nis\u00ebm dhe as veprimtari mbikqyr\u00ebse e AKEP, por vendime t\u00eb organeve t\u00eb sip\u00ebrp\u00ebrmendura. N\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb nenit 2 t\u00eb Ligjit Nr. 9918\/2008 p\u00ebr komunikimet elektronike, AKEP nuk ka tag\u00ebr t\u00eb shqyrtoj\u00eb dhe t\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyj\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrmbajtje t\u00eb k\u00ebtyre faqeve, p\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb as t\u00eb gjykoj\u00eb n\u00ebse u duhet bllokuar apo kufizuar aksesi dhe n\u00eb \u00e7\u2019mas\u00eb duhet t\u00eb ndodh\u00eb kjo. Detyra e AKEP, n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast, \u00ebsht\u00eb vet\u00ebm t\u2019i p\u00ebrcjell\u00eb sip\u00ebrmarr\u00ebsve t\u00eb komunikimeve elektronike (Internet Service Providers), subjekte t\u00eb ligjit p\u00ebr komunikimet elektronike dhe kuadrit rregullator t\u00eb tij, udh\u00ebzimet p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse nga organet vendimmarr\u00ebse, pa rishikim, modifikim, apo nd\u00ebrhyrje t\u00eb nj\u00ebanshme.<\/span><\/p>\n

Nd\u00ebrfaqen komunikative midis k\u00ebtyre organeve dhe sip\u00ebrmarr\u00ebsve t\u00eb rrjeteve dhe sh\u00ebrbimeve elektronike, AKEP e kryen prej hyrjes n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb Rregullores Nr. 47, dat\u00eb 26 tetor 2017, \u201cP\u00ebr zbatimin e autorizimit t\u00eb p\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm\u201d, n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me nenin 15 t\u00eb ligjit p\u00ebr komunikimet elektronike:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cP\u00ebr transmetimet e p\u00ebrcaktuara me p\u00ebrmbajtje t\u00eb paligjshme ose t\u00eb d\u00ebmshme\u00a0mbi baz\u00ebn e nj\u00eb vendimi t\u00eb marr\u00eb nga organet kompetente t\u00eb parashikuara n\u00eb legjislacionin respektiv, zbatohen kufizime. Sip\u00ebrmarr\u00ebsi\/subjekti q\u00eb ofron rrjetin dhe ose sh\u00ebrbimin\/et e komunikimeve elektronike, ka detyrimin ligjor q\u00eb t\u00eb marr\u00eb masat e duhura juridike dhe teknike p\u00ebr zbatimin e kufizimit t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar.\u00a0AKEP, me disponimin e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs s\u00eb organit kompetent t\u00eb fush\u00ebs p\u00ebr kufizimin e transmetimit me p\u00ebrmbajtje t\u00eb paligjshme ose t\u00eb d\u00ebmshme, i drejtohet sip\u00ebrmarr\u00ebsit, subjektit q\u00eb ofron rrjetin dhe\/ose sh\u00ebrbimet e komunikimit elektronik publik, p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrprerjen dhe bllokimin e transmetimit t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj p\u00ebrmbajtje\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n

AKEP, p\u00ebr sa parashikohet m\u00eb sip\u00ebr, vepron n\u00eb mb\u00ebshtetje dhe p\u00ebr t\u00eb leht\u00ebsuar komunikimin mes organeve vendimmarr\u00ebse t\u00eb k\u00ebtyre kufizimeve dhe sip\u00ebrmarr\u00ebsve subjekt t\u00eb k\u00ebtij ligji. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, dhe n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb transparenc\u00ebs institucionale, \u00e7do shkrese p\u00ebrcjell\u00ebse t\u00eb AKEP n\u00eb adres\u00eb t\u00eb sip\u00ebrmarr\u00ebsve t\u00eb rrjeteve dhe sh\u00ebrbimeve elektronike, i bashk\u00eblidhet vendimi i organit p\u00ebrkat\u00ebs. B\u00ebjn\u00eb p\u00ebrjashtim, rast pas rasti, udh\u00ebzimet e organeve gjyq\u00ebsore apo t\u00eb ndjekjes penale, p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb ruajtjes s\u00eb diskrecionit hetimor.<\/span><\/p>\n

N\u00eb kushtet kur prej vitesh nj\u00eb procedur\u00eb e till\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb zbatim dhe nuk ka ngjallur shqet\u00ebsime t\u00eb qen\u00ebsishme, pasi konform legjislacionit n\u00eb fuqi \u2013\u00a0vet\u00ebm n\u00eb 2019, AKEP i jan\u00eb d\u00ebrguar p\u00ebr zbatim k\u00ebrkesa nga AMLF p\u00ebr kufizime n\u00eb 8000 domain\/faqe t\u00eb lojrave t\u00eb fatit dhe n\u00eb rreth 86 domain\/faqe me p\u00ebrmbajtje t\u00eb cil\u00ebsuara t\u00eb jasht\u00ebligjshme nga AMA\u00a0\u2013 AKEP do t\u00eb vijoj\u00eb me profesionaliz\u00ebm dhe transparenc\u00eb detyrat e tij ligjore, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb k\u00ebtu edhe p\u00ebrdit\u00ebsimin e dokumentave rregullator\u00eb q\u00eb koordinojn\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebniet e tij institucionale me autoritetet vendimmarr\u00ebse n\u00eb fush\u00ebn e shoq\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb informacionit dhe m\u00eb gjer\u00eb.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Autoriteti i Komunikimeve Elektronike dhe Postare (AKEP) ka dal\u00eb me nj\u00eb sqarim publik lidhur me akuzat q\u00eb jan\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb ndaj k\u00ebtij institucioni dit\u00ebt e fundit p\u00ebr bllokimin apo kufizimin e aksesit n\u00eb disa faqe interneti. N\u00eb sqarimin e AKEP thuhet se asnj\u00eb vendim p\u00ebr kufizimin apo bllokimin e aksesit n\u00eb disa faqe interneti nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb […]<\/p>\n","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"author":32,"featured_media":368626,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-368625","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-lajme","category-te-fundit"],"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"link","format":"url"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368625","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=368625"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368625\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/368626"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=368625"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=368625"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hashtag.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=368625"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}